As it turns out, many of Hitler's generals not only made it through the Nuremberg trials unscathed, they returned to their positions after the war. As soon as Germany's military was re-authorized by Allied Command in 1955 as the Bundeswehr, these Nazi generals were re-hired.
They simply removed the swastika from the uniforms and went on as before. They didn't even remove the Phoenix, just continuing to pretend it was an eagle.
This was all known and authorized by the US and England, since we continued to run Germany behind the scenes (and still do). Or, the same people that run us also run Germany. The French pretended to object, but of course no one ever listens to the French.
How is any of this rational or believable? How could the Nuremberg judges outlaw the Nazis but then allow Nazi generals and admirals to be rehired just ten years later?
But it is even worse than that, because the top general rehired was Hans Speidel, Rommel's second-in-command. He was 3-star at the end of the war.
To cleanse him and make some of this seem somewhat believable to the credulous, the story was later concocted that he had betrayed Rommel (by accident), then been jailed by the Gestapo for the last seven months of the war.
So we are supposed to believe he was plotting against Hitler, though there was never any such plot. Rommel's death was faked and Speidel was never in jail.
In fact, the Allies didn't free him from jail, the story being he “slipped his captors” just before the Allies arrived. That's convenient.
Anyway, Speidel's parents are not given in the common bios. Another red flag. We have to go to Geni for some information. There we find both his parents were nobles. His father was a von Ofterdingen and his mother a von Klipstein.
He was also a von Alberti, a von Degenfeld, a Hanff, a Gulde (Goold), a Lotheissen, and a Hesse. The Degenfelds are a branch of the Schonburgs. One Degenfeld was the wife of the Elector Palatinate Ludwig, linking us to the Wittelsbachs. Ludwig's cousin was the King of Bohemia.
The Alberti are nobles originally from Florence who later married into the Bourbon family. The Guldes are Jewish goldsmiths. The Klipsteins are also Jews/cryptos, since the name means reused stone, as in stonemason or freemason.
There were three famous Bavarian generals von Speidel, one of whom (Maximilian) just happened to be the head of Hitler's unit in WWI. Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
This Maximilian von Speidel was also a baron and later became War Minister in 1916. His wife's father was the Earl of Arco in the Valley, which means his brother-in-law was the Anton Graf von Arco auf Valley who allegedly murdered Prime Minister Kurt Eisner-another fake of course
Fortunately, Wikipedia admits Anton's mother was Emily von Oppenheim, of the wealthy Jewish bankers. Confirming that all these people are Jewish.
Anton's aunt married John Dalberg-Acton, the 1st Baron Acton and Marquess Groppoli, who continued to pretend to be Catholic while taking Jewish wives.
Lord Acton is the one who said “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. He should know. His mother was the Duchess Dahlberg, grand-niece of the Arch-chancellor of the Holy Roman Empire.
We also have General Albert von Speidel of the same period, and he later became artistic director of the Munich Court theater—which reminds us of the von Hulsen-Haeselers, who were both generals and theater directors.
We never understood the connection until recently, when we realized these wars were massive theater projects. Actually, all of government is.
Also Edmund Freiherr von Speidel, general of the previous generation.
Also WWII Luftwaffe General Hans-Georg von Seidel, whom Wikipedia mysteriously lists on the Speidel page. He is given no parents, but his birth and death dates are the spooky 11/11/1894 and 11/10/1955, telling us we are on the right track.
Is it possible the von Seidels and von Speidels are the same family? At any rate, the von Seidels of Berlin were related to the Prussian King, since Martha Seidel married Erich Albrecht von Preussen, son of Prince Joachim, in about 1925.
So, as you see, it is the same people before and after every revolution, before and after every war.
Hans Speidel was promoted to 4-star general in 1955 and became head of the German army. Just two years later he was promoted to Supreme Commander of NATO, which makes even less sense. A Nazi commander of NATO in 1957? Really?
