This is a great post. I think it comes down to this: As a country, we needed to give rural White Americans some sort of identity they could be proud of other than Confederacy-style white supremacy. We failed to give them one.
Of course the blame for this lies with Republicans who stirred up racial resentment for votes, etc. etc. We all know that story. But what did we liberal elites do to push back on this? Nothing. We ditched the rednecks and fled to hippie college towns and cities on the coast.
Getting picked on by rednecks as a kid sucked. So what did liberal Gen Xers and Millennials do? We moved out. We didn't stay and work to build a real nation out of the people who gave us a hard time. We got college degrees that allowed us to escape to better places.
This was an understandable move on our part. America is a big place, with room to spread out -- or at least it was, before social media. No reason to spend your life among people you don't fit in with. But it's not very conducive to nation-building.
America's decades of "live and let live" -- what Bill Bishop calls "The Big Sort" -- made life easier for a lot of people but weakened our national cohesion. So now we have rural and exurban Red America waving the flags of dead slave empires.
Now social media has changed the game. We can't spread out any longer. We're all in one room together. Mobility, in the substantive sense, has vanished. Meaning we have to become a real, unified nation once again. That's happening now, and it's a painful process.
And like it or not, the ideology that's going to re-unify America will be based on the thing we call "wokeness". A pushback now underway will limit it, but overall it will become the basis of the new consensus for how we define our sense of nationhood.
America has always been fundamentally a liberal nation, guided by elite "Enlightenment" concepts but animated at a deep and fundamental level by a crusading Protestant-inspired racial egalitarianism. That is what gave birth to wokeness.
Much of this Protestant-inspired grassroots egalitarianism comes from Black people obviously, but much also comes from White people animated by a Protestant-inspired crusading spirit.
To me, @willwilkinson, who wrote the article I linked above, typifies this spirit.
The children of the Confederate-flag-waving exurbanites will mostly be woke -- sometimes painfully, awkwardly, excessively so. Wokeness' fervor will die down, but like a prairie fire it will burn outward to the limits of its fuel supply.
We've entered what I call a Time of Consolidation -- a time of nation-building when we renegotiate who we are as a country and create a new consensus identity that will carry us through the rest of this century.
It's still possible that the nation will break up, of course, but I don't think it will. I think we'll reaffirm our identity as a crusading liberal racially egalitarian nation (even though we will carry out many policies that violate that identity).
The story of liberal Gen Xers and Millennials will thus be this: We ran away from the rednecks, but we built an Internet by which we could transmit liberal values back to rural and exurban areas from our coastal and college-town enclaves. And that worked.
It will take more years, and probably more important historical events, before we become a nation that thinks of itself as a nation again. But the neo-Confederate rebellion will fail, as the original did. It's already in the cards. We are, and will be, a liberal nation.
(end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After watching many hours of sword comparison videos, I can now confidently state my assessment that a katana is, in fact, better than a medieval longsword, but a zweihander is better than a nodachi.
The reason for the former is that longswords were made to be highly versatile weapons, but this meant that you had to be an expert in each particular use (cutting, thrusting, close-in fighting) in order not to screw it up, which basically negated the benefit of versatility.
And the reason for the latter, ironically, is that zweihander were even more versatile, but since they were only used by a few specially trained troops, this was actually a strength rather than a weakness.
The wars in the Middle East and North Africa -- and the Muslim world in general -- seem mostly to be winding down, and wars are springing up in other regions.
1/A quick thread about the origin of "Nigerian aircraft carrier", generally regarded as my most far-out idea (because I haven't told you the even crazier ones)...
2/I was walking through Shibuya with a Canadian friend of mine who lives in Japan, and he was telling me how he'd been reading about the bizarre racial supremacy theories that Japan's militarist leaders promulgated in the 30s and 40s.
3/In some ways, these theories were the mirror image of Western theories of White supremacy, as detailed in the book "War Without Mercy".
This post is actually quite encouraging. It shows that U.S. military spending is shifting rapidly in the direction of R&D. That's exactly what the military should be spending money on.
If you use the internet, you're benefitting from U.S. military R&D!
I say, if you want to ban CRT, you need to come up with another way of credibly telling minority kids that their society doesn't view them as trash.
CRT seems to me like a medication with a statistically significant effect size and a lot of side effects. But here's the thing...doctors prescribe that kind of medication every day. That's standard practice. If you don't like it, come up with a better medication.