Dan Sohege 🧡 Profile picture
Aug 30, 2021 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Thread: Okay, so setting aside, for now, the seeming implication made here by @ClareFoges that people seeking asylum in the UK should avoid acting "foreign", there is quite a lot which is just plain wrong. 1/
For starters, this is not a "fair assumption" in the way it has been phrased. The UK actually takes relatively few refugees compared to other countries, and the vast majority remain in countries neighbouring the one they fled, 73% to be exact. 2/
Reading the news you may be forgiven for thinking developed nations are being "overwhelmed", but reality is that 83% of refugees are in developing countries and 39% are hosted by just five countries. So, however you cut it, the UK is always going to take proportionally fewer. 3/
I will move past the "Britain's generous instincts" line, as repeated studies have shown that is just demonstrably false for the majority, and move onto the implication that channel crossings are to blame for the mess of the asylum system, rather than Home Office failures. 4/
Despite an increase in people crossing the channel, of whom 98% apply for asylum, the overall number of applications is down by about a quarter on the previous year and actual grants of asylum down by around half. 5/

gov.uk/government/sta…
Next up, that "hostile to Britain" line. It's a tried and tested one I will grant, but its also more than a bit disingenuous. As multiple studies have shown, refugees are among the least likely of all groups to actually be terrorists. 6/
Put it this way, a refugee reaching the UK, particularly if travelling via "irregular routes" has to cross multiple international borders, face multiple different authorities etc. There are easier ways to enter a country if you are planning on breaking the law. 7/
Okay, all things considered here, this is maybe considered a minor point, but the "UN Convention on Human Rights" isn't actually a thing. I assume it was meant to be the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Might help to get the name right when misrepresenting it. 8/
Do I need to get into why the word "ghettos" here is just plain dog-whistling or can I assume that it is so obvious I can move onto remaining issues? 9/
Yep, yes that is a slur in fact, not to mention, as @GoingMedieval points out, just factually inaccurate. 10/
I am all for providing better and more support to asylum seekers, but what is being put forward here isn't a "two way street". It's a highly loaded argument that if someone wants to seek safety they must "conform" exactly. Essentially, they need to lose their unique identity. 11/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Sohege 🧡

Dan Sohege 🧡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stand_for_all

Jun 29
Deep breath. Oookay then. Seeing as an earlier thread of mine has generated, shall we say some unfortunate abuse. Let's have a little deep dive into why criticism of Badenoch, Rowling etc is not misogynistic and just reality. 1/
Firstly, let's address the "oh look a man telling women what they think". No, absolutely not. There are numerous issues I will not ever try and talk about because I recognise that I do not have the knowledge or life experience to do so. 2/
I will comment on things such as the gender pay gap, way in which the right to choose with regards to abortion is being criminalised, terrifyingly high rates of sexual offences, and equally terrifyingly low rates of prosecutions etc, because they are things we can all see. 2/
Read 21 tweets
Jun 20
It's #WorldRefugeeDay, so, let's have some facts about those seeking asylum, not more divisive hatemongering. Firstly, most of those seeking asylum in the UK do so because they have existing ties here. That's why arguments such as "France is a safe country" are meaningless. 1/
If you have fled from war or persecution your concept of "safety" is going to be very different from someone going on holiday. You want to be somewhere you know people, have a community, and speak the language. That's why no amount of "deterrents" will stop people coming. 2/
They may not be able to receive asylum, but that is secondary to feeling safe within communities they know. With what are known as "family reunification routes" being all but shut down, people are left with no option but to make dangerous crossings. 3/
ein.org.uk/news/reports-s…
Read 17 tweets
Jun 17
Okay, deep dive into Reform's "contract" and what it says about immigration. Not a great start when the opening gambit is such a clearly misleading statement. Crucially here they are including arrivals, and ignoring people who left, this obviously changes the figures. 1/
Image
Image
You cannot accurately predict immigration trends over this period of time. They are too susceptible to change. Figures like this are used frequently to scaremonger about immigration, but the reality is that picking numbers out of a hat would be as accurate. 2/ Image
An often used argument by Reform, but not really substantiated. Housing stock is a particularly interesting one, as government policies are more to blame for a lack than immigration, and immigration has little to no real impact on wages, for example. 4/
migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/brie…

Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
May 10
THREAD: The thing about asylum policies is they do need to be practical. No-one who is serious about this disagrees. There's a lot of posturing and grand standing, by all parties, but at the end of the day people do want to see channel crossings reduced and sensible policies. 1/
58% of people polled agree that we should allow either current numbers of people seeking asylum or more. The number of people who want to see fewer though has been increasing, and that needs dealing with. 2/ Image
When it comes to voters counting immigration, in particular asylum, as a priority you can actually track the salience of the issue reasonably accurately based on the amount of press coverage it receives. As soon as it is off the front page the importance for many people drops. 3/
Read 25 tweets
Mar 28
I have, technically, been on annual leave this week, which just means being stuck in my own head and worrying about work ahead of going back next week. So let's have a little dive into being #ActuallyAutistic and being unable to switch off, along with a couple of other things. 1/
First and foremost, the next person to tell me I should "just switch off" will likely cop some harsh words. Why do people say that? Do they think that they are suggesting something which no-one ever thought of before? 2/
If I could switch off I would. It isn't an option for me though, and, yes, I've tried a lot of different techniques. Part of it is worry, part having an ingrained dislike of people making decisions about me without talking to me, which does seem to happen a lot when I am off. 3/
Read 23 tweets
Mar 22
I'm begging @UKLabour to shelve the rhetoric of "our cruelty will be more competent" on asylum. Anyone who knows enough about this subject to comment knows returns just create a cycle of exploitation and harsher border policies force more people into irregular routes. 1/ #r4today Image
Instead of criticising @Conservatives for incompetence, @UKLabour should be focused on their inhumanity. All the evidence shows that if you want to reduce people using irregular routes, and thereby tackle gangs, you need to make it safer and simpler for people to seek asylum. 2/
As someone can only seek asylum once in the UK, that means things like removing carrier liability fines, which prevent people from being able to fly in, use a ferry etc, and therefore force them into having to rely on gangs. 3/
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(