Now a more serious thread on the new "Novichok sanctions". First, I disagree with many of the comments that "sanctions against low-level staff are useless". On the contrary, I think individual name-and-shame sanctions are important to deter future recruiting efforts by FSB/GRU.
It's one thing when media publish names & photos of suspected poisoners; a new level of stigma when governments sanction them (and validate media's findings). These guys were promised protection, cover and anonymity by their employers. Now they're on public blacklists forever.
...the next job interviews for GRU and FSB's poison departments won't go smooth... thus much fewer Kudryavtsevs, Osipovs, and Alexandrovs to pick from...and those who apply will be the dumbest ones anyway.
Second, an very important: disappointing that neither US nor UK sanctioned the Signal institute as an entity. (US sanctioned its CEO Zhirov only). As we showed in our investigation, Signal is the hotbed of covert, boutique CW development.
Without Signal being sanctioned, it will continue to have access to purchasing sophisticated Western technology, including chromatography/spectrometry equipment that they can't buy locally. US/UK left a fox in the chicken cage.
And last but not least, where's the EU??
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Can't wait for @Apple and @Google's reactions when the Kremlin bans *them* in Russia (because that's coming).
An example of globalization playing in the hands of authoritarianism. The Netflixes and Apples and Amazons become hostages to revenue streams from non-free markets and then the broken concept of "legal sovereignty" closes the circuit.
Ukrainian president's party MP says tomorrow there will be a closed parliamentary session on "the Wagner topic" followed by a press conference at 15:30 local time where "everything that can be legally said about the Wagnerites will be disclosed". m.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10…
Well it is kind of a historic day in Ukraine. The ruling party finally admitted there was a Ukrainian intel sting operation aimed at capturing Russian mercenaries outside RU territory. However, they say, the plans did not include landing a plane in Kyiv but arrests in Turkey.
Plus, they say, there was information that Russian security services were aware of the sting operation.
Well, this is a start. Leaves lots of unanswered questions, but it's a start. google.com/amp/s/nv.ua/am…
In an exclusive interview, the brother-in-law of Vadim Krasikov (the person accused of the murder of Zelimkhan Khangoshvili in Berlin's Kleiner Tiergarten two years ago), tells us he positively recognized the person held in Berlin as his in-law.
Alexander V. from Kharkiv already testified in Berlin's court last month. However, there he stopped short of identifying conclusively the detained assassin as his in-law, Vadim Krasikov. Shortly after his court appearance, he contacted us to explain he didn't speak the full truth
Sadly, his email had gone into the proverbial spam folder, until we discovered it just days ago. We rushed to interview him in Kyiv: with journalists from @bellingcat, @derspiegel and @the_ins_ru questioning Alexander for hours.
By popular demand, as many of you asked "But what about [talkative overqualified laundry man Kudryavtsev??".. Here he is, in today's sanctions by the US Treasury.
"Spanish shame" is the first thing that comes to mind while watching the chief of SVR's 80-minute interview with Kremlin's wannabe Rush Limbaugh. For starters, intelligence chiefs *don't* do 80-minute interviews, period.
There's literally nothing that an intelligence chief knows that s/he can say publicly. That's why they never do it. That means literally everything that Naryshkin rambled on was pure propaganda, with zero truth or news value.
I take that back - there is news value in his appearance. That the Kremlin patient would ask his intel chief to make a fool of himself says a lot about his degree of insecurity before next month's elections.
Interesting detail from an interview with @MaxvanderWerff:
Q: "But why would @bellingcat & @the_ins_ru accuse you of cooperating with GRU? Maybe you had some contacts with them?
A: "I don't disclose my sources and contacts..."
And It would have been so easy to say "no".