Daniel Profile picture
21 Aug, 32 tweets, 6 min read
“Alibaba is not the Chinese Amazon!”

$BABA, $TCEHY, $JD, and other big Chinese tech companies lost +20% in the last weeks and months.

Alibaba is currently 92% of my invested capital.

This is my take on Chinese Tech at the moment.👇🏼
I've received many messages in the last weeks asking about my opinion on Chinese tech.

I've mentioned companies like $BABA a couple of times lately.

I did say that I have a big position in Alibaba.
(1/5) Position Size

What does “big position” mean?

As mentioned above, 92% of my invested capital is in $BABA.

BUT, part of the truth is that I took some of the profits I made last year out of my portfolio.
Some of my holdings reached their fair value, and I used the chance to take out money that I currently had a use for.

Rule Number 1: Never invest money that you could need in the future.
Comparing my current $BABA position to the worth of last year's portfolio, the position would be around 50%.

Still pretty significant.

Why do I bet so big on Alibaba?
(2/5) Know what you own!

I opened this thread by saying:

“Alibaba is not the Chinese Amazon!”

I think many investors forget this.

Alibaba can and never will be the next Amazon.
And this is crucial.

China will never treat its companies like the US does.

Every investor in $BABA, $TCHEY, $JD, etc. needs to be aware of that.
I don't act like I knew this wave of regulation, which we discuss later, will come.

But knowing where I invest, I knew the possibility is there.
Valuation work often includes country risk premiums.

They tell you what premium you should apply to a country, considering the risks given.

Different Countries -> Different Risks

Be aware of those risks!
(3/5) Noice

The regulations we've seen this far were not fundamentally damaging for Alibaba.

At the moment, Alibaba is pulled down by the sentiment around China.

This might change. Maybe new regulation will hit $BABA’s fundamentals.
One thing is clear.

Uncertainty up -> Risk up

Alibaba did get riskier in the last months.

But that risk is already priced in the stock.

Alibaba went from $254 to $157 in the last 6 months.
Does that mean Alibaba can't get lower? Absolutely not.

It can go to 0.

Like every other company.

Is it likely to go lower?

In the short term, probably.
Never bet against the trend.
In the long term, I think it won't.

(otherwise, I would be insane, considering my position)

Why do I think Alibaba will go up in the long term?
(4/5) Recency Bias and Incentives

Look at $BABA history, or $AMZN or $AAPL; it doesn't matter.

They all have one thing in common.

They had multiple ‘crashes’ of 20% or more.

Every stock has.
Now, look at the headlines of newspapers and tv shows at that time.

When a stock goes down, the headlines get negative.

That's happening every time.
Over and over again.
That's what is happening to all Chinese companies right now.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying there is no bad news or risk at the moment.

But a good investor has the ability to zoom out.
View every headline separately and check them.

Don't take them as this wave of negativity.

If you do that, the sheer amount of bad headlines will influence your decision making.
Just because something is repeated 100 times doesn't make it true.

I don't neglect the news surrounding Chinese tech.

But I put them into perspective.
And it seems to me that we are down pricing Chinese tech to an unrealistic level.

Right now, the price does not justify the regulation nor the uncertainty we've experienced.

And my guess, emphasizing the word guess, is that future regulation won't either.
Why?

Because I don't see the reason why the Chinese government should destroy their crown jewels.

Keyword: Incentives
The government probably wants more influence on these companies.

But they don't want to break them down.

Alibaba, Tencent, JD, these are the international flagship companies for China.
And China is not in the position to lose them.

Maybe the future will weaken the importance of these companies, but we're talking very long term now.

China is also still dependant on outside capital.
Burning hundreds of billions by restricting foreign investments can not be the goal.

All these things can change in the decades to come, but I don't think we are there yet.

The recent events scare people, and they’re overestimating the probability of these regulations.
(5/5) ‘Redistribution’ of Wealth

One headline was especially threatening.

Tencent announced to give a total of $15 billion away.

A sort of donation to the Chinese people.

This was concerning, not going to lie.
But what does this really mean?

It's not an annual obligation, tax, or anything of that sort.

It's supposedly a one-time thing; we will see if that's the case.

Still, it's not as alarming on the second look if you ask me.

Let's take a look at the cause of this donation.
China's government is determined to lift people out of poverty and thus increase the middle class.

Now, applying our long-term thinking, who benefits most?

In my opinion, especially companies like Alibaba.

