Share this page!

Alexis Baden-Mayer Profile picture
Twitter logo
2 Sep, 113 tweets, 31 min read
Five Questions Only the U.S. Can Answer:

A Response to the Unclassified Summary of the
Intelligence Community Assessment on COVID-19 Origins

1/n
On August 27, 2021, the Intelligence Community (IC) released an unclassified summary of a 90-day Biden administration investigation into the origin of COVID-19.
dni.gov/files/ODNI/doc…

2/n
3/n On whether SARS-CoV-2 was genetically engineered or if it was the result of a laboratory-associated incident, the report was inconclusive, but stated: Image
The summary portrayed the U.S. gov't as unable “to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19” without China’s cooperation, stating the Intelligence Community “judges they will be unable to provide a more definitive explanation for the origin of COVID-19”...
4/n
...without “information on the earliest cases that identified a location of interest or occupational exposure.”
5/n
This is an entirely unsatisfactory and disingenuous statement that fails to acknowledge fact-finding that can and must be completed by the U.S. government.
6/n
A full investigation into U.S.-funded virus hunting, gain-of-function experiments on potential pandemic pathogens, and biological weapons research, is urgently needed.
7/n
The U.S. government must engage in a public fact-finding process to gather and declassify information that it alone possesses regarding the origin of COVID-19.

Here are five questions that only the U.S. can answer.
8/n
1. Did Ralph Baric hide the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and his infamous lab-created virus SHC014-MA15?
9/n
Since the genetic code of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was first published on January 10, 2020, scientists have scoured the coronavirus’s genome for clues to the outbreak’s origins.

The first thing that everyone wanted to know was how similar the new virus was to known viruses.
10/n
What would have been truly damning, destroying any possibility of a natural origin of COVID, is if SARS-CoV-2 had been most similar to SHC014-MA15, the SARS-like coronavirus engineered by Ralph Baric in his infamous gain-of-function experiment. 11/n nature.com/articles/nm.39…
SHC014-MA15 was “a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone.” 12/n gop-foreignaffairs.house.gov/wp-content/upl… Image
We have to take Baric’s word for it that SARS-CoV-2 isn’t strikingly similar to SHC014-MA15, because he didn’t deposit the sequence of SHC014-MA15 in GenBank until May 22, 2020! (And, when he did, he misnamed it SHC015-MA15.) 13/n
nature.com/articles/s4159…
This is worth probing. How reliable is Baric’s claim that the closest known virus to SARS-CoV-2 isn’t SHC014-MA15? Is there any way to check his work? Are there physical samples of SHC014-MA15 that can be reexamined? Are there lab notes contemporaneous with its creation? 14/n
The Baric Lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has the answers to these questions; China’s cooperation is unnecessary. 15/n
So far, the world has accepted at face value the claim of Wuhan Institute of Virology scientist Shi Zhengli that RaTG13 is the closest known relative of SARS-CoV-2. 16/n
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
However, like Baric, Shi has a credibility problem in that her virus didn’t exist prior to 2020 outside of a short sequence published as RaBtCoV/4991 in 2016. 17/n link.springer.com/content/pdf/10…
Shi says that there is no remaining physical sample of RaTG13, so no one can check her work. 18/n
.@nerdhaspower says Shi faked RaTG13. He has published pseudonymously as Shu Kang with Li-Meng Yan, a Hong Kong scientist associated with Steven Bannon and Guo Wengui who believes that SARS-CoV-2 is a Chinese bioweapon. 19/n nerdhaspower.weebly.com/ratg13-is-fake…
RaTG13 has also been given the side-eye by establishment scientists. An analysis by @edwardcholmes and George Gao didn’t even mention RaTG13. 20/n thelancet.com/action/showPdf…
When asked why, Holmes said, “Technically, as it was discovered second, the question should be whether RaTG13 is the same species as 2019-nCoV.” 21/n
Another thing that has complicated the search for the closest known relative of SARS-CoV-2 is that back on September 12, 2019, without explanation, the Wuhan Institute of Virology pulled its virus database offline in the middle of the night. 22/n
However, it is the U.S. military that has the largest collection of viruses in the world. 23/n innovation.defense.gov/Portals/63/doc…
And, documentation of the U.S. collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and U.S. funding of virus hunts in China, makes clear that we have the PREDICT coronavirus collection in the U.S. (Read @BillyBostickson's whole thread.) 24/n
The Biden Administration should conduct its own comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 genome to the coronaviruses in U.S. databases, both natural and lab-made. 25/n
Second of five questions only the U.S. can answer:

Why did U.S. government officials collude to hide evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was genetically engineered?

