If the main researchers on the #Spectrum10K project really want to do right by autistic people,

if they truly "mean well" -
This is what they would do right now.

1. Hire & consult an independent autistic researcher to create an ethics committee around this DNA database.

1/9
2. Listen to them and let them create an ethics committee which encompasses a diverse array of background of autistic researchers, autistic parents, autistic non-speakers.

Only autistic people.

2/9
3. Create a survey to send out to the autistic (not autism) community which asks for their research priorities, questions about their opinions and feelings on data collection of DNA, potential issues they would have with it, if they think it would be helpful, etc.

3/9
4. Using the ethics committee of only autistic people (both autistic scientists and non-scientists), have them create stipulations for whether other researchers can share the database, whether potential "autism markers" would be shared or not (is it going to be published?).
4/9
5. Actually agree to what the ethics committee decides - Which may mean not publishing the "autism" genetic markers at all and only focusing on the medical surveys.

6. (this should be higher up) - Hire actual openly autistic researchers to collaborate on the highest level.
5/9
The biggest thing -
Give autistic people authority over how their data will be shared and whether or not it -will- be shared to anyone.

Why can this not be stipulated on the consent form in the first place?

Why do researchers act like that is set in stone & cannot change?
6/9
Is it really that hard to hire autistic researchers as main collaborators?
Do you really not believe that autistic researchers exist in biology, of all places?
If you want us to trust you, you have to actually do something to earn that trust.
7/9
You can't just create a committee of people (not even majority autistic) who agree with your plans and give you feedback on minor issues.
You can't just handwave us away.
You can't just harm this community and pretend like you never did anything bad.
8/9
You're actively hurting autistic people's mental health by advertising and being involved in this research. Isn't that antithetical to what you want to do? I don't understand it. I don't understand why allistic people refuse to do what is right.

Why not do what's right?
9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AutisticSciencePerson #StopShockingDisabledPeople

AutisticSciencePerson #StopShockingDisabledPeople Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AutSciPerson

13 Sep
I would like to find the genes for neurotypicalism so they can get better supports early in life.

Finding out this information will help neurotypical well-being and quality of life, and help with co-occurring conditions.

Please ask your neurotypical children to spit in a tube.
We have 3 neurotypical ambassadors, 4 neurotypical people on our annual advisory panel, and we're willing to consult with neurotypical people and their families after starting to recruit.

We can't disclose researcher's diagnoses so we can't answer about the researchers.
We are not looking for a cure for neurotypicalism but this research may in the future lead to a genetic test for neurotypicalism.

We are anti-eugenics.
Read 5 tweets
13 Sep
Just to clarify regarding the #Spectrum10K study..

Collecting genetic data of a very specific subset of autistic people who have official diagnoses will always be biased.

Using questionnaires made by NTs to describe autistic "behavior" will always be biased.
1/10
Something they note in their preprint is that SPARK didn't seem to have a lot of questionnaires. Most of them are parent-report.

Even if they have more questionnaires in the UK study, they will likely combine this with SPARK.

So any other questionnaires are going to be moot. 2/
I'm not sure how many samples they would need to correlate questionnaires to polygenic scores, but I bet it's more than 10,000.

I'm also assuming they'll use family without diagnosis as a control - which is not a true control. Don't remember if they do this in the preprint. 3/
Read 11 tweets
12 Sep
Every day that I have an outing,

and my venous malformation doesn't hurt me,
and doesn't hurt me the next day,

I thank my weird-looking, very ugly toe shoes. 💜

Took me a surgery that didn't work, and 3 years of going through footwear, but I finally found it.
Physically abled people will always have something to complain about.

They'd tell me I need to get foot surgery (part of the reason I tried it - 3 week recovery).

They'd joke that I should "just amputate it" (so overdone and absurd).

Now they tell me my shoes look ugly.
I don't usually say this,

but I will say fuck off to anyone who complains that my shoes look ugly and I need different ones or they're not appropriate for the occasion.

People not in pain simply have no idea.

I'd rather not be in pain everytime I take one step,
thank you.
Read 6 tweets
11 Sep
So,

I am going to talk about the #Spectrum10K study that is an online pre-print (assuming will be published soon)

that literally looks at the genes of autistic people.

And it's just as bad as a lot of other autism research.

Let me explain -
1/21
First of all, it's important to explain that they are correlating genetic scores (polygenic scores, which I'll get to later)

with checklists and questionnaires.

Please read this thread I wrote to understand why this is bad:


2/21
Now you may be wondering,

What are the questionnaires they are correlating these polygenic scores (the genetic scores) to?

Here's a list I found from the caption of Figure 3 of the paper.

NVIQ = non-verbal IQ,
VIQ = Verbal IQ,

3/21
Read 38 tweets
11 Sep
[near meltdown tweeet, all caps]

CAN ANY SINGLE NON-AUTISTIC PERSON READ THIS PAPER AND GIVE A GODDAMN SUMMARY OF IT SO THAT AUTISTIC PEOPLE CAN UNDERSTAND THIS AND I DON'T HAVE TO DO EXTRA RESEARCH + BE ANXIOUS ABOUT MY PHD WORK ON THE WEEKEND?

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
This research that has ALREADY BEEN PUBLISHED BY SPECTRUM10K

is crucial to pointing out the harms of this study,

and I don't have the fucking spoons to sift through the pathologizing.

I've seen 3-4 good ally responses to my blog post today.

BUT ONLY 3 OR 4. THAT'S IT.
In case you want a quick update about how autistic "advocates" are doing right now -

WE ARE NOT OKAY. NONE OF US ARE OKAY.

This is time-limiting because I wanted to talk about it at the panel tomorrow but I'm out of spoons to read through every single sentence. I can't.
Read 5 tweets
11 Sep
Spectrum 10K has already published a study about autism genes, trying to subtype autism, using multiple international genetic databases,

And no one's talking about it.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(