#PFIZERLEAK - THE ISRAELI CONNECTION
(thread)
Was Dr. Robert Malone wrong about his claims about the contract between Israel and Pfizer? Does the Israeli government has an agreement not to disclose adverse events for a minimum of 10 years?

Time to set the records straight.
I don't like bullies. It is one thing for someone gets upset and call you an idiot. It is completely different when a whole smear campaign is being conducted against an individual because of their believes, which is what @TheAtlantic did to @RWMaloneMD
Since I was the person who was interviewed by The American Frontline Doctors which is the tweet he quoted, I thought it is time to address this disgrace of an "article". This is the hit piece of that appeared in The Atlantic, written by Tom Bartlett.
theatlantic.com/science/archiv…
1) does @TheAtlantic claims @RWMaloneMD claims about Israel are misleading speculation or plainly false? Please be clear.
2) "hard to believe" is not investigative journalism, it's an opinion. Did Tom look at the facts and see what exactly is going on between Israel and Pfizer?
First, let us look at the specific case mentioned by The Atlantic.
Tom claimed that "the country’s health ministry has already warned of a link between the Pfizer shot
and rare cases of myocarditis."

What really happened? Here's the Israeli press release:
gov.il/en/Departments…
Let us first look at the press release:
1) Even though myocarditis usually appears among younger men, aged 16 to 30, the report admits it started to appear among the younger age group, 16 to 19.

2) 275 cases were mentioned, 148 around the shot.
3) The PR mentioning the total # of individuals who got the shot is statistical fallacy. Since the majority of those who got myocarditis were from the age group of 16 to 19, there should have been focus on the # of vaccinated among that group as it is the major risk group.
4) 95% were considered to be mild cases - is it for the whole 275 cases mentioned, or for the 148?

5) Does the press release means 7 young people at the age of 16 to 19 got severe myocarditis (95% of 148) or 14 out of the total population, and if so what age where they?
Let's dig deeper.

Here is the link to the epidemiological team, who published "Short Communication" called "Myocarditis following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination"

hy.health.gov.il/_Uploads/dbsAt…
First, a reminder to the Ministry of health press release:

"In most cases myocarditis took the form of mild illness that passed within a few days."
And here is the epidemiological team statement:

"myocarditis may have a more severe clinical presentation, may impose limitations on physical activity and may require long-term medical treatment, and follow-up"

Can you spot the difference ?????????
Next, the majority of the cases, as the MoH, were of young people at the age of 16 to 19, yet only two cases out of 6 which were reported about were at that group.

The selection criteria for this research is not in line with the distribution among population.
Next,
The hospital serve 500K, average 1.17 cases per month. 6 patients presented in less than a month.

Israel allowed 16yrs to 18yrs get the shot at the end of January.

1) How many of the 500K got the shot?
2) How many between the age 16 to 18?
3) Are the 6 the only cases?
As you saw, the report of the Ministry of Health, the way it is structured and it's conclusions, alongside the very small selection group and the inability to extract meaningful information from it with regards to the real risk is weird... until you read the Pfizer contract.
The research contract between Pfizer and Israel is called "REAL-WORLD EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE COLLABORATION AGREEMENT" and you can find it here:

israelhayom.co.il/sites/default/…
The "product" are all vaccines (see #PfizerLeak for definition) for the PREVENTION of the human disease COVID-19 OR ANY OTHER DISEASE caused by SARS-CoV-2 strains, mutation, MODIFICATIONS or derivatives.

1) The product does not prevent the disease.
2) What modifications?
Project: epidemiological data analyses, as described
in Section 2 and Exhibit A.

Sec 2: measure and analyze epidemiological data arising from the Product.
Ex. A:
Additional subgroup analyses and vaxines effectiveness analyses, AS AGREED BY THE PARTIES.
As you can see by the agreement above, THE PARTIES must agree to perform a test.