26/n
Evidence of genetic engineering is written all over SARS-CoV-2.

In January 2020, when scientists examined the genome of SARS-CoV-2, they found a unique feature that made it “100 to 1,000 times” more infectious than the first SARS archive.is/S9aGi
The feature was something that couldn’t have been achieved through natural recombination. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32004758/
In fact, the virus’s genetic code bore a tell-tale sign that it had been engineered in the lab. archive.is/f6iG6 29/n
This was obvious to every scientist who looked at the virus, even those who later published articles claiming the virus wasn’t engineered. usrtk.org/biohazards/sci…
30/n
It should be a top Biden Administration priority to investigate and hold accountable U.S. government officials, including Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, and Robert Kadlec, who colluded to suppress evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was genetically engineered. 31/n
There is no question that they coordinated a cover-up. along with Jeremy Farrar, director of the £29bn Wellcome Trust, to suppress evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was genetically engineered.

What we need to learn is why. 32/n
If you're curious who this British guy is, who seems to be able to boss Fauci, Collins & Kadlec around, read Whitney Webb's masterful exposé on the Wellcome Trust. 33/n
Emails obtained by Buzzfeed News and The Washington Post, revealed that on 01.31.20, Kristian Andersen shared with Fauci the first impressions he and fellow scientists Eddie Holmes, Bob Garry and Mike Worobey had of SARS-CoV-2. 34/n aidsorigins.com/latest-update-…
They thought that “some of the features (potentially) look engineered” and found “the genome inconsistent with expectation from evolutionary theory.”

In a conference call led by Farrar the next day, they were persuaded to change their opinion. 35/n
Publications establishing the natural origin theory of COVID-19 followed. 36/n nature.com/articles/s4159…
On 03.17.20, Kristian Andersen, Eddie Holmes and Bob Garry were among the scientists who published “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2,” in which they stated that their “analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposely manipulated virus.” 37/n
On 07.07.21 Andersen, Holmes, Garry & Worobey in “The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review” stated that “SARS- CoV-2 carries no evidence of genetic markers one might expect from laboratory experiments,” citing their first paper, “Proximal origin.” 38/n sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Emails re: the 02.01.20, call were heavily redacted, so it isn’t clear what changed the scientists’ minds. Emails prior to the last days of January have not been made available, so we don’t have a full record of what led up to the February 1 call. 39/n
It is incumbent on the Biden Administration to complete the record & make it available to the public. Even with a truncated and redacted record, it is obvious that the organizers of the call controlled the financial resources the scientists relied on for their livelihoods. 40/n
In May 2021, Kristian G. Andersen received a new Center for Research in Emerging Infectious Disease (CREID) funded by Fauci’s National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease. 41/n
Were quid pro quos involved? The Biden Administration must investigate. 42/n
A lesser-known aspect of this U.S. government-coordinated cover-up is a January 2020 analysis conducted for the Director of National Intelligence by the Broad Institute, the organization founded and directed by Biden’s Science Secretary Eric Lander. 43/n organicconsumers.org/blog/eric-land…
Broad Institute scientists working on an Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) program known as FELIX (Finding Engineering-Linked Indicators) claim to have compared SARS-CoV-2 to 58 million virus sequences and, after only 10 minutes of analysis... Image
That statement is false. The three bat coronaviruses identified by the FELIX team, BtRs-BetaCoV/YN2018C, BtRl-BetaCoV/SC2018 & SARSr-Rf-BatCoV YNLF_31C, do not provide matches for “all regions of the SARS-CoV-2 genome.” Why would they publish a transparently bogus analysis? 45/n
Much of what IARPA does is classified and funded from a classified budget, so it may be that there is more to the FELIX project than has been revealed to the public.
46/n archive.is/U4ktX#selectio…
The ostensible goal of FELIX was to detect lab-engineered pathogens, but the true purpose of FELIX could be to help scientists get better at what Ralph Baric calls the “no-see-um” technique that keeps detectable fingerprints off lab creations. 47/n raytheonintelligenceandspace.com/news/feature/r…
“If you know how to detect bioengineering, you theoretically understand how to hide your own.” 48/n link.medium.com/jbrVYsZEsib
Was FELIX meant to hide bioengineering rather than reveal it?

