REVERSE ENGINEERING: WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE GENETIC CODE WITHIN THE PFIZER VACCINE?
(thread)
What does the mRNA code in the Pfizer vaccine tell us about the genetic design decisions, its safety, possible impact on our health, and the "quality" of FDA BLA approval?
This is going to be A LONG thread; I will review the code after the introduction. As usual (with my posts), please use the "show replies" option multiple times to unveil the whole thread.
The FDA's approval to Pfizer's Biological License Application (BLA) stated "...our review of information submitted in your BLA application...did not raise concerns or controversial issues that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion."
This thread is a follow up to previous threads I've written. I highly recommend reading "COPTIGATE - THE WORST DESIGN FLAW IN HUMAN HISTORY THAT IS IMPACTING YOUR HEALTH" in order to get the context; use "show replies" to expand the thread.
The wonder of the mRNA vaccine (which was invented by @RWMaloneMD) is that it allows us to use our cell's own mechanisms of generating proteins (ribosomes etc.) to generate the proteins we wish, by using a genetic code encapsulated in a lipid.
This leads us to two important questions: 1) What is that code? 2) what does it produce?
We have been told that the mRNA vaccine generates the spike protein of the original SARS_CoV_2 virus, and this trains our bodies to develop antibodies to the spike protein. IS IT?
As I've written in the past, Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, and AstraZeneca all use Codon Optimization (CO) techniques in order to find a way to generate large amount of spike proteins with the intention of "training" your body to recognize the virus when it will see it.
It was known to manufacturers and regulators (since 2011) that CO is an issue, but since all the manufacturers got an exemption from submitting their products as gene therapy treatment and went via the normal vaccine process it was not checked as part of the approval.
Because "refusal to measure risk IS ALWAYS an indication that someone knows there is a real problem", let us look at the way the Pfizer mRNA code was designed as a case example to the risks both the FDA & Pfizer has chosen to ignore.
In December 2020 Bert Hubert wrote an excellent article called "Reverse Engineering the source code of the BioNTech/Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine", and in it he explained (to mortals like us who are not geneticist) the mRNA code structure.
Kira Smith published a paper pointing out problems within the genetic code of the Pfizer vaccines ("BNT162b2 Vaccine: possible codons misreading, errors in protein synthesis and alternative splicing's anomalies", March 2021)
HOWEVER, I received a feedback from some "scientist" who "explained" to one of my readers that they should ONLY listen to scientists & MD who are experts in their field, and not to ... (multiple personal insults toward me & Kira Smith lol)
So... how about a paper published in an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal monthly online by MDPI, which is affiliated with The American Society for Virology (ASV)?
Professor Xuhua Xia (@XuhuaX), an evolutionary biologist who work in the University of Ottawa (11696 Citations), published in vaccines (Jul 2021) "Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines."
Professor Xia's paper covers both the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA products, and in this thread I will be focusing only on his review of the Pfizer product.
My purpose is to allow you to understand how design decisions impact product safety, how it can impact your health.
The protein created by the Pfizer vaccine IS different from the spike protein of the original SARS-CoV-2, to try and stabilize the resulting spike protein.
The protein carrying these substitutions and additional furin site mutations is known as S-2P.
1) S-2P is an unstable protein. 2) S-2P's receptor binding domains (RDBs) are in an up (open) state, which doesn't train the body correctly as the original spike RDBs are closed.
Because our cell attacks foreign genetic code, The Pfizer mRNA code replaced all the U letters (nucleotides) in it with Ψ letters to hide itself, which increases the probability of misreading the code and generating a different spike protein than what was expected.
At the end of the Pfizer mRNA there is a codon (3 letters) which acts like a stop signal. However, U in stop codons was replaced by Ψ, which increase the probability of either not generating the spike protein OR generating a longer protein with a harming effect.
Since mRNA optimization is based on highly expressed protein coding genes, and since the the Pfizer vaccine is "administered through muscle injection, it is relevant to characterize features of highly expressed muscle genes."
Because the muscle cells barely have any antiviral protein called ZAP, it suggests that the "spike mRNAs in the vaccine injected into muscle cells will not be subject to ZAP-mediated RNA degradation"
The 1st level of codon optimization is done on codon families: there are 'CGN' codons (CGA, CGC, CGG, CGU) and there are 'AGR' codons (AGG, AGA). Most of the SARS_CoV_2 virus is encoded by AGR codons to avoid the antiviral ZAP proteins which target foreign CGN codons. #COptiGate
PLEASE DO NOT RETWEET YET!
Much more to come below...
If you arrived here and there is nothing yet... PLEASE COME BACK.
Press the "Show replies" to see the rest of the thread.
"Show replies"
👇👇👇👇
As you can see below, in the Arg residues (R) ribosomal protein genes, the Pfizer product has reduced AGR codons by 8 while increasing the corresponding CGN codons by the same amount (compared to the original SARS_CoV_2).
The compound codon family for Leu (L) optimization is similar: the UUR codons (UUA & UUG) have been completely replaced by CUG, and almost all of the CUA, CUC, and CUU codons have been replaced by CUG.
