So am at my mum’s and I found a charity cookbook she co-edited in 1989 (in aid of the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford). Most of the contributors were local but they also approached some distinguished figures of the time and… well, here is haute cuisine a la Ken Clarke.
And, in something of a coup, courgettes a la Maggie.
The book - ‘Friendly Food’ - is now out of print. But it’s a reminder of how late the culinary revolution came to the country - and indeed how long the spirit of deference lingered…
Another coup - a recipe from one of the Royals
Gravlax from Blenheim
The Speaker’s nut roast - I love his explanation for being vegetarian…
Beans on toast and an egg cocktail from Tony Baldry - the ‘salmonella-free!’ is a lovely period detail…
Raymond Blanc went a bit OTT for the target market, but as my mum says they couldn’t exactly turn him down…
And a contribution from a Mr Richard Stein of Padstow
Mrs Archbishop
And a few other highlights to finish
I should stress - the bulk of this is useful local recipes. But I found it a fascinating insight into how quickly tastes and attitudes have changed - and am pretty impressed with my mum for pulling it together.
I can't believe that @Ed_Miliband is still using that £300 figure, but here is a quick recap of why it is hugely misleading - in fact, nakedly dishonest. (1/?)
The report comes from Ember, a pro-green consultancy set up by Bryony Worthington, a Labour peer and Miliband ally. It claims, as does Miliband, that 'a clean power system saves UK households £300 per year'.
But that is massively out, for two reasons. First, it takes its starting point the level of the energy price cap in Q3 2023, of £2,074 - which was still hugely elevated as a result of the Ukraine crisis. It has now fallen to £1,717.
Hugely important paper from @CPSThinkTank today - showing significant and repeated left-wing bias among all of the most popular LLMs on questions of politics and policy. (1/?)
For the paper, @DavidRozado asked 24 LLMs a range of neutral questions:
- To propose multiple policy ideas for the UK/EU
- To describe UK/European leaders
- To describe UK/European parties
- To describe various mainstream ideologies
- To describe various extreme ideologies
@DavidRozado For the UK and EU, we asked for ideas on tax, housing, environment, civil rights, defence, etc etc. In total, we ended up with 14,000 policy proposals for each. More than 80% were left-coded, often markedly so.
The @ONS has published its latest stats on smoking. And it's good news! In 2023, smoking fell to the lowest level on record in every part of the UK. (1/?) ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
In particular, there has been a sharp and continuing rise in the number of people who have quit smoking. But as this chart shows, that didn't coincide with any new ban. That sudden spike upwards since the mid-2010s matches the rise of... vaping.
In fact, young people have seen the largest rise in vaping, and the largest fall in smoking. (Age ranges don't quite overlap, but you get the picture.)
Over the years since the Second World War, the great cities of the West have grown and thrived. But there is one big exception. The boundaries of London still sit where they did when the builders down tools in 1939. Why? The green belt. (1/?) thetimes.com/article/labour…
If you look at a map of New York (source animation here ), or Macron's plans for 'Le Grand Paris' (), you can see how capital cities have grown and can grow. vimeo.com/297249350 capx.co/revealed-how-p…
But in London, street after street on the edges simply... stops.
As the GB Energy Bill passes second reading, a quick reminder of how incredibly dodgy the maths behind Labour's energy policies is. (1/?)
Labour has promised to completely decarbonise the electricity grid by 2030. Most experts think that's completely impossible, at least without spending very, very large amounts.
Still! Labour has promised not only that we can do this, but that it will save everyone £300 on their bills. But there are big, big problems with this number.
Are the Southport riots a turning point for Britain? Do they reveal something new, hideous and broken about our society? Lots of commentators are saying so, very loudly. But there's still a strong chance - if you go purely by historical precedent - that the answer is no. (1/?)
When the London riots happened in 2011, I wrote an op-ed on '10 ways in which these riots will change Britain'. There was universal agreement that they would do so (as well as some extraordinary attempts to argue that this just proved what the writer had been saying all along).
But a much more accurate version of my article would have been just two words: 'They won't.' In fact, when I looked back on almost a decade of my political blogging, the main predictive error I made was to think that whatever was in the headlines that week would shift the dial.