In the peak of the BLM protests, activists pleaded with America *back then* about what would happen *now* --

"Support us when it's not trending"...

@TheBeatWithAri
"Trending” captures our current era, where virtually all topics — even state-sanctioned murder — are reduced to their “viral” elements.

An issue or stance becomes “hot,” then fades like it’s some sort of fashion...
The sign's from last summer; @kendricklamar tackles the same theme in his new song:

"I thought you'd known better
I been ducking the pandemic [and] social gimmicks
I been ducking the overnight activists
I'm not a trending topic / I'm a prophet!"

arimelber.substack.com/p/open-this-em…
If there was an urge to “support” BLM and equality last summer, what does it mean to continue that today?

Police are killing Americans at the same rate this year as last year.

arimelber.substack.com/p/open-this-em…
The evidence shows which reforms actually *impact* policing:

The key variable is reforms that mandate *independent authority" over police...

rather than police policing themselves

Take body cameras - a feature of how we think we understand (some) policing incidents.

The majority of incidents caught on body cameras are *never* released by police, according to a recent study.
A "reform" to "add more cameras" without mandating *who* controls them may not deter much excessive force

It is still subject to the original dilemma in American policing — that police largely get to police themselves.
You don't need a study to see why *citizen* videos of police conduct have a larger immediate impact than police body cameras.

The police do not have control of citizen videos in the first place.
The video of Floyd's murder spread so fast, some officers were still falsely claiming Floyd died in a medical incident — a cover story that was shredded by the public video.

People forced facts into the system that otherwise would never have come to life.
arimelber.substack.com/p/open-this-em…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ari Melber

Ari Melber Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AriMelber

24 Aug
Many in Washington are getting Afghanistan wrong, again.

"There is a real chance" the decision to exit Afghanistan will spark problems there that "destroy Biden’s presidency."

- Ian Bremmer
A lot of the D.C. critique of withdrawal isn't *even about* what the ideal foreign policy should be -- but whether withdrawal will hurt Biden with the public... which *supports withdrawal.*

arimelber.substack.com/p/the-media-ge…
Read 4 tweets
2 Aug
Do you think more Americans are on Twitter or Tik Tok?
The vast majority of Americans aren't on Twitter.
Over 75% of Americans don't use Twitter or Tik Tok, per Edison.
Read 4 tweets
30 Jul
Dr. Fauci on why Delta is making Covid surge now:

Delta has a great "capability, effectiveness and efficiency in going from person-to-person. Its transmissibility is really quite competent."


[@TheBeatWithAri interview ]
THIS.

Dr. Fauci on why you should get vaccinated in *one* sentence:

"99.5% of U.S. Covid deaths are among unvaccinated people."

arimelber.substack.com/p/a-new-warnin…
Fauci is also measured on young people's perspectives, saying:

It's true "they generally don't get into trouble, but they *do sometimes get seriously ill*...

Read 5 tweets
20 Jul
On the Supreme Court, justices go to great lengths to tout American democracy for the nation — while avoiding its trappings in their own work.

They do not organize themselves by party.

They do not negotiate with each other over rulings.

They do not endorse political views..
.. Justices say they follow the Constitution’s edict, that only by *avoiding politics* can the judiciary be an effective *referee for democracy.*
SCOTUS passed one partisan test:

Whether to take cases questioning the election, as demanded by a President who gave three of the justices their lifetime jobs.

The court rejected *even hearing* any of those suits, because Trump's lies had no merit.

msnbc.com/msnbc/can-amer…
Read 5 tweets
29 Jun
More signs point to imminent charges in the Trump Org case...

Prosecutors "are likely to issue one or more criminal indictments this week.”

reuters.com/world/us/ny-pr…
That is close to what Trump's own lawyer said -- this week or next.

And while prosecutors can give targets the chance to "make a case" against charges, it rarely, rarely reverses planned charges.
Corporations are *not* people -- but they *can* be indicted....

#TrumpOrg
Read 7 tweets
25 Jun
NYT: The NY D.A. has now directly told Trump's lawyers the D.A. may indict the entire Trump Organization.

nytimes.com/2021/06/25/nyr…
We have been reporting on how the D.A. may use his legal authority to "try to indict the Trump Organization" itself -- like in this June 2 report on Trump's exposure:

The former deputy to D.A. Vance wrote the guidance for when to indict an entire company, last week we broke down those legal factors for whether to indict Trump Org:

Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(