Or, did it just have a “junk-in, junk-out” problem? 49/n forbes.com/sites/erictegl…
The FELIX scientists couldn’t figure out how to pin SARS-CoV-2 on the phylogenetic tree.

They weren’t alone, as phylogeneticist John Wenzel complained on the pages of Cladistics. (He had particularly harsh words for the “Proximal origin” scientists.)
What is the reason for these poorly done papers? Were the scientists careless and sloppy?

Or were they trying to do the impossible, wedging a lab-engineered chimera into a phylogenetic tree of naturally occurring viruses? 51/n
This cover-up, intended to bury evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was genetically engineered, happened in the U.S. and only a U.S. investigation can get to the bottom of this. 52/n
Third of five questions only the U.S. can answer:

How did U.S. funding contribute to the origin of COVID-19?
We need a complete audit of all U.S. funding, including from military and classified programs, for coronavirus surveillance, collection, gain-of-function experimentation, countermeasures development and pandemic preparedness. 54/n docs.google.com/document/d/1b8…
Congressman McCaul’s August 2021 report, “The Origins of COVID-19: An Investigation of the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” lists U.S. government grants that supported the virus hunting and gain-of-function experiments necessary to produce SARS-CoV-2. 55/n gop-foreignaffairs.house.gov/wp-content/upl…
One of these is the United States Agency for International Development’s Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT virus-hunting program. 56/n usaid.gov/sites/default/…
It was on PREDICT virus hunts in Yunnan, China, that Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance and Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology found RsSHC014, the virus they gave to Ralph Baric for his infamous gain-of-function experiment. 57/n healthmap.org/predict/
Shi & Daszak announced their discovery of RsSHC014 in 2013, stating it was found during “a 12-month longitudinal survey (April 2011–September 2012) of SL-CoVs in a colony of Rhinolophus sinicus at a single location in Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.” 58/n nature.com/articles/natur…
Not long after (August and September 2012 and April and July 2013), Shi and Daszak discovered the closest known relative to SARS-CoV-2, now known as RaTG13. They published a short sequence of it as RaBtCoV/4991 in 2016. 59/n
It was also during PREDICT virus hunts that 6 men exposed to bat guano ended up in a Kunming hospital with severe pneumonia of an unknown cause. Admitted to the hospital in April, 2012. Three died. The longest hospitalization lasted into September 2012.
Wuhan Institute of Virology collected samples from the men in the hospital. Curiously, according to the Genome Sequence Archive, RaTG13 was “was extracted from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid,” which suggests that the virus was taken from a sick person. 61/n bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA…
Elsewhere RaTG13 is identified as an RNA sequence taken from a bat fecal swab. 62/n
Strangely, none of the PREDICT scientists published anything related to the deadly outbreak, even though spillover events like this were their raison d'etre.

What is the significance of the 2012 Kunming SARS-like outbreak and its relationship to the origins of SARS-CoV-2?

63/n
Is it a comedy of errors where scientists, who tell funders they can predict the next pandemic, are so inept that they accidentally cause it, making prophets of the lab safety advocates?

64/n
Or, has the origin of COVID-19 been grafted on to this spillover event to give an intentionally released genetically engineered virus the semblance of a natural origin? 65/n
Pre-COVID-19, the story had belonged to a group of Chinese researchers not associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology or the PREDICT virus hunts, who discovered a new virus they called the Mojiang paramyxovirus (MojV).
66/n science.org/content/articl…
Complicating things even more is that the viruses collected in Yunnan didn’t stay in Yunnan. We assume most ended up in Wuhan, 1500 km away, where the COVID-19 pandemic began. At least 1 went to the Baric Lab, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Where else did they go?
Did any of the viruses end up with Metabiota?