The Israeli MoH cannot decide to do "subgroup analysis" by itself. PFIZER NEED TO AGREE ON IT.
The contract seems to be indefinite, until completion of the Project (IF EVER).
Publications:
"PFIZER and MoH will jointly prepare and publish the Results in submissions) for publication, to peer-reviewed scientific or medical journals."
The Israeli MoH is "allowed" to communicate to the public anything OTHER THAN what they "measure and analyze (in the) epidemiological data arising from the Product rollout"

I guess the Israeli MoH can still publish the weather, right?
If one side want to publish epidemiological data arising from the Product rollout ON THEIR OWN (e.g. MoH), the other side must be given this in advance for it to provide comments.
Confidentiality:
Pfizer has the right to ask for "the deletion of any reference to the other Party’s Confidential Information from the proposed disclosure or publication".
Confidential: Technology, research, Pfizer Data, project data or results unless public health data.
"All disclosures and publications must expressly acknowledge the other Party, unless such Party objects to such acknowledgment"
THERE IS MORE BELOW!!!

Press the "Show replies"
👇👇👇
If Pfizer & MoH does not agree on publication of information, it will need to be agreed between (someone) in Pfizer and Sharon Alroy-Preis, who works for the MoH as Israel's director of public health services.
Sharon Alroy-Preis was a co-author of "Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data"
So Sharon Alroy-Preis, the person who is suppose to negotiate in case Israel wants to publish something has been a co-author of a publication which was using the project data.

Isn't that a conflict of interest?

thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Sharon Alroy-Preis works for the MoH, who signed the manufacturing the supply agreement with Pfizer and agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer...against any and all suits, claims...caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the Vaccine"
#PfizerLeak
So, what did we learned so far?
1) @TheAtlantic "journalist" didn't do any journalism but a hit piece, without looking at the evidence.

2) Isreal's MoH reporting seems to be extremely biased towards downgrading adverse events, trying to bury them.
3) The contract itself has no expiration date, which gives incentives to both parties to make it last as long as possible. For Israel MoH, it means people who work in the project has a job, get published in magazines (e.g. Sharon Alroy-Preis), and have no incentives to stop it.
4) There is no clear definition what is "public health data" in the contract; epidemiological data is considered to be project data, not public health data. Pfizer and MoH need to agree on new epidemiological investigations.
5) There are conflicts of interest both on MoH, who is suppose to protect Pfizer from any legal claims and yet it runs this project, and on a personal level, by assigning an individual who works for the MoH as a mediator, who also is directly involve in the project.
6) I think that what I found is much worse than the claim of the scientist who told @RWMaloneMD that the Israel and Pfizer will not disclose adverse events for a minimum of 10 years. The research contract is heavily redacted & the Manufacturing & supply contract was not exposed.
7) I INVITE YOU TO READ THE EVIDENCE AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF.

Finally, @RWMaloneMD - thank you for your courage for speaking out and withstanding the waves of slur. What an inspiration.

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE.

Ehden Biber,
Also @ T.ME/EH_DEN
As was brought to my attention, this smear job was supported by grants from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and the Robert Johnson Foundation, a member of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

"It's a big club, and you ain't in it!" (George Carlin).

#PFIZERLEAK - THE ISRAELI CONNECTION - APPENDIX A.

BLOG POST ABOUT THE BRAZILIAN CONTRACT:

✓ STEP-BY-STEP VALIDATION OF THE CONTRACT
✓ ANALYSIS OF CONTRACT CLAUSES
✓ STATEMENT BY SENIOR PFIZER EXECUTIVE ALL COUNTRIES SIGNED SUCH CONTRACT
#PfizerLeak
#PFIZERLEAK - THE ISRAELI CONNECTION - APPENDIX B.

PFIZERLEAK REDUX - YOUR DEMOCRACY IS IN DANGER!

THE REAL REASON WHY YOUR GOVERNMENT KEEPS THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY CONTRACTS SECRET FOR 10 YEARS.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ehden @ TELEGRAM CHANNEL: T.ME/EH_DEN

Ehden @ TELEGRAM CHANNEL: T.ME/EH_DEN Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @eh_den

17 Sep
#PFIZERLEAK - CRIMES AGAINST #EU-MANITY - THE PREQUEL EDITION!

WHAT DID THE MEMBER STATES COMMIT TO WHEN THEY DIDN'T OPT-OUT OF THE EC AGREEMENT WITH VACCINE MANUFACTURERS AND WHY?

The prequel to how the #EC tricked member states, MEPs and EU citizens..

#PfizerLeak Image
To understand what member states got dragged into these horrible agreements, let's go back to the agreement between the commission & member states on producing vaccines, annexed to EC decision C(2020) 4192 from the 18th of June 2020.

ec.europa.eu/info/sites/def…

#PfizerLeak Image
In a typical European Commission style, the APAs were "approved for signature on behalf and in the name of the participating Member States by a separate individual Commission decision."

