This is Guðni Thorlacius Jóhannesson, an Icelandic historian serving as the sixth and current president of Iceland. He took office in 2016 and was re-elected in 2020 with 92.2% of the vote.
His field of research is modern Icelandic history, and he has published works on the Cod Wars, the 2008–2011 Icelandic financial crisis and the Icelandic presidency, among other topics.
Guðni is the son of teacher and journalist Margrét Thorlacius and sports instructor Jóhannes Sæmundsson. His brother Patrekur Jóhannesson is a former Icelandic handball national team player.
He earned a bachelor's degree in history and political science from the University of Warwick in England in 1991 and a Master of Arts in history from the University of Iceland in 1997.
He has also studied German and Russian at university level. In 1999, he completed an masters degree in history at St Antony's College at the University of Oxford. In 2003, he received a PhD in history from Queen Mary, University of London.
Guðni decided to stand for president on 5 May 2016. Before his candidacy, he had appeared frequently on live television to provide commentary and historical context in the wake of the Panama Papers scandal.
A scholar of the Icelandic presidency, Guðni delineated on live television the options available to incumbent president Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson and other Icelandic political actors. After his television appearances, there were calls for Guðni to run for the presidency himself.
His platform included support for a citizen initiative referendum provision in the Constitution. Guðni was unaffiliated with any of Iceland's political parties and said he would be a "less political president" than his predecessor due to a lack of partisanship.
Guðni took office as President of Iceland on 1 August 2016. At 48, he was Iceland's youngest president. Roughly one month into his term, Guðni had approval ratings of 68.6%.
Early in his term, Guðni had to oversee negotiations to form a government in Iceland in the wake of the 2016 Icelandic parliamentary election on 29 October.
These negotiations were difficult, as no pre-election coalition had a majority, and all possible majority coalitions had parties with highly divergent policy positions.
In December 2016, Guðni had approval ratings of 97%. Such high approval ratings for Icelandic politicians are without precedent. In April 2019, his approval rating was 93.5%.
Although raised Catholic he left the Catholic Church due to its delayed and muted response to reports of criminal abuses by priests.
He says his credo is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, "human beings are born free, equal in dignity and rights. Humans are endowed with reason and conscience and should act in the spirit of brotherhood towards each other."
Guðni attracted international attention in February 2017 when he jokingly vowed to ban pineapple as a pizza topping. bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/artic…
Iceland is a parliamentary republic. The president is elected to a four-year term by popular vote, is not term-limited, and has limited powers.
The president signs bills passed by the Parliament into law and can choose not to sign them, thus in effect vetoing them. Bills vetoed by the president still take effect, should the Parliament not withdraw them, but they must be confirmed in a referendum.
However in practice the president exercises very limited power and for most of the time is a ceremonial head of state. Iceland is another example of a nation governing themselves without the patronising need for 'royals' to be above us as head of state and first family.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Republic

Republic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RepublicStaff

27 Aug
“President Blair” is up there with some of the more daft arguments from monarchists. Firstly Blair has already done ten years as PM, a position far more powerful in terms of domestic politics than a US president. The alternative to the monarchy is not a US style constitution.
It’s a parliamentary republic in which political power is shared between government and parliament, with a limited constitutional role for the president.
Blair and the other ex-prime ministers who get mentioned are ex for a reason. It’s highly unlikely they get elected or even stand. However, if they did stand and were popular enough to win then it’s absolutely right that they get in.
Read 6 tweets
26 Aug
In 1975 Australia's Governor General, John Kerr, sacked the prime minister. Kerr always said that he hadn't told the Queen what he was planning and that his decision was made in the final days and hours. Thanks to a legal challenge by @palaceletters we know this isn't true.
Kerr acted unconstitutionally. The PM, Gough Whitlam, had the confidence and support of the lower house. Kerr also acted months after coming up with the idea, and wrote numerous letters to the Queen, telling her of his plans.
The Queen, whose role is supposed to be advising and warning the PM, said nothing to Whitlam about Kerr's plans and said nothing to Kerr to stop him from sacking the PM.
Read 5 tweets
15 Mar
The Crown Estate does not fund the monarchy: A Guide.

The Crown Estate pays 100% of its profit to the treasury. This would continue in a republic. The government funds 100% of the Sovereign Grant. That would not continue in a republic.
It was George Osborne and the Coalition government who, in 2011, invented the Sovereign Grant and created a link to Crown Estate profits.
But the link is nothing more than a calculation the treasury makes to determine how big the grant should be. And it's only a ratchet clause. If CE profits fall the grant remains the same as previous years. If CE profits rise then the size of the grant goes up.
Read 7 tweets
10 Sep 19
In his evidence to the Commons committee in 2012 @GrahamSmith_ told MPs:

"We are supposed to be a democratic society, and our sovereignty ought to lie with the people, not the Crown or Parliament. It ought to be the people who are the fount of honour.
It is the people who ought to be rewarding and recognising their fellow citizens, and the monarch ought not to have a place in this process at all...
put in place a process involving an independent committee...the rules of that process ought to be entirely in the hands of a cross-party parliamentary committee.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(