The 2nd level of optimization is done within a family, where a fundamentalist strategy was taken. As you can see, Pfizer chose "CGG as the optimal codon in the CGN codon family and recorded almost all CGN codons to CGG".
1) The codon compilation of human genes in EMBOSS showed that CGG is slightly more frequent than CGC. 2) We have 4 tRNA genes to decode CGG, and 6 tRNA to decode CGA and CGG.
However: 1) EMBOSS was created in 1993-1994 and did not focus on highly expressed protein coding genes. 2) "Nearly half of human tRNA genes are not expressed"
The better codon to use was CGC. "THE DESIGNERS OF THE VACCINES,..CHOSE A WRONG CODON AS THE OPTIMAL CODON."
More optimization:
Ribosomal protein genes favor G-ending codons in every 2-fold R-ending codon family; C-ending codon is the optimal codon for 2-fold Y-ending codons family, and U-ending codons recorded to C-ending codons to prevent wobbling.
"The codon optimization...leads to a much increased codon adaptation index (CAI) and index of translation efficiency (ITE)"
however...
"THE CODON OPTIMIZATION IN THE PREVIOUS SECTION SUFFERS FROM LACK OF CONSIDERATION FOR TRANSLATION ACCURACY", because it has not taken into account the misreading rate.
@XuhuaX gives an example of E. coli, where AAC is heavily used, and AAU is rarely used.
The tRNA misreads AAC and AAU, and the misreading error rate is six times greater for AAU than for AAC.
Is the optimization for increased efficiency, or accuracy, or both?
One theory to identify if optimization is for increased efficiency, accuracy, both is by looking at the sites optimized. If optimization is for accuracy, conserved sites (functional) and variable sites (limited functionality) will be optimized differently.
"IT IS IMPORTANT FOR VACCINE mRNA TO BE TRANSLATED ACCURATELY BECAUSE MISINCORPORATION OF THE WRONG AMINO ACIDS WOULD CONFUSE OUR IMMUNE SYSTEM IN TARGET RECOGNITION"
GOptiGate
After we looked at the optimization, let us look at other elements of the mRNA code, such as the translation initiation sequence, which is important because it can limit the rate of translation, and it depends on The Kozak consensus sequence, and a secondary structure. #COptiGate
The Kozak consensus is a sequence that enhances the translation initiation. For mammalian genes it is GCCRCCAUGG, where AUG is the start codon."
Pfizer uses GCCACCAUG, but not the codon after that, to prevent unpredictable changes in the spike protein.
Next in line, the 5'-UTR. The genetic code starts with a 5'-UTR area and ends with the 3'-UTR. 5'-UTR serves two key functions: to stabilize mRNA and to facilitate scanning by small ribosome subunit to localize the start codon".
Pfizer has chosen human α-globin as their 5'-UTR, with minor modifications to the Kozak consensus.
Translation Termination Signal:
Pfizer uses two UGA stop codons (UGAUGA). "studies suggest that UAA...is more efficient than other stop signals", and "UGA is the leakiest" when it comes to accuracy.
"The Pfizer termination signal may not be the optimal choice."
Because there is a possibility of a frameshift (bad reading), where due to read error the stop codon will not be recognized, "UGA is a poor choice of a stop codon, and (THE) UGAU (due to the UGAUGA sequence) in PFIZER... vaccines COULD BE EVEN WORSE"
"The efficiency of translation termination is primarily determined by a tetranucleotide termination signal consisting of the stop codon and the first nucleotide immediately 3' of the stop codon."
Tetranucleotide Termination Signal:
"the optimal stop signal should be UAAA instead of UGAU/UAGU/UAAU in the two mRNA vaccines."
Because Pfizer has changed all the U letters to Ψ, the stop signal in Pfizer is ΨGAΨGA. As Ψ can pair with A,G (and less extent to C and U), it is more prone to misreading, and since UGAU can lead to a frameshift, ΨGAΨ may do the same.
Pfizer's 3'-UTR is combined of a human AES/TLE5 segment of 136 nt with two CΨY mutation + 139 nt
of a human mitochondrial 12S rRNA (mtRNR1), a combination of SELEX and borrowing from nature.
And as someone just sent me, @RWMaloneMD published a research paper that shows the dangers of frameshifted protein translation, which was described as a real concern in @XuhuaX paper.
1) The S-2P spike protein is not training correctly the body's immune system 2) mRNA not optimized correctly 3) mRNA not optimized for accuracy, lead to creation of different proteins 4) mRNA Can generate harming longer proteins
HOW THE HELL does Pfizer get from the FDA approval for a Biologics License Application of a gene therapy which is NOT optimized for accuracy and has so many flaws?
I'll tell you how: THEY NEVER REALLY CHECKED IT.
Ignorance is bliss for Pfizer, who gets to make HUGE profits from shipping a product with so many design flaws that if it was a car it would have been recalled faster than you can say Jack Robinson.
Ignorance is bliss for the FDA who isn't really held accountable for anything.
Ignorance is NOT a bliss to everyone who trusted our medical regulators.
NOT EVEN ONE REGULATOR across the globe has looked at this Pfizer product as a gene therapy. NOT EVEN ONE.
Yesterday I realized why people hang on to the dream that they can get their pre-COVID life back. They hang on to this dream, like I hang on to my dream I can have my life back.
People are terrified to see the truth, like I was terrified to see it.
Here's the 2nd clip from the interview I had with Tina Griffin from The Counter Culture Mom Show, about the level of regulatory oversight on these experimental gene therapies.
THE GLOBAL IT OUTAGE YOU WITNESSED WAS NOT AN ACCIDENT!
IMPORTANT! The purpose of this thread is to explain non-IT and to non information/cyber security professionals why I believe the outage you are seeing around the world due to the update from #Crowdstrike is not an accident.
Before we begin - introduction.
Hi everyone. My name is Ehden Biber. I'm known as the person behind #PfizerLeak, and most of my writing here on X/Twitter has been on ph@rma related topics. HOWEVER, my professional work has been information security and cybersecurity.
My credentials include:
· Head of information security in Metro Bank (UK).
· Merck/MSD Information security office for Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA).
· Consultant to insurance and financial institutes.
The opinion you are about to read is based on YEARS of experience.
"MEDICAL GENETICS…WILL BE THE SOUL OF PERCISION MEDICINE IN EVERY FIELD"
It is time to expose another member of the W.H.O. science council and her views on genomics and gene therapy (mRNA). Introducing Dr Mary-Claire King.
[Thread]
[1/7]:
[2/7]
Doctor Mary-Claire King is a very known geneticist who has discovered in 1990 BRCA1,which was the first gene for a hereditary form of breast cancer. She is a professor of genome sciences in the university of Washington, Seattle, USA. medgen.uw.edu/people/mary-cl…
[3/7]
Her later work was focused on the genetics of schizophrenia, she is recognized as a pioneer in the development of DNA sequencing for human rights investigations, and she is also a Senior Associate Core Member of the New York Genome Center.
THE COUNCIL: INTRODUCING THE W.H.O. SCIENCE COUNCIL THAT IS ABOUT TO CONTROL YOUR LIFE.
As we approach the final stages of the #WHO coup d'état attempt, it is time to expose the group of unelected people who will control your future and their alarming agenda!
#TheCouncil
[Thread]
2/ In December 2023 the WHO produced a report that sets the stage to radical changes that soon will be enforced all the citizens of the world: make gene therapy (mRNA) key technology in the fight against infectious diseases, cancer, and combat any resistance to such technologies.
3/ It called to develop new gene therapy treatments against pathogens, promote investment in "equitable" development of the technology, use it as THE medical countermeasure mechanism to tackle pandemic threats, and to combat any resistance to the technology ("misinformation").
@robinmonotti 1) He uses the exaggerated Hamas dataset. 2) He uses a definition of children for anyone under 18 years old. 3) He say Palestinians were expelled in 1948, but don't mention many left because Arab nations told them to so they can butcher Jews in the war they started.
More below.
@robinmonotti 4) He compare the number of children who died to the sum total of children died 3 years before. He does not compare it to the number of children who died in other conflicts IN THE REGION, such as in Syria. That like comparing apples and pears.
More below.
@robinmonotti 5) The definition of who is a Palestinian by the UN is ANYONE WHO LIVED IN THE MANDATED PALESTINE FOR TWO YEARS prior to June 1848! No ancestors required!
This also made Egyptians who escaped Egypt not to become work slave in the creation of the Suez canal into Palestinians.
THE AZ STUDY: Why did AZ asked to withdraw their EUA marketing authorisation approval, and how come you didn't hear about it?
Short answer: BECAUSE THEIR LONG TERM SAFETY STUDY SHOWN THAT THEIR COV!D19 SH0TS K!LLED AND HARMED PEOPLE.
Long answer: READ THE THREAD!
#TheAZStudy 1/
2/ As you might have heard, AstraZeneca ASKED in March 2024 to have their COV!D19 SH0TS product approval withdrawn from Europe's EMA. It was not the European Union (EMA) who decided to withdraw their approval due to the damage they caused people. BUT WHY?
3/ To understand what happened, let's start with a QUICK, SHORT reminder (the following 3 posts) before we will go into the details.
I promise you it's worth reading!
29 JANUARY 2021: EMA recommends COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca for authorisation in the EU ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-re…
MURDER, THEY PLANNED.
The mechanism in which the spike protein impacts the mitochondria, and how it leads to myocarditis, heart attacks, cancer, and neurological disorders such as face paralysis, Alzheimer and Parkinson's disease.
Highlights from my latest article.
[THREAD] 1/
2/ In order to encode proteins (including the spike protein), the cells are using a mechanism called tRNA so that the ribosome could translate the mRNA sequence to a protein (or more correctly, to translate each codon to an amino acid).
3/ tRNAs acquire their specific amino acids through a process known as aminoacylation, facilitated by specialized enzymes called Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetases (AARS). The process is fuelled by the energy derived from Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP), created by the mitochondria.