Bottom line, companies have delivered earnings like a .300+ hitter with 35+ hrs. But you're paying that hitter $35m+/yr (record salary). Good for now. But will this hitter earn its pay next year, and the year after?
1/8
As of August 23, 2021, 475 (95%) S&P 500 companies have reported Q2 2021 earnings with a beat rate of 87%, a new record. This compares to an average beat rate of 71% since the Great Recession ended.
2/8
Analysts expected YoY earnings of ~55%. The latest blended est. is ~ 95%. This jump of ~40% is record.
YoY earnings is compared to Q2 20220, the worst point of the lockdown, big base effect. This is why estimates for Q3 2021 earnings growth drop to 29% and 20% for Q4 2021.
3/8
Company guidance, an index of which is shown below, shows companies continue to see strong earnings growth.
It remains to be seen if more COVID restrictions or rising inflationary costs will dampen expectations for earnings in the future.
4/8
Hefty earnings growth is still needed. The 12-mo forward earnings P/E ratio, a Wall Street fav, is still quite high at 22.
Investors do not seemed bothered by these valuations. But should earnings disappoint, which has not been the case recently, investors may reconsider.
5/8
@5thrule argues that SPX valuation is made up of 3 parts:
* The current value of assets, or the book value
* The NPV of expected future earnings. Or, the median SPX earnings forecast by WS analysts for the next 3 years
* A residual component he calls “Hopes and Dreams”
6/8
Normally a market should factor in “Hopes and Dreams” as companies have flexible structures and can re-make themselves as needed. How much should this be?
The next chart shows “Hopes and Dreams” make up the largest part of valuation since the bubble peak of 2000.
7/8
Finally, market capitalization to GDP is also at a new record (the so-called Buffett Indicator).
So nothing about this market is cheap. But companies are delivering on earnings and they expect to continue to do so.
How long will they continues to is the question.
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It turns out that the biggest soap opera in Trump's nominations is the Treasury Secretary. As the graphic below shows, it is as close to 50/50 as it gets.
---
My Take
The Treasury Secretary gets to sit in the room and opine on policy. And their voice will be taken seriously.
But they do not set the policy; the President does. When the president says what they will do, they expect the Treasury Secretary to sell that policy as if it were theirs.
The second part, selling something they don't believe in but are told to do, is something Jamie Dimon will never do, so he will never be the Treasury Secretary. (Dimon wants to tell everyone else what they should sell).
Lutnick will sell whatever you tell him and do it with gusto! Bessert will do so too, but he does not command the room like Lutnick.
In other words, the Treasury Secretary is the administration's chief spokesman. This is a sales job, and it needs a salesperson.
The problem with Yellen was that she needed to be a better salesperson. Yes, she is an outstanding economist, but she was never a good spokesperson for the Biden Agenda.
She would have been a better National Economic Council head, the "smart person in the shadows advising the President."
If I had to guess ....
Lutnick = Treasury Secretary
Bessert = National Economic Council head
A good way to measure the perceived health of the US economy is to measure the public's ability to spend on things they want but do not need, aka discretionary spending.
🧵
2/5
The Conference Board's survey of 3,000 Households asking whether they are planning a foreign vacation in the next six months.
This month, the survey hit another all-time high: 22% of US households say they will vacation overseas in the next six months.
3/5
A foreign vacation is something that absolutely nobody needs but absolutely everybody wants.
You only agree to potentially spend several thousand dollars if you are confident about your job,
investments, and the overall state of the economy.