M.🦋 Profile picture
31 Aug, 20 tweets, 4 min read
THREAD: Congress-RSS collaboration

The growth of the RSS has not been without the support of Congress.

In the 1950s, Pandit Govind Ballabh Pant was not just the Chief Minister of the United Provinces but also a man close to Nehru.
The genesis of the mosque-temple controversy in Ayodhya is owed to Pant who, in 1949, did not take action when the idols of Lord Ram 'mysteriously' appeared beneath the central dome of the Babri.

Nehru directed Pant to have the idols removed but he expressed his helplessness.
The district magistrate of Ayodhya K.K. Nair, refused to remove the idols and resigned from the Indian Civil Service.

Now how does one explain Pant's sympathetic attitude towards the most important RSS leader to date- Guru Golwalkar?
Pandit G.B Pant was the Chief Minister from 1950-54 when the RSS drew up a plan to cleanse Muslims from the areas around Muzaffarnagar in Western UP.

By focusing on Muzaffarnagar as the point of ignition for communal polarization on the eve of 2014 elections which brought...
...Narendra Modi to power, Amit Shah was only following an old script.

According to Rajeshwar Dayal, the first Home Secretary of UP, RSS chief Golwalkar was directly involved in 'a diabolical plan to destroy Muslim economic power.'
Dayal records an episode of a very 'grave nature' about the UP Cabinet's indecision which resulted in dire consequences.

When communal tension was at fever pitch, Dayal records:

'the Deputy Inspector General of Police of the Western Range; a very seasoned and capable officer..
....B.B.L Jaitley, arrived at my house in great secrecy.'
He was accompanied by two of his officers.

They brought with them two large steel trunks, securely locked.

When the trunks were opened, 'they revealed incontrovertible evidence of a dastardly conspiracy to create a...
...communal holocaust throughout the Western districts of the province.'

The trunks were 'crammed with blue prints of great accuracy and professionalism, of every town and village in that vast area.'

Worse, they prominently marked out Muslim localities and habitations.
There were detailed 'instructions regarding access to the various locations.'

It all pointed to a heinous conspiracy.

Alarmed by those revelations, Dayal immediately took the police party to the Chief Minister's house.
There, in a closed room, Jaitley gave a full report of his discovery, backed by all the evidence contained in the steel trunks.

Dayal notes that timely raids conducted on the "premises of RSS" had brought the massive conspiracy to light.
'The whole plot had been designed under the direction and supervision of the supremo of the organization himself. Both Jaitley and I pressed for the immediate arrest of the prime accused, Shri Golwalkar, who was still in the area.'

'Pantji' (the CM) couldn't doubt this evidence.
But even so, instead of agreeing to the immediate arrest of the 'ringleader as we had hoped', he asked for the matter to be placed for consideration before the Cabinet at its next meeting.

Dayal was under no illusion about what was going on.
He wrote:

'There was also other political compulsions, as RSS sympathizers... were to be found in the Congress party itself.
It was no secret that the presiding officer of the Upper House, Atma Govind Kher, was himself an adherent and his sons were openly members of RSS.'
At the Cabinet meeting which Pant had called to consider the evidence against Golwalkar, 'there was the usual procrastination and much irrelevant talk.'

The fact that 'the police had unearthed a conspiracy which could have set the whole province in flames and that the officers..
...concerned deserved warm commendation hardly seemed to figure in the discussion.'

And what was the outcome of the deep deliberations of these worthies?

A letter was to be written Golwalkar 'pointing out the contents and nature of the evidence demanding an explanation.'
In fact Pantji asked Dayal to prepare a draft.

He recalls with some irony:
'the letter was to be delivered forthwith and two police officers were assigned for the purpose.'

But in the meantime Golwalkar had been tipped off.
He escaped and was nowhere to be found.
'He was tracked down southwards bit he managed to elide the couriers in pursuit.'
This 'infructuous' chase continued from place to place and weeks passed.

Pant later became Union Minister in Nehru's Cabinet.
After Dayal's testimony, how does one explain Nehru's elevation of Govind Ballabh Pant as the Union Home Minister?

Was Nehru complicit?
Or are we to continue to grant him the benefit of doubt?
In the style of Congress' dynasties, Pant's son, K.C. Pant, rose to become the Union Defense Minister.

But, not inconsistently, he and his wife eventually joined the BJP.

