1/ Corporate media put the blame for Afghanistan on Biden and his numbers are dropping. But the entire process was sabotaged by Trump et al. What factors made media avoid all context and report "Biden Chaos?"
1) An inherent RW bias 2) Media wed to military industrial complex.
2/ On RW bias: Though NOT ONE US person has died in the evacuation, media had Republicans who lied about the election on speed dial, ready to pass their propaganda onto the nation. Scalise and Scott are known public liars. Tapper assisted by making an absurd Saigon comparison.
3/ In its rush to pass on relentless RW messaging, few in corporate media provided Americans with any of the ESSENTIAL context that Trump, Pompeo, Miller, et al sabotaged the effort. Trump released the leader of the Taliban from prison!
4/ Trump and Pompeo also released 5,000 Taliban prisoners. Then, they negotiated the withdrawal solely with Taliban, boxing out the Afghan government, destroying the will to fight amongst local leaders in an already very corrupt country. Taliban bribed all of them to surrender.
5/ Their sabotage was lengthy and ongoing and obvious to any reporter paying any kind of attention. They tanked the visa system. Corporate media was aware of these factors yet they refused to share with America during their breathless reporting of "DISASTER" and "EPIC FAILURE."
6/ We're even granted a real time look into the Republican strategy by @byamberphillips, WHILE corporate media was actively adopting that strategy. If you doubt RW bias, look at how she completely whitewashes the facts on Iraq. Then she normalizes Kevin McCarthy, a known liar.
7/ Reminder in all of this:
NOT ONE US person has died while Biden has been Prez. A country collapsed because of Trump sabotage and many Afghans panicked at an airport. Yesterday @nytimes convinces us of "MISCUE AFTER MISCUE" WHILE we are successfully evacuating thousands.
8/ So after the GOP gets media to say everything they want, totally absent of context, media does a sober accounting of how their handiwork has affected us all. They PRODUCED a story of chaos, with Republicans as directors, and hammered our perception with it. OPTICS! POLLS!
9/ We wonder where American's go the idea it was bad?
11/ War is big business. For 20 years the MIC had a cash cow on their hands. Those rich and powerful interest's desires are communicated to us by news outlets with strong military relationships. Here, @nytimes publishes the opinion we should remain in Afghanistan forever.
12/ Here's the bio of indefinite war advocate, Ryan Crocker:
13/ Here's more on media and military plus a fun screenshot of a WH correspondent suggesting just a little more light war: washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/styl…
14/ This adds up to why Biden is holding the bag for doing what the majority of Americans want and all with no US casualties. A successful withdrawal from Afghanistan is not what (majority lying) Republicans and the MIC want. Context isn't tough. It's omission is purposeful:
15/ News makes reality. And newsmakers have choices. An absolute TON of direct quoting of liars and shills for the MIC, blasted across network and cable TV news and in the press, will always overwhelm a couple of stories that get at the meat of the matter. The public suffers.
16/ While most Americans are busy as hell, news is produced in the background of their lives. Most are lucky to get the outline. Such irresponsible coverage of major events impacts our ability to obtain the information we need to self-govern and to select our leaders.
When it's all about optics, when biases within reporting aren't revealed, when the people in office who LIE to us about our elections are sought for their "analysis" of a political opponent, we remain in a vicious cycle. Our information diet becomes cheap and malnourishing.
17/ We demand truth, context and transparency in every piece of reporting. The alternative is killing us.
A🧵
Leading news orgs deceive the American people about the profound unfitness of Trump.
One way they do this is “sane-washing” the abnormal & his incoherency.
This is not journalism-it’s journalistic fraud & propaganda.
Editors of all 3 leading news orgs ran A1 stories. Giving prime real visibility. Instead of objectively reporting his pathologic incoherence. They cherry picked nuggets to report. “Musk” “efficacy commission”.
A 🧵The @nytimes is failing democracy & being run as a Trump/GOP protection racket. Editorial #FrontPage CURATION shapes narrative. What is - and isn’t prioritized - reflects opinion & bias. 1/n cc: @MarkJacob16 @ruthbenghiat @mtomasky @anatosaurus @AnandWrites @NewsJennifer
Given the breadth of PUBLIC information about corruption and impropriety this is long overdue.
Thank you @propublica for doing journalism. NYT is bitter and jealous about you receiving the Pulitzer for your heroic work.
NYT is vanishing SCOTUS corruption.
2/
@propublica .@AOC introduces substantial articles of impeachment.
NYT does not deem a New York Congressperson taking such a drastic measure #FrontPage worthy.
Is @nycscribe deciding whether such articles receiving a vote in a GOP-led House make it newsworthy? 3/
@jonathanvswan @maggieNYT @jdawsey1 @peterbakernyt @danbalz @semaforben @AsteadWH @nytimes @washingtonpost @WSJ @NBCNews @AP @CNN @CBSNews @ABC @MarkJacob16 @NewsJennifer @ElieNYC @NoLieWithBTC Trumps plan will kill and maim children AND defund public schools. There is no doubt of this.
#TrumpIsUnfit but corporate media refuses to say so. This enables and licenses Trump.
@PostGuild @NYTimesGuild have you any say in the newsroom? Is this the Fourth Estate?
ALERT: #FraudulentEuphemism
Editors’ language choices have tremendous impact on Americans understanding of our world.
Today WaPo normalizes dictatorship & makes destruction of American democracy sound sexy with: “muscular Oval Office”
1/n
@ruthbenghiat @mcopelov @Will_Bunch
This piece provides important context and “stakes” of the 2024 election. Thank you @bethreinhard
It’s unfortunate WaPo editors have softened the edges of the facts presented by their choice of euphemisms.
FYI “Post-constitutional” = dictatorship
2/ @TimothyDSnyder
@bethreinhard @TimothyDSnyder We need regular Project 2025 coverage and discussion of dictatorship and fascist movements, not soft-pedaling “violating norms of exec overreach”.
IDEA: How about a weekly Sunday deep dive A1 on Project 2025?
🧵BREAKING: Newsrooms Rush to Communicate That Trump's Felony Conviction Doesn't Matter
While many front pages prominently carried news of Trump’s guilt, our most influential newsrooms are already communicating to the public that they should not consider this a very big deal. 1/
Newsrooms can make a big deal out of, and paint as a beyond the pale scandal, anything they want. That they haven't made those choices for Trump suggests a willful desire not to. News execs are choosing to normalize Trump and downplay his disqualifying behavior. Terrifying. 2/
Would any other politician receive such framing? Consider, none of the articles had to be written at all. Each of those outlets could have chosen to use the occasion of Trump’s historic conviction to instead call for him to drop out of the race. Alas, a bizarre whitewash. 3/