Metabiota was on the PREDICT virus hunt with the Wuhan Institute of Virology & EcoHealth Alliance. The three organizations published an analysis of bat viruses collected in Yunnan, Nov 2011-March 2012. 68/n
Metabiota is a for-profit company funded by Google Ventures that is a notorious Pentagon biological weapons contractor. 69/n
Is this why Google’s Eric Schmidt is so interested in suppressing the origin of COVID-19? 70/n organicconsumers.org/blog/googles-e…
Eric Schmidt’s foundation is funding the Philip Zelikow-led COVID Commission Planning Group.
Jeffrey Skoll’s foundation is chipping in on the cover-up. Like Google, it also funded Metabiota. 72/n venturebeat.com/2014/03/20/met…
The Rockefeller Foundation is underwriting the Zelikow snow job, too; it’s directed by Rajiv Shah, who was President Obama’s USAID director during the PREDICT virus hunts. 73/n reliefweb.int/sites/reliefwe…
A little-known fact is that Eric Schmidt launched Predict and Prevent at Googleorg in 2008 with donations from Google and Skoll to the Global Viral Forecasting Initiative, the non-profit precursor to Metabiota. 74/n google.org/Predict_Preven…
Another Metabiota investor was Hunter Biden, through Rosemont Seneca Partners.
Schmidt launched Predict & Prevent at GoogleOrg in 2008 w/ donations from Google & Skoll to Global Viral, Metabiota's non-profit, then found a home—& hundreds of millions of dollars—for it at USAID in 2009. That’s how USAID PREDICT got started. 76/n google.org/Predict_Preven…
Metabiota is a sketchy defense contractor that’s taken at least $59.8 million from the federal treasury. 77/n usaspending.gov/keyword_search…
EcoHealth Alliance, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Baric Lab also have ties to the U.S. military.

EcoHealth Alliance has an unexpected advisor for a public health non-profit: David R. Franz, former USAMRIID commander. 78/n organicconsumers.org/blog/david-r-f…
Upon retiring from the military in 1998, Franz received contracts for three years, between 1999 and 2001, from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), to produce weaponized anthrax. 79/n bizjournals.com/washington/sto…
David Franz worked on the pre-9/11 DARPA weaponized anthrax project with Ken Alibek & Charles Bailey, a former Russian biological weapons scientist and a fellow former Fort Detrick commander. 80/n
Alibek and Bailey’s firm Advanced Biosystems was the prime contractor for the DARPA project, while Franz’s Southern Research Institute was a subcontractor. Bailey and Alibek filed a patent on the silicon microencapsulation technology in 2001.
81/n patents.google.com/patent/US66494…
In their 2012 article, Martin E. Hugh-Jones, Barbara Hatch Rosenberg & Stuart Jacobsen linked the forensic evidence from the 2001 attack anthrax to the silicon coated anthrax developed by Franz, Alibek & Bailey for DARPA. omicsonline.org/evidence-for-t…
It is likely David Franz who helped EcoHealth Alliance become such a successful military contractor. organicconsumers.org/blog/peter-sho… 83/n
Shi Zhengli & her colleagues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology have also collaborated directly with U.S. military scientists and participated in Pentagon funded research. 84/n organicconsumers.org/blog/shi-zheng…
Ralph Baric has also worked very closely with U.S. military scientists. @monkeyking67's Fauci Dossier revealed Baric & USAMRIID's Kristopher M. Curtis filed a patent together, “Methods for producing recombinant coronavirus,” in 2001―prior to SARS. 85/n f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/…
Baric has published many articles with USAMRIID scientists, including Peter Jahrling who oversaw the BSL-4 labs at Fort Detrick as director of the Integrated Research Facility.

There's a great quote from Baric in this 2015 Jahrling profile... 86/n
Beginning in 2012, Baric received funding from the Pentagon through the Defense Threat Reduction Agency to develop a “Lung-on-a-Chip” to simulate human lungs in the lab. 87/n rti.org/news/rti-inter…
It would be nice to think that Baric was ignorant of the biological weapons potential of his gain-of-function research, but he’s written extensively on the subject, in what could only be described as a how-to-manual for bioweapons enthusiasts. 88/n
#4 of 5 Questions Only the U.S. Can Answer:

What can U.S. doctors in Wuhan in 2019 tell us about the first cases?
China should identify Wuhan’s patient zero and explain how they got infected. 90/n
…but the U.S. has data on early cases, too.

There were prominent U.S. doctors and scientists who gathered data on the 2019 outbreak in Wuhan, including Michael Callahan and Ian Lipkin.
Any look at Michael Callahan begins with @hijodelcuervo's DARPA's Man in Wuhan. 92/n
93/n A thread on a few things to add to @hijodelcuervo's DARPA's Man in Wuhan, beginning with Michael Callahan's work for Emergent Biosolutions & Robert Kadlec...
94/n Lipkin & his joint U.S-Chinese research team was able to “access nationwide blood bank samples taken from pneumonia patients so the group could study whether coronavirus had been present in the population before it was detected in Wuhan.”
95/n Lipkin says he was alerted to the outbreak in Wuhan on December 15, 2019. It wasn't reported to the World Health Organization until December 30.
Yes, this is a BFD. Read @zeynep's whole thread on why. 96/n
Besides Michael Callahan & Ian Lipkin, were there any other U.S. scientists who knew about COVID before anyone else & therefore may have information about index cases/patient zero?

