This is an increasing number of dudes’ excuse for not having to care about other people, but the cost-benefit analysis is almost exactly the same as it was a year ago: moderate mitigation versus mass death
When someone says “it’s not tenable that I have to wear a mask for indeterminate period of time so your parents don’t die” what they’re trying to do is figure out a way they can excuse not caring if your parents die
But a lot of people aren’t vaccinated. You hate the idea of that you might have to protect anyone you see as undeserving at any cost to yourself, so you’re using “They could have gotten vaccinated” as a justification for not caring if they live or die.
I mean, if your view is that we should just cordon off the unvaccinated and let them die, okay, but say it. Don’t hide behind this whole “Well there’s just nothing left we can do to slow the spread, time to fully reopen” BS
This isn’t even entirely true, but even if it were, so what? Is your view that a stupid decision not to get vaccinated should mean your life suddenly doesn’t count?
What I hate is that all these guys think they’re liberals, but it’s just by habit. Clearly, presented with a question like “should addicts be left to die in the street” as a matter of first impression, they’d be yelling about personal responsibility like a Fox and Friends host
“You had the information and could have made better choices” - like you’re a conservative. That’s a thing, many people are, but just admit it.
No, people who don’t get vaccinated aren’t “scabs,” Jesus Christ. They’re people making a lousy health decision for probably-silly reasons. They’re also family, friends, fathers, mothers, children
But look at how hard all the dudes are straining to not care. That’s the core thing. They do not want to care. They are fighting the idea that they need to care, tooth and nail. They want the serenity of having a good political rationale for not caring.
Literally mocking the idea we should care about children losing a parent to COVID
“We shouldn’t have to protect the unvaccinated, who made a bad decision” - again and again, self-styled progressive white dudes are demonstrating that scratch one inch below the surface and they become personal responsibility conservatives
I find the reflexive blaming of Manchin and Sinema so bizarre. I mean, yes - they’re a huge obstacle. But the idea that two senate votes render the party that controls the White House, House, and Senate powerless? A party that represents well over half the country?
The idea that America’s tens of millions of Democrats should simply accept that their priorities and their preferences are meaningless and cannot be expressed at all, except to the extent they reflect the priorities and preferences of these two Senate dilettantes, is insulting
If 48 senators, the White House, and a House majority strongly desired dramatic action, and then 2 senators were bottling it all up, don’t you think you’d detect a teensy bit more frustration with the state of affairs? Instead of “Oh well, that’s that! Maybe after midterms!”
People like to say “You just can’t accept that Manchin and Sinema won’t ever change their mind and there’s nothing more Dems can do,” but that argument would be more persuasive if obscure party figures like Joe Biden didn’t also publicly support the filibuster.
Pretty funny max pressure campaign we’ve got on, where the White House virtually buries filibuster-obstructed legislation of vital importance to focus on an infrastructure package that can get through reconciliation. Probably nothing else could possibly be done, though, right?
I mean I don’t watch cable TV but I’m guessing barely a day goes by where you don’t see moderates like Coons or Warner getting worked up on the news about how we HAVE to kill the filibuster to pass Biden’s agenda? I mean, unless Dems are lying about pushing as hard as they could.
What a great, blunt, honest thread by Sen. Smith. This is what I wish elected representatives would do more of: lay out what needs to happen, lay out how they want to get there, tell us honestly what the obstacles are, and then focus on removing them. Thank you, senator.
But with that said, here's a really serious problem: while it's great for Dems to admit the votes aren't there, it can't be that the ONLY response is "vote harder."
Tell us which members of your caucus are the obstacles (especially if it's not just the obvious ones), and PRESSURE THEM. It's not acceptable to say the problem is recalcitrant Dems and then not even tell us who needs to pressured or replaced.
This is literally the plan. Three years from now abortion will be illegal in 20 states and it'll be reported as "Restrictions threaten rights guaranteed by Roe, some liberals say"
They'll be able to do this because our political media refuses to treat any view contested by a partisan as provably incorrect, even if that view is "You have a constitutional right to abortion in America, a country where many states ban abortion"
Republicans will no doubt be raising millions and millions by promising to overturn Roe for years to come, long after Roe has been wiped away
I try to wrap my head around this and I just can’t. ICUs are clogged and thousands are dying and your concern is… that we’ll slide into permanent dining hall closures? Why would that happen, even? Who wants that?
James the thing you’re missing isn’t that outdoor mask mandates aren’t kind of silly but that it’s a minor problem and your evaluation of these policies is entirely driven by your own personal proximity to them
Nate’s ongoing issue isn’t really with any specific policy with but with the basic concept of public health, and the idea one group might need to sacrifice to keep another group healthy.
Nate Silver and a lot of dudes like him have been on a mission to convince us the pandemic was over and life should go back to normal the moment they personally felt safe. The idea it might impose on them unfairly is only aspect of COVID they seem to care about
I mean he’s literally arguing in favor of letting the disease spread freely because attempting to prevent new cases would interfere with his hot vax summer. And of course any cases among the unvaccinated in adjacent communities are just irrelevant