so many of you have heard me go on and on about the Lunar far side, and preserving this as a site of importance heritage for a number of reasons, but in particular for the purpose of #RadioAstronomy ...
If not, here's a couple of quick tweets as a recap ...
Due to the axial rotation and orbit of the Moon, the same side normally faces the Earth. This is called the near side. Which means there is a far side as well, the face that we don't see because it always faces away from the Earth.
So, because of this, opportunity arises!
On Earth, we produce Radio Frequency transmissions for everything - our phones, TV, car radios, submarines, satellite communications, navigation, radar, observations, etc.
Earth leaks ALL of these transmissions into space and across the Solar System ...
Bu the Lunar far side, always facing away from Earth, lives in a sort of Radio Frequency (RF) shadow from Earth's transmissions ...
The RF spectrum is shared by so many users and services. Here's what the Australian allocation looks like!
📸 Wireless Institute of Aus.
There's lots of things, jammed into a limited number of bands available. A lot of these things make life more efficient/easier for many humans on Earth (e.g. Wi-Fi).
The bright yellow boxes are radio astronomy allocations - rather small!
These bands are coordinate and managed by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), which is a special agency of the United Nations.
This ensures certain bands apply to certain things and there isn't any interference, cross-over or battles for these bands.
Since all those bands are occupied for human activities on Earth, they all can't be used for the purpose of science, and in particular radio astronomy (because they are occupied with lots of existing transmissions).
If only there was a place free of Earth's RF transmissions...
Enter stage right, the Lunar far side (AKA the 'Shielded Zone of the Moon' - SZM).
Here's a place where radio telescopes could scan all these wide-ranging frequencies for scientific purposes and not have to worry about Earth's transmissions ...
Why is this important? Well, it could be the great unknown that holds an answer to one of our scientific questions.
Maybe there is some random type of object that emits ONLY in the same band as your fav local radio station - and its hidden from our view because our transmissions
That's obviously a very^2 hypothetical example and there are a number of factors that I have not mentioned, but I was just trying to provide a quick analogy of the potential ...
Now of course to do this kinda research you would need to build radio telescopes on the lunar far side, which comes with its own set of HUGE challenges (funding, maintenance, delivery, data processing/transmission, etc.) ...
But the idea is starting to gain a little ground...
For example, NASA has started to consider the proposal. Again, these are very EARLY stage ideas and require LOTS more thinking, planning and consideration ...
So I guess if we ever wanted to do this science on the far side of the Moon, we would need to start considering the preservation of the Shielded Zone of the Moon - in particular from the oncoming/growing commercialisation of space and access to the Moon by LOTS of parties.
And sure, it might seem like early days to be thinking about this stuff, but there are already things happening on the lunar far side - e.g. China's relay Queqiao satellites!
So I was doing some digging and reading about any protections that the Shielded Zone of the Moon has and happened to come across the International Telecommunication Union Recommendation RA.479-5 (current, and in force, since approved in May 2003)
And I was pleased to note that the ITU recommends that as a first recommendation:
"all frequencies below 2 GHz in the SZM should be accessible to radio astronomy"
and additionally spectral lines that cannot be observed from Earth's atmosphere should also be retained ...
There is also a recommendation for communications on the Lunar far side from this document is to be between the 2 - 3 GHz band.
Though, tbh - I don't know how accepted/practiced this is/will be ...
Looks like there was a resolution passed at the 22nd IAU general assembly too.
Anyhoo, I'm kinda just scratching the surface here - and loving it! But am doing some documenting as well ... so if anyone out there in Twitter land knows someone who might know someone, I'd love to chat more with them - both on the science side AND legal framework.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was speaking to my mum today, she is getting ready for 2nd jab next week. They're all in Fairfield.
I asked her how the mood was out there ... and encouragingly she said that it's done a 180-flip ... people are wanting/rushing to book themselves in for the vaccine ASAP.
1/n
I asked her why, what changed?
She said the biggest motivator for the people she was speaking to was the notion that the double-vaxxed would be able to go to do things, go to shops, etc. over those who were not vaxxed.
It's a HUGE motivator out there IMO.
2/n
I know there are complexities with this strategy (e.g., privilege access to health, location, vaccine availability, etc.) but mum reckons, well at least for Fairfield and at least amongst her large community network - that this changed people's minds quicksmart.
3/n
And while we're on the topic of #Pulsars, an exciting thing happened in the last few days ... the relatively nearby #VelaPulsar happened to glitch again!
Vela is known to glitch every 2.5-3 years, so let's dig in with a short thread on why this is exciting.
Steve runs the Hawkesbury Radio Observatory just near Sydney.
Steve (@Hawk_RAO) is no stranger to using his home radio observatory set up of Yagis to detect pulsars and has previously detected a Vela pulsar glitch in the past!
It truly is amazing that in a world awash with data of oceans warming, reefs bleaching and climate change amplifying - that the Environment Minister (and Govt.) would lobby (and obtain) support from 44 other countries to deny risk categorizing of one of our most precious assets.
It’s bad enough when leaders sit on their hands and do nothing about climate change.
But when they actively go out of their way to ensure that the risks are not addressed appropriately for their own sinister (and greed-driven) purposes …. We’ll, that’s criminal.
They’ll play some weird “China is trying to get back at us” card (or some other political angle) instead of just looking at the facts that seem to be abundant and available for all to access:
Researching about Karl Rümker (1788-1862) who got into a fight with Thomas Brisbane over 4 km^2 on the west side of the Nepean river in 1823.
Henry Bathurst had to get involved to resolve the beef between them.
📸 MAAS
Rümker eventually held the title of the Government's Astronomer here in NSW, observing lots of objects from the Parramatta observatory, incl. the rediscovery of Comet Encke in 1822.
He went back to EU and published a 12,000-star catalogue of southern skies in 1832.
Sounds like Rümker was into a bit of fisty cuffs given he got into yet another fight in England with President of the Royal Astronomical Society, James South, who banned him from working n British Govt. thereafter.
Mons Rümker, the lunar massif with 22 domes named after him.
Ohhhh, using seismic data (Marsquakes FTW!) observed by @NASAInSight - scientists have now measured the Martian core to be 1830 km with an error bar of ± 40km!
Unexpected rabbit hole of the Mars liquid core paper from this morning ... chasing down historical papers values of the mean core density (compared with the 5.7 to 6.3 g/cc reported) in reflection of JPLs ephemeris data (which also use Mars mass to establish Asteroid belt mass)
I mean, this might get loads of people talking about WASP-127b at least …
The planet has a radius bigger than Jupiter (though, much less dense), was discovered in 2016 via transit method and orbits very close to its host star every four days.