Thread: Okay, so setting aside, for now, the seeming implication made here by @ClareFoges that people seeking asylum in the UK should avoid acting "foreign", there is quite a lot which is just plain wrong. 1/
For starters, this is not a "fair assumption" in the way it has been phrased. The UK actually takes relatively few refugees compared to other countries, and the vast majority remain in countries neighbouring the one they fled, 73% to be exact. 2/
Reading the news you may be forgiven for thinking developed nations are being "overwhelmed", but reality is that 83% of refugees are in developing countries and 39% are hosted by just five countries. So, however you cut it, the UK is always going to take proportionally fewer. 3/
I will move past the "Britain's generous instincts" line, as repeated studies have shown that is just demonstrably false for the majority, and move onto the implication that channel crossings are to blame for the mess of the asylum system, rather than Home Office failures. 4/
Despite an increase in people crossing the channel, of whom 98% apply for asylum, the overall number of applications is down by about a quarter on the previous year and actual grants of asylum down by around half. 5/
Next up, that "hostile to Britain" line. It's a tried and tested one I will grant, but its also more than a bit disingenuous. As multiple studies have shown, refugees are among the least likely of all groups to actually be terrorists. 6/
Put it this way, a refugee reaching the UK, particularly if travelling via "irregular routes" has to cross multiple international borders, face multiple different authorities etc. There are easier ways to enter a country if you are planning on breaking the law. 7/
Okay, all things considered here, this is maybe considered a minor point, but the "UN Convention on Human Rights" isn't actually a thing. I assume it was meant to be the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Might help to get the name right when misrepresenting it. 8/
Do I need to get into why the word "ghettos" here is just plain dog-whistling or can I assume that it is so obvious I can move onto remaining issues? 9/
Yep, yes that is a slur in fact, not to mention, as @GoingMedieval points out, just factually inaccurate. 10/
I am all for providing better and more support to asylum seekers, but what is being put forward here isn't a "two way street". It's a highly loaded argument that if someone wants to seek safety they must "conform" exactly. Essentially, they need to lose their unique identity. 11/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I am actually begging @BBCNews to at least attempt a little thing called "journalism" when reporting on people seeking asylum, rather than just being a Home Office stenographer. At least try and include context, rather than just quoting stats. #r4today. 1/ bbc.com/news/articles/…
Here's the thing, small boat crossings tend to follow the same pattern, even if numbers change, due to something called "the weather", shocking I know. Numbers change for small boats though as other policies kick in preventing people using alternative, safer, routes. #r4today 2/
For example, restrictions on visas have forced more people into using irregular routes, and as there is no such thing as a visa to seek asylum they have absolutely no alternative but to use the irregular routes. #r4today 3/
Yesterday four people, including a child, died crossing channel. On Monday at least 48 people died reaching Djiboutian. At least 68,123 people died trying to reach safety in the last decade. We need cooperation to make it safer to seek asylum, not harder. standard.co.uk/news/politics/…
People know the risks they are taking by using irregular routes. Most aren't looking at social media thinking, "I was going to stay here and face almost certain death, persecution or abuse, but now I have seen this TikTok video I'll risk my life on dangerous routes."
We've seen similar policies play out before, e.g. when the previous government tried it with Albania. They just don't work. With asylum, people tend to choose the country they seek it in for highly personal reasons, primarily existing ties. They aren't risking their lives for fun
Setting aside the illegality of the Rwanda Policy, which Germany can't get around by just passing a law to say that an active dictatorship is "safe", and the inhumanity of it, the plan is even more unworkable for the continent than the UK. 1/ #r4today bbc.com/news/articles/…
Okay, first off, the numbers issue. Rwanda, a country of the size of Wales and the most densely populated country in continental Africa, has the capacity to take and process claims of about 200 people per year. Simple maths shows it is pointless. 2/
It has also been tried before. Israel attempted a similar scheme, which led to about 4,000 people being trafficked from Rwanda into Europe within a matter of weeks of them being dumped there, and that scheme was voluntary not forced. 3/
THREAD: Much as I personally believe Nigel Farage is a racist and revels in spreading hate, I have some issues with the way people are saying the far-right riots we are seeing right now are the #FarageRiot. It's too simplistic and ignores decades of hostile rhetoric. 1/
Last time I brought this topic up I was accused of "both siding" things, so let's quickly clarify this. Both siding would be if I was trying to say there are "good people' on the far-right. I am not. Sorry, "legitimate concerns" went out the window when violent attacks started 2/
I am not defending, or deflecting, from what Farage has done, The point here is that when you make him the focus you risk ignoring the decades of hostile, and racist, anti-migrant, rhetoric which have embedded this scapegoating of migrants in public consciousness. 3/
Long thread; A lot of the violence we have seen over the last few days has been stoked by years of misinformation about migration, often from many of the politicians condemning it now. So, let's address some of that misinformation. 1/
Crime: In Britain, there is no correlation between higher levels of immigration and increased violent crime. Migrants are statistically, and proportionally, less likely to report crime though, and more likely to face hate crimes. 2/
Now, I know that people have bought into the whole "grooming gangs" line, but, again, this is a myth. It's the "frequency illusion" in action. The reality is that grooming gangs are far more likely to be white, British, men. 3/
. ucl.ac.uk/news/2020/dec/…
Since I wrote this thread on @UKLabour's Asylum and Immigration policies several things have been depressingly clear. First off, things are going to get worse. Cooper's announcement of increased immigration raids, and the blinkered defence of them by some, shows this. 1/
The second is how much harder it is going to be for organisations and individuals fighting for migrants' rights. A lot of support over the last 14 years wasn't "pro-migrants rights". It was "anti-conservative". Obviously this isn't new though. 2/
We saw shades of it after the Brexit referendum. People who claimed to be progressive pushing a "good/bad migrants" narrative dividing EU and non-EU migrants. I saw first hand a lot of the hypocrisy of those individuals then, and see it repeating on an even larger scale now. 3/