He held that command until 1963, and the French are going to love this: do you know where his residence was as NATO commander? The Palace of Fontainebleu in Paris. So Paris was occupied by the Nazis from 1940 to 1944, and then NATO allowed them to reoccupy it in 1957.
Even Der Spiegel started to question some of this recently. In 2014 they noted that documents had surfaced confirming Speidel and these other Nazi generals were not innocent or turned after the war.
According to official documents, they established the Schneez-Truppe, an illegal covert paramilitary organization of former Waffen-SS and Wehrmacht officers. They allegedly formed to fight off the Soviet Union, but that story doesn't scan.
As is admitted, the organization spied on left-leaning politicians in Germany, just as you would expect of a bunch of cloaked nobles. They were not only known to German Intelligence, but worked with them.
Of course the Der Spiegel reportage is more misdirection, but it is useful to us nonetheless. All we have to do is despin it.
For more comedy, we find Speidel later undermined his own mainstream story. Remember, we are supposed to think he wasn't a bad Nazi because he turned on Rommel or something. So he was clean in some way they never bother to clarify.
But in 1960 Speidel won a libel case against an East German film studio that simply reported the mainstream story. To win that case, it had to be found it was false, which means Speidel didn't turn on Rommel. He wasn't a narc. But if he wasn't a narc, what was he?
He was a loyal Nazi, which means his post-1955 story falls apart. He can't have it both ways.
Another Nazi general rehired after the war was Adolf Heusinger, whose names already looks Jewish.
We have seen some anons at Stormfront arguing that people named Adolf can't be Jewish, but we have found the opposite: all famous people named Adolf are Jewish.
His parents are scrubbed at Wikipedia, giving us early confirmation of that. Ancestry com also confirms it, since the Heusingers changed the spelling to Heisinger after the war. That is a variant of Eisinger, and is Jewish.
Heusinger was briefly brevet 4-star in 1944, when he replaced Zeitzler in June. He was allegedly standing next to Hitler when the July 20 bomb went off and was allegedly wounded, though we see no signs of it in later life.
He was not inconvenienced by the Nuremberg trials, which is curious. He was Adenauer's military advisor by 1950 and was recommissioned as a Lt. General in 1955. He was 4-star by 1957 and became Chairman of the NATO military committee in 1961, stationed in DC.
Now we find that all this time he was wanted for war crimes by the Soviets, but they couldn't capture him. Strange that NATO didn't care about Heusinger's Nazi war crimes, right? And Nuremberg didn't either.
Remember, the Russians had two judges sitting at Nuremberg, and Heusinger testified there, but I guess Volchkov and Nikitchenko didn't realize this Heusinger was the Heusinger they were after.
Another Nazi general was Josias Prince of Waldeck and Pyrmont. He was the nephew of two current kings, the King of Wurttemberg and King William III of the Netherlands.
Josias allegedly joined the Nazi party in 1929, at age 33, which is curious in that the Nazi party at that time was supposed to be a workers party. Why was this prince joining it? Was he a worker? Was he worried about Polish workers coming in from the east and taking his job?
We never get answers to questions like that. Also not believable is that he was a Lt. General just three years later, at age 36. In 1938 he was a full general. Because he allegedly oversaw Buchenwald at one time, he was sentenced to life imprisonment in trials there in 1947.
He was allegedly released in 1950 for health reasons, though he was only 54. We can be sure he was never in jail for a second.
Next we come to Friedrich Fuertsch. He was a Lt. General and was captured by the Soviets in 1945. In 1950 he was allegedly sentenced to 25 years hard labor, but somehow was back in Germany within five years, just in time for the formation of the new Bundeswehr.
Did any ranking Nazi serve a full sentence, or anything close to it? I haven't seen one.
Fuertsch was found guilty of destroying the cities of Novgorod and Leningrad, including thousands of people and billions of dollars worth of art and architecture, but he was only sentenced to 25 years? What does it take to get the death penalty over there?
He came in as a Maj. General in 1955, and by 1957 he was a full general. He also was soon tapped for NATO in Paris, where he was deputy chief of SHAPE. In 1961 he became head of the German military.