They're the number one e-commerce platform in China.
Who benefits more from an increased middle class than the big tech companies?

In China are living almost 1.4 billion people.

That's 1.4 billion possible customers.
Yes, Alibaba, Tencent, and co might have to carry some costs for the project ‘increased middle class’ in the future.

But here we are again.

That was not unpredictable considering the country we invest in.

Know your investments and their risks.
I will end this thread as I started it:

“Alibaba is not the Chinese Amazon!”
Now I wanna hear opinion. Tell me in the comments.

I'm also interested in the opinion of the following people. All of them write about Chinese tech and regulation.

I learned a lot of stuff reading their threads and opinions

@JoshuaTai0427
@BuyandHoldd
@dengusa
@bkaellner
I would appreciate your support by retweeting this thread.

The more people see it, the more opinions we will hear in the comments.

Thanks a lot!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel

Daniel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MnkeDaniel

13 Sep
Social Media has changed how we Invest forever!🧵

Most trends come and go.

Social Media, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, etc.
Did not belong to such trends.

In this thread, I discuss the influence Social Media and Co. have on investors and the finance industry.
(1/5) Accelerated Cycle of Emotions

In 2020, we saw one of the fastest drawdowns in stock market history.

Followed by an unprecedented rally.

The S&P 500 rose 93% from the 20th of March 2020 to today.
There are many reasons for this.

One, was the fast-changing sentiment.
Fear of loss turned into Fear of missing out very quickly.

The rapid fall of the market quickly seemed like an opportunity.

Especially young investors, like myself, made a run at the markets.

On social media, the narrative was bullish.
Read 22 tweets
11 Sep
You probably know Benjamin Graham.

But do you know David L. Dodd?

Without David LeFevre Dodd, the Bible of Value investing would’ve never been written.

Also, we wouldn't know who Warren Buffett is today.

It's time to tell his Story... Image
After leaving High School, David studied economics.

In 1921, he received his Bachelor of Science from the University of Pennsylvania.

One year later, in 1921, he studied at Columbia University.

At the same time, Benjamin Graham started to teach at Columbia.
In his lectures, Graham wanted someone to write transcripts.

David volunteered and from thereon worked with Graham.

These transcripts, later served as the basis for Security Analysis.
Read 14 tweets
31 Aug
All you need to know about Value Investing in one Thread 🧵

If I do my job, you'll know how investing works at the end of this thread.

Let's start!
1. The Assumption

Value investing is based on one assumption.

Markets are Inefficient.

What are inefficient markets, you may ask?
In an inefficient market, asset prices do not accurately reflect their true value.

The market makes mistakes.

Mispricings occur and offer opportunities.

Opportunities to benefit from that mispricing.
Read 25 tweets
30 Aug
Ian Cassel's Tweets are a Gold Mine of Investment Wisdom and Life Lessons.

His Tweets are insightful and sharp.

Here are 10 Investment and Life Lessons by @iancassel 🧵
If you invest for the long term, chances are you choose your investments accordingly.

So if you've made the decision to buy a stock, and the reason that made you buy it is still in place, believe in it.

Don't let anyone scare you out.

To find out if that reason is still in place, you need to do your homework.

Reassess what the company is doing.

Is your thesis still in place?
Is the company doing as you expected?

Read 10 tweets
30 Aug
Chinese Regulation is all over the news recently.

I tried to sum up what happened in the last weeks and assess what has changed.

👇🏼
(1/3) Delistings of Chinese Firms

Let's start with the biggest concern.

The possibility of delistings.

Since the $DIDI situation in July, investors fear the possibility that Chinese stocks will vanish from U.S. markets.
At the end of July, the Chinese government surprised investors by considering a penalty for $DIDI.

Didi seemingly IPOed in the U.S against the recommendation of the Chinese government.
Read 33 tweets
24 Aug
How would you feel losing $76,200,000,000?

(that's billions, just in case you're too shocked to notice😉)

Yeah, me too. At least, when your first thought was: “Terrible!”

Fortunately, I, and I assume you too, don't know that feeling.

There is a man who does.
That man is Bill Miller.

Billionaire, Value Investor, and someone who knows how losing 76 billion dollars feels like.

In 2008, Miller made a huge and leveraged bet on Bear Stearns and other banks.

As we know today, these bets didn't work out.
His 77 billion dollar fund lost over 90% of its money.

Many investors pulled their money out.

Bill Miller was left with $800 million.

Down 76,200,000,000 dollars.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(