Philip Coelho of ThermoGenesis Corp. says he was alerted in November! 97/n
In November 2019, was inside information about the plandemic given to corporations like ThermoGenesis so they could profit?

That's when Israeli sources say U.S. intelligence agencies gave a heads-up to NATO & IDF.
Another potentially rich source of data on early cases are U.S. participants in the World Military Games. The Biden Administration should investigate this possible super-spreader event, as House Republicans have demanded. 99/n
There are notable failures regarding the testing of quarantined U.S. citizens returning from abroad in early 2020 (according to Michael Callahan who participated in these events). These should be reviewed. 100/n
There is data in blood samples collected through NIH’s “All of Us” survey & nasal swabs from the Pentagon’s Respiratory Surveillance Program. So far, analysis of samples from early 2020 show SARS-CoV-2 may have circulated in the U.S. as early as Dec 2019.
#5 of 5 Questions About the #OriginofCOVID19 that Only the Can the U.S. Can Answer:

Can the U.S. rebut Chinese accusations that SARS-CoV-2 came from Fort Detrick?

102/n
Chinese accusations that SARS-CoV-2 originated in the U.S. biological weapons labs at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland, are disingenuous. 103/n
If China wants to prove that SARS-CoV-2 was brought to Wuhan by U.S. participants in the World Military Games, they should produce evidence on the earliest cases that demonstrates a connection between the Games and patient zero.
Instead, China has actually hidden data on cases prior to the December 2019 cluster that they unsuccessfully tied to the seafood market. 105/n
Nevertheless, it is important to examine the real evidence that something was amiss at Fort Detrick in 2019. 106/n
Given that both the U.S. and China are playing a blame game that isn’t getting us any closer to the truth, we can’t rule out the possibility that conspirators in both countries colluded in an intentional release that would look like a lab accident. 107/n
Knowing what happened with the anthrax attacks in 2001—the official story was a Fort Detrick scientist did it—anything’s possible.

(Hassell, now in on COVID origins cover-up, was the FBI Laboratory Director when Bruce Ivins was suicided & scapegoated.) organicconsumers.org/blog/christian…
Documents on the 2019 Fort Detrick shutdown obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests have been redacted to remove information on the pathogens involved in breaches of containment. Were SARS-like viruses involved? fredericknewspost.com/news/politics_…
Why did the Defense Department withhold $104 million from the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases and the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense in 2019?
110/n fredericknewspost.com/news/politics_…
A full investigation of the 2019 Fort Detrick shutdown could provide clues to the origin COVID-19, but full transparency is required regardless. 111/n
Each of these five questions is necessary to understanding the origin of COVID-19 and can only be answered by the U.S.

112/n
As a first step, the U.S. government should declassify and make public all of the information reviewed during the 90-day Intelligence Community investigation.
113/n

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Alexis Baden-Mayer

Alexis Baden-Mayer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexisBadenMaye

Alexis Baden-Mayer Profile picture
27 Aug
The Gain-of-Function Hall of Shame series chronicles the biological weapons industrial complex, the bureaucrats who fund it, the corporations that shape it and the existential risk that genetic engineering and synthetic biology pose to us all.
organicconsumers.org/news/gain-of-f…
.@OrganicConsumer began this series in search of the #originofCOVID19, something @ronnie_cummins & @mercola covered in their best-selling book, The Truth About COVID-19: Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal. amazon.com/Truth-About-CO…
We hope that reading this series will inspire you to join the movement to ban gain-of-function research on potential pandemic pathogens, along with emerging biotechnologies like gene editing that could also be used as biological weapons.
advocacy.organicconsumers.org/page/18957/pet…
Read 68 tweets
Alexis Baden-Mayer Profile picture
21 Aug
Just finished up a long thread "Eric Lander: How Biden’s Science Secretary Aided the COVID Origins Cover-Up… and Why".

This thread is a shorter summary with my thoughts...
Evidence of genetic engineering is written all over