The Foertsches in the US are related to the Zoellers, Summers, and Weavers, indicating they are Jewish. A search on “Foertsch Jewish” confirms that.
Finally, we have Heinz Trettner, who commanded the 4th parachute division as Lt. General. He too was tapped for the Bundeswehr in 1956, moving almost immediately to NATO in Paris, where he was commander of the logistics department.
In 1964 he became head of the German army and five-star general.
Both the Spanish and Russians filed complaints with NATO at the time, due to the fact that Trettner had been involved in the bombing of Guernica and Durango, attacks in Czechoslovakia and Norway, the destruction of Rotterdam, and the attack on Smolensk.
He was also implicated in a massacre of civilians in Veneto, so it is unclear why historians now know that but the judges at Nuremberg didn't. The West German government denied all those claims in 1964, but it hardly matters, does it?
If Trettner wasn't involved in those particular events, he must have been involved in others, right? I mean, this was a war. Are they saying that this Nazi Lt. General did nothing but sit in Berlin and eat ice cream sandwiches?
This famous maiden voyage of the world's most famous ship was strangely underbooked. The ship was at a little over half capacity, so it reminds us immediately of the planes that were said to have crashed on 911.
They were also about half empty. The Titanic could take 2,453 passengers, but only 1,317 were allegedly onboard. That's 53.7% capacity.
Also a red flag is the mainstream's pathetic attempt to explain this anomaly: there was a coal strike in the UK that spring, causing many crossings to be canceled.
Lloyds of London was the major insurer of the Titanic, and also one of the largest insurers of the Twin Towers. Well, do you want to guess who insured the Hindenburg?
The Hindenburg was insured for $15 million, or about $285 million in today's dollars. Wikipedia tells us $80 million in today's dollars, but someone there can't do math. Here is the policy: insurancejournal.com/news/east/2017…
Also like the Titanic and the airplanes on 911, the Hindenburg was mysteriously under-booked. There were (allegedly) 36 passengers and 61 crew aboard, though the ship could take more than double that. Strange, since this was the first transatlantic flight of the season.
You might think Avatar or Avengers:Endgame was the most popular movie of all time, based on box office totals. Or that Gone with the Wind was the most popular of all time. But neither one is even close to being the truly most popular, based on number of tickets sold.
They want you to think Gone with the Wind is the most popular, because of course it was huge propaganda about the Civil War, selling mainstream history. As such, they promoted it far beyond anything at the time, leaving it in theaters for more than three years.
It came out in late 1939, but was still on the charts in 1942. It wasn't re-released in those years like Star Wars later was, it was just left in theaters the entire time.
Saul and David, the first two Israelite kings, were both chosen by the LORD from among the people. It seems these kings were picked for their good looks: both are described as particularly handsome.
There also seems to be a very special relationship between king David, and Jonathan, son of the incumbent king Saul. At David’s first audience with Saul, Jonathan sort of falls in love with him, told with a word for soul, nephesh, (נפש), which also means “passion” or “desire”.
I say the French do some of the most entertaining fake street brawls.
Note at :16 where the guy in the red shirt gives a quick nod to tank-top boy to signal their choreographed “fight”. Note after getting nice and squared up for the camera.
About :27 where white shirt protestor bar arms an opposing protester (who has cleverly disguised himself with a neon yellow vest) and manages to slightly knock him off balance.
That is not nearly as disturbing as the following attack that occurs to neon-boy when a tall protestor in a black mask attacks him viciously with a … flag
Real-world data from areas with high COVID jab rates show a disturbing trend. For example, August 1, 2021, the director of Israel’s Public Health Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, announced half of all COVID-19 infections were among the fully vaccinated.
Signs of more serious disease among fully vaccinated are also emerging, she said, particularly in those over the age of 60.
A few days later, August 5, 2021, Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely ill COVID-19 patients are fully vaccinated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of COVID-related hospitalizations overall.