The problem for the military that this video highlights is the same problem all institutions have right now in the age of social media -- universities, professional guilds, orgs of all kinds: you can't have randos in your ranks speaking to the world on behalf of your group.
In an earlier, saner era, no member of the military would be able to spend institutional creidibility by donning a uniform & address the general public on whatever random matter. No MD or nurse would be able to spend hospital or uni credibility by doing the same, etc
Any public-facing comms where the person even appears to speak for the institution or is associated visually in any other fashion with the inst. would have to go through a press office & be vetted, & delivered by trained professionals.
But now, you can get dressed up in professional garb, put your institutional affiliations in your bio, & mouth off about whatever even explicitly wrapping yourself & your words in the authority & credibility of those institutions.
We can either have institutions or we can have this foolishness. We gotta pick, because we can't have both. Health care professionals, academics of all types, military, law enforcement -- they all have to either get off social media, or we have to develop a new set of norms...
...that firewall their speech from that of the institutions they're affiliated with. If these folks are going to be on social media, then they'll have to not be there in any kind of professional capacity. Again, we can either have institutions or we can have this, but not both.
Everyone needs to look at what has happened to my profession (the media) when we let everyone floss their credentials & affiliations & then publish a torrent of hot takes & opinions. Everyone needs to look at how that same sorry fate befallen public health, & the consequences.
Because God help us all, the military is now headed in that same direction. People at every level of the hierarchy in every branch are getting in uniform & addressing the public on divisive political issues all over social media. Mark my words, this will end in violence on CONUS.
The person in this video needs a court martial, & Twitter is full of academics who go straight to the public wielding their institutional creds who need to be either fired & given ultimatums. No more of this stuff, man. We can't have a society this way.
I rant this way because I do indeed want to hear what academics & other professionals think. But I want to hear some vetted consensus, vs. the hot mess of crusading, feuding, clout chasing, culture warring, & boundary policing we have happening now on the hellsite & on FB.
Ok this impromptu rant kinda blew up, so I feel compelled to clarify: I have benefitted personally & professionally from the early, free-wheeling pandemic Twitter discussions among specialists on my "Outbreak" list. It was huge.

But despite all that, it was a net negative.
As much as I got from that list & from Twitter early on, I find the infospace & discourse to be so poisoned as to be unusable. And in hindsight, society would have been better off had those professionals done had all that back-&-forth in a more closed, curated online forum...
... or under a much different set of norms & practices meant to firewall their institutions from their online presences. So I've benefitted from a thing that, in hindsight, I now think was bad & should be ended immediately. We screwed up.
I also feel compelled to say that not everyone has been irresponsible. There have been some real stand-outs who've wielded their institutional credibility on social platforms very responsibly & effectively. But the few who also happen to be good at Twitter are not the problem!
For every 3 professionals with X credential who are explicitly swinging that credential around on here to get the public to listen to them, at least 2 of them are bad at Twitter & are acting a fool in the eyes of ~30% of the population. This is so, so bad. Again, it's gotta stop.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with jonstokes.com

jonstokes.com Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonst0kes

26 Aug
Back before "Biden is sundowning" was a GOP talking point, it was a thing a handful of lefties talked about during the primaries, sometimes privately & sometimes on Twitter. I'm sure all the tweets have been deleted tho. Anyway, @jshieber is our bet still on?
@jshieber How many people besides me remember this chatter from the primaries about how people close to Biden knew he was in bad shape on the campaign trail? This was definitely A Thing, especially before his poll numbers picked up.
@jshieber There were some tweets from some larger accounts to the effect of "when are we gonna talk about how our frontrunner is sundowning. This is the thing everyone knows but is scared to discuss." I actually developed my impression of his problems /from lefty chatter/.
Read 4 tweets
26 Aug
Both the dogs we recently rescued are super mega cute & we're now having second thoughts about letting someone adopt one of them b/c we kind of want both. It's nuts tho because then we'd be a five-dog family (2 outdoors + 3 indoors). 😮
We're pretty sure the one standing up (girl, ~2yrs) is the mother of the one laying down (boy, ~10months). She's extremely attached to him & protective of him.
The current Stokes menagerie contains:
- 5 dogs (3 existing rescues + the 2 new rescues)
- 2 bunnies
- 3 horses

That's a lot of critters, at least for me it is.
Read 6 tweets
26 Aug
Not surprising, given that they've been running full out and their order book is way backlogged. I should've seen this coming when Apple mentioned they'd see shortages in high-end semis affecting their product availability in the fall.
Most of the HN thread on this is lazy "blame crypto" takes from butthurt nocoiners, but this is a great comment: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=283146…

That last sentence is exactly what I worried w/ my talk of a possible "semiconductor industrial crash" months ago. jonstokes.com/p/significant-…
This line specifically: "the guy who posts here all the time saying he works for the company that makes the machines that makes the chips and they can't make more machines because they don't have the chips that go in them." Circular dependencies abound.
Read 5 tweets
24 Aug
I want to say something that I think is important & overlooked about the low vaccination rates in some southern states, like my home state of Louisiana:

It's widely known that in these states, folks don't trust government & won't vote into being a robust public sector. But why?
The std answer is that they're all a bunch of racists, & they don't vote for public sector benefits because THOSE people might also benefit & we can't have that. (This is the line, say, @MonicaBPotts, feeds the yankees in the NYT.) Racism is real, but it's not the whole story.
The bigger piece is that the governments in these states are terrible, so nobody has ever had any experience with even functional government, much less good government. And unlike in, say, CA, there's no massive wealth to paper over the dysfunction & graft with taxpayer dollars.
Read 11 tweets
24 Aug
Counterpoint: every ancient coin had the head of some deity or deified ruler on it. Money has always been explicitly about authority, morality, divinity, the sacred. The idea that it could be amoral -- mere plumbing or infrastructure -- is an innovation (& a good one!).
The closest thing the ancients had to a bank was the temple. Disaggregating the sacred and the commercial is one of the great benefits of secularism. And the rollback of that innovation via Woke Capital is yet another example of how fundamentally illiberal woke ideology is.
Cryptocurrency is actually about preserving this liberal separation between money and morals, and advancing it. This regulatory fight matters. We either go forward or backward from here.
Read 4 tweets
23 Aug
I think it would be super helpful to have a standardized test for "ability to visualize things in your mind, based on minimal input." B/c in my experience it's hard to work with ppl on a visual design project if they can't visualize & you don't know it. nytimes.com/2021/06/08/sci…
I worked w/ a guy like this once, & I prepped him repeatedly before showing him some black-&-white wireframes from the designer, that we were just doing information architecture & would actually do the design later. So he looks at them & says some nice things about them...
... and I can tell he wants to say something negative but he's trying to figure out how to package it so as not to be too harsh or offend me, then he finally says, "but Jon, these are not in color. It is important for the website to have colors." 🤦‍♂️
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(