I know there's a lot of anti-zoning sentiment in the US but I want to point out arguments for zoning, including SFH. In Poland, zoning varies from non-existent to lax. As a result, Poland is zoned for 330 million people - nearly 10x its population. Some cities are zoned for 20x. 
Lack of stricter zoning causes its own unique problems, starting with infrastructure planning. What size of water pipe do you need? Should you plan for a tram line or will bus suffice? These are not trivial questions.
In Warsaw's Białołęka district, the city expected mostly SFH and duplexes. Instead, developers built multi-story buildings. As a result, in the morning and evening, water pressure is too low to reach the third floor.
Elsewhere, particularly in Kraków, ADU-like structures are so close to neighboring properties that you get no sunlight
For new developments built by utilizing the lax zoning to the extreme, Polish people coined a word "patodeweloperka" (pathology + developer). Here's a great Facebook page showcasing examples from around the country: facebook.com/Patodeweloper
100 lat planowania ("100 years of [urban] planning") is another meme that originated on SkyscraperCity forums and shows practical implications of lax zoning: SFH next to a tire exchange garage next to a steel and glass skyscraper next to a dilapidated tenement housing.
The thread on SkyscraperCity is hilarious to anyone speaking Polish, but one of the examples of lax planning is the so-called Polish frontage: a row of wall-to-wall buildings in all different shapes, sizes, styles (or lack of them) and colors. No rules, no consistency.
Here's the thread btw: skyscrapercity.com/threads/polska…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