Or in other words - the member states are rubber stamps to the EC decisions.

#PfizerLeak Image
Read 26 tweets
11 Sep
#PFIZERLEAK - ISRAEL: THE STATE OF (MIS)INFORMATION.

(Thread)

THE CONNECTION BETWEEN BILL CLINTON AND THE ISRAELI MINISTRY OF HEALTH.

(remember - always use "show replies" at the end)

#PfizerLeak
On Friday @arad_nir, Israeli journalist, has exposed that according to Philip Dormitzer, Pfizer's Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer (Viral Vaccines), Israel acts as "a sort of a laboratory", and that its MoH is exclusively using the Pfizer product.

#PfizerLeak
@arad_nir pointed out that this was in direct conflict with the statement of Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis (Israel's director of Public Health Services in the MoH) given only 3 weeks ago, when he asked her why does the Israeli citizens are trapped by the Pfizer contract.

#PfizerLeak
Read 25 tweets
5 Sep
#PFIZERLEAK - CRIMES AGAINST #EU-MANITY.

HOW THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DECEIVED EU MEMBER STATES AND EU CITIZENS.

The story behind the biggest European Commission (EC) regulatory scandal of all times.

Welcome to 21st century totalitarianism, EC style.

(thread)

#PfizerLeak
On the 17th of June 2020 the EC declared the "EU Strategy for COVID-19 vaccines".

It was based on two pillars:

1) "Securing sufficient production of vaccines in the EU through Advance Purchase Agreements (APAs)" with manufacturers.

#PfizerLeak
eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/…
2) Adapt the "regulatory framework ...making use of existing regulatory flexibility to accelerate the development, authorisation and availability of vaccines while maintaining the standards for vaccine quality, safety and efficacy."
#PfizerLeak Image
Read 84 tweets
2 Sep
COPTIGATE - THE SUMMARY EDITION!
(thread)

Highlights from my writing on the topic of codon optimization, for those who have never heard about it before (or for those who wish to share it with others).

#COptiGate
Before you bombard experts (e.g. @RWMaloneMD) with endless requests to comment on the validity of what I write, please read this thread, then go to the previous threads (links below), and see the references I use.
There is MUCH MORE INFORMATION in my previous threads!

#COptiGate
1) Inconsequential (“silent”) mutations are known as synonymous mutation.
2) Synonymous mutations contribute to cellular processes which are determining protein structure and function.
3) Synonymous mutations influence protein folding.

#COptiGate
Read 32 tweets
30 Aug
@plecbe @wimremes Hi!
Stats:
Brussels/Belgium, 26/8/2021:
20/57 admissions
25/75 releases
191/602 in hospital
68/182 in ICU
37/98 on ventilator
# beds in Brussels: 7070. St. Jin: 548, ~8%, w/statistically ~3 PATIENTS ON VENT.

NEVER TRUST THE MEDIA!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_h…
datastudio.google.com/embed/u/0/repo…
@plecbe @wimremes More:
According to the article, only 64% of the adult population in Brussels are FULLY vaccinated. Since there is almost same # of vaccinated and non-vaccinated on ventilators in Israel, this statistic just doesn't add up.

+: how many on vent has 1 shot?

gov.il/en/departments…
@plecbe @wimremes UNVACCINATED POPULATIONS

Most people fail to realize that in many times SICK PEOPLE under Immunosuppressive Therapies ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE THE COVID19 VACCINE due to their condition.

Here is BC's Centre for Disease Control document on the topic:

bccdc.ca/resource-galle…
Read 4 tweets
28 Aug
REVERSE ENGINEERING: WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE GENETIC CODE WITHIN THE PFIZER VACCINE?

(thread)
What does the mRNA code in the Pfizer vaccine tell us about the genetic design decisions, its safety, possible impact on our health, and the "quality" of FDA BLA approval?

#COptiGate Image
This is going to be A LONG thread; I will review the code after the introduction. As usual (with my posts), please use the "show replies" option multiple times to unveil the whole thread.

OK, let's start!

#COptiGate
The FDA's approval to Pfizer's Biological License Application (BLA) stated "...our review of information submitted in your BLA application...did not raise concerns or controversial issues that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion."

REALLY ???

#COptiGate ImageImage
Read 60 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(