Of such stuff was the Congress aversion to 'communalism' made!
Reference:
1. A Life of Our Times by Rajeshwar Dayal
2. Being the Other: The Muslim in India by Saeed Naqvi

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with M.🦋

M.🦋 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_Shams11

15 Sep
Hindu bias elements in the Indian Constitution:

Article 1: Name and territory of the Union (1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States

The naming of India as Bharat reflected the power of the Hindutva-minded sections of the Constituent Assembly who wanted the name...
...to reflect the ancient pre-British and pre-Muslim era of a 'glorius' Hindu past.

The symbolic significance of 'Bharat' in the opening article was meant to suggest a sense of Hindu ownership of the new India- the India which was perceived to have achieved self-rule after...
...centuries of foreign rule.
The name Bharat signified the birth of a new India, with whose government and state the Hindus felt a sense of identification.
Read 23 tweets
7 Sep
Communal killings in Hyderabad, 1983

On September 7, a mentally handicapped Muslim leaving a mosque threw a stone at a Hindu temple.
This incident of stone throwing at the temple created tension in the area and the man was arrested immediately.
On 8 September, as revenge, a mosque in the compound of Allwyn factory was desecrated by P.Narendra (BJP MLA) and his men.

An idol was installed inside and pictures of Hindu gods were put up. The fans were damaged and the copies of the Koran were thrown into an ablution tank.
Soon the news spread and the AIMIM gave a call for bandh.

When the Chief Minister Mr. N.T. Rama Rao came to know about the bandh call, he called a meeting of the Majlis leaders and requested them to withdraw the call.
Read 16 tweets
7 Sep
Who ruled when major communal violence took place- 1967 onwards :

1. 1967- Hatia Ranchi
Dead- 183
Ruling Party- Jana Kranti Dal
CM- MP Sinha

2. 1969- Ahmedabad
Dead- 512
Ruling Party- Congress
CM- Hitendra K Desai
3. 1970- Jalgaon
Dead- 100
Ruling Party- Congress
CM- Vasantrao Naik

4. 1979- Jamshedpur
Dead- 120
Ruling Party- Janata Party
CM- Karpoori Thakur

5. 1980- Moradabad
Dead- 1500
Ruling Party- Congress
CM- VP Singh
6. 1983- Nellie, Assam
Dead- 1819
President's Rule
PM- Indira Gandhi (Congress)

7. 1984- Bhiwandi
Dead- 146
Ruling Party- Congress
CM- Vasantdada Patil

8. 1984- Delhi
Dead- 2733
PM- Rajiv Gandhi (Congress)

9. 1985-Ahmedabad
Dead- 300
Ruling Party- Congress
CM- MS Solanki
Read 6 tweets
6 Sep
However much we may disagree with the objectives and with the pompous and xenophobic style of the Hindu nationalist movement, we have to admit that the movement has grown and come to power largely by obeying the procedures of parliamentary democracy.

(1/4)
This opens the larger question of the forms that democratic discourse and practices have historically taken in India.

Was the political culture of the so-called liberal middle class, which provided the backbone to the independent nation-state, ever liberal and democratic?

(2/4)
Or was it rather dominated by a paternalist nationalist discourse within which ordinary Indians merely provided the necessary but uncomfortable numerical strength?

Is Hindu nationalism really revealing the dark side of the Hindu middle-class culture...

(3/4)
Read 4 tweets
7 Aug
The accepted wisdom in the United States for the last 75 years has been that dropping the bombs on Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, and on Nagasaki three days later was the only way to end the World War II.

Not only did the bombs end the war, the logic goes, they did so in the most...
...humane way possible.

However, the overwhelming historical evidence from American and Japanese archives indicates that Japan would have surrendered that August, even if atomic bombs had not been used — and documents prove that President Truman and his closest advisors knew it.
The quarter million slained at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not killed to hasten the end of the war against Japan and thereby "save lives", as the subsequent myth has been spread.

The Japanese government was already seeking to surrender before the bomb was dropped.
Read 17 tweets
5 Aug
August 5 now joins the list of anniversaries of colonial violence punctuating "post"-colonial time.

For a people who have witnessed mass killings, mass blindings, mass torturings, mass disappearances, mass incarceration, mass rapes and house demolitions, 5 August was another....
...story to commit to collective memory; not a beginning, not a diversion, not a rupture.

It was continuation of decades of illegitimate exercise of power and yet another totalitarian attack on Kashmiris per se, and this event marked the transition of Kashmir from militarized...
...territory to a proper settler colonial state.

As far as Article 370 is concerned, it was already rendered hollow by successive Indian governments ( Congress and BJP) and by Aug 2019 it was a mere shell and had only the symbolic element.

To put it mildly, its removal was....
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(