SBC's interview with an autistic person about #Spectrum10K
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/id1…

"There are 2 broad types of autism research. There's basic research which is understanding the causes, that links back with genetics and environmental factors." 1/10+
"And then there's applied research, which could be directly relevant to autistic people's lives and their families lives. And that could be clinical, educational, it could be related to vulnerability or mental health or the world of work." 2
"And we do all of these different types of research. I think they're all important for different reasons."

My confusion:
Isn't the entire point of your Spectrum10K study to get autistic people direct support?

Couldn't you use those funds to do that right now instead? 3
SBC on suicidality in autistic people:
"Why do we do the studies? I think the research can be used to present to policy makers and local authorities to say 'look these are the risks, this is the current state of how autistic people are experiencing life, and put in more support."
Again.. I mean sure? But the genetic database research isn't going to solve any of that?

So much of the genetic research just seems like the actual wrong way to go about it. It's like it's the only tool he has in his toolbox to investigate these things or something.
Like maybe just toss the baton to a different researcher (an openly autistic researcher, even!) and have them do qualitative studies instead of what you're currently doing.

Maybe just decide to listen to autistic people when they tell you this is harmful (or will be).
autistic person: "There does seem to be some sort of genetic factors that pre-dispose.."

SBC: "I think that sounds right. That's why we want to do the study, Spectrum10K. We want to separate out the experiential factors & the genetic factors."

That's not how genetic data works?
"It could be..some of the anxiety just derive from the nature of autism. That if some autistic people find it difficult to sort of cope in a complex social environment, pressure to communicate, that can also be overwhelming..So there may be a sort of genetic element too."
Mentioned sensory hypersensitivity and that it might be genetic reasons, "and again we could make environmental adjustments to make it easier. We could ask autistic people what kind of lighting, sound levels make them more comfortable."
Doesn't require a genetic database!
"Genes have been found associated with autism. The science hasn't found all the genes yet. That's why we're doing that big Spectrum10K study...the genes for autism.. some of them are associated with disability, but some of them are associated with strengths or even talents"
"particularly in this pattern recognition skill" - then talks about how it's hugely advantageous to history/society/etc.

...right.. not eugenics.. not eugenics at all..
Omg, the autistic person asks about the empathizing-systemizing research that SBC does and I just had to pause it for a moment.

SBC said
1. it's not necessarily all genetics based.
2. SBC and others were able to correlate certain alleles to the systemizing part
[cont]
3. he says he understands why some people are uncomfortable with the research (that there are on average, differences between "males and females" on the empathizing/systemizing scale)

"because historically women have"
& then I paused it.

No mention of trans & nonbinary people?!
"a long history of discrimination against women"

Still nothing about trans and nonbinary people.
I mean really, please continue erasing us.. /s

then mentioned differences "of the mind between males and females."

[cont there's more]
and then he mentioned nonbinary people ONCE -

"I want to see a world where boys and girls, men and women, and those who are sort of nonbinary, are all treated equally."

Sigh.
"The 2 sexes, if we think of the chromosomal sex..what's the impact of only having 1 X chromosome or 2. We know that biologically males produce more of certain hormones prenatally.. testosterone. The level is twice as much in male fetuses as in female fetuses." (more brain stuff)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AutisticSciencePerson #StopShockingDisabledPeople

AutisticSciencePerson #StopShockingDisabledPeople Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AutSciPerson

13 Sep
I would like to find the genes for neurotypicalism so they can get better supports early in life.

Finding out this information will help neurotypical well-being and quality of life, and help with co-occurring conditions.

Please ask your neurotypical children to spit in a tube.
We have 3 neurotypical ambassadors, 4 neurotypical people on our annual advisory panel, and we're willing to consult with neurotypical people and their families after starting to recruit.

We can't disclose researcher's diagnoses so we can't answer about the researchers.
We are not looking for a cure for neurotypicalism but this research may in the future lead to a genetic test for neurotypicalism.

We are anti-eugenics.
Read 5 tweets
13 Sep
Just to clarify regarding the #Spectrum10K study..

Collecting genetic data of a very specific subset of autistic people who have official diagnoses will always be biased.

Using questionnaires made by NTs to describe autistic "behavior" will always be biased.
1/10
Something they note in their preprint is that SPARK didn't seem to have a lot of questionnaires. Most of them are parent-report.

Even if they have more questionnaires in the UK study, they will likely combine this with SPARK.

So any other questionnaires are going to be moot. 2/
I'm not sure how many samples they would need to correlate questionnaires to polygenic scores, but I bet it's more than 10,000.

I'm also assuming they'll use family without diagnosis as a control - which is not a true control. Don't remember if they do this in the preprint. 3/
Read 11 tweets
12 Sep
Every day that I have an outing,

and my venous malformation doesn't hurt me,
and doesn't hurt me the next day,

I thank my weird-looking, very ugly toe shoes. 💜

Took me a surgery that didn't work, and 3 years of going through footwear, but I finally found it.
Physically abled people will always have something to complain about.

They'd tell me I need to get foot surgery (part of the reason I tried it - 3 week recovery).

They'd joke that I should "just amputate it" (so overdone and absurd).

Now they tell me my shoes look ugly.
I don't usually say this,

but I will say fuck off to anyone who complains that my shoes look ugly and I need different ones or they're not appropriate for the occasion.

People not in pain simply have no idea.

I'd rather not be in pain everytime I take one step,
thank you.
Read 6 tweets
11 Sep
So,

I am going to talk about the #Spectrum10K study that is an online pre-print (assuming will be published soon)

that literally looks at the genes of autistic people.

And it's just as bad as a lot of other autism research.

Let me explain -
1/21
First of all, it's important to explain that they are correlating genetic scores (polygenic scores, which I'll get to later)

with checklists and questionnaires.

Please read this thread I wrote to understand why this is bad:


2/21
Now you may be wondering,

What are the questionnaires they are correlating these polygenic scores (the genetic scores) to?

Here's a list I found from the caption of Figure 3 of the paper.

NVIQ = non-verbal IQ,
VIQ = Verbal IQ,

3/21
Read 38 tweets
11 Sep
[near meltdown tweeet, all caps]

CAN ANY SINGLE NON-AUTISTIC PERSON READ THIS PAPER AND GIVE A GODDAMN SUMMARY OF IT SO THAT AUTISTIC PEOPLE CAN UNDERSTAND THIS AND I DON'T HAVE TO DO EXTRA RESEARCH + BE ANXIOUS ABOUT MY PHD WORK ON THE WEEKEND?

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
This research that has ALREADY BEEN PUBLISHED BY SPECTRUM10K

is crucial to pointing out the harms of this study,

and I don't have the fucking spoons to sift through the pathologizing.

I've seen 3-4 good ally responses to my blog post today.

BUT ONLY 3 OR 4. THAT'S IT.
In case you want a quick update about how autistic "advocates" are doing right now -

WE ARE NOT OKAY. NONE OF US ARE OKAY.

This is time-limiting because I wanted to talk about it at the panel tomorrow but I'm out of spoons to read through every single sentence. I can't.
Read 5 tweets
11 Sep
Spectrum 10K has already published a study about autism genes, trying to subtype autism, using multiple international genetic databases,

And no one's talking about it.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(