By their own admission, Prostasia is not merely a child protection org. They fight "the abuse of human rights in the name of children," "bigotry" & "unchecked government surveillance." They don't mean bigotry against or surveillance of children. 
https://twitter.com/Sturgeons_Law/status/1431707224091594755
All feelings re: NB, puritan panics, uncritical disgust reactions, etc, aside, IMO it's clear that one of their main goals is advocacy for the rights of pedophiles, even if just non-offending ones, & not just as a way to make kids safer. They should just be explicit about this.
They might even have more success that way than by pretending the tortured "not ALL child abusers" takes or pro-lolicon & child sex doll advocacy are really part of an evidence-based approach to keeping kids safe.
You can see the issue in this pro-doll piece. It argues that banning dolls = bad bc 1) there's no evidence linking them to real sex crime, 2) not all of them are used sexually, 3) those that are aren't seen as proxies for kids,
prostasia.org/blog/dolls-pre…
prostasia.org/blog/dolls-pre…
4) slippery slope to banning all sex dolls, 5) it violates privacy, 6) dolls might help pedos not offend against kids, but there's no data about this. In other words, 90% of the article is about protecting doll fetishists' & pedos' rights. Only the last point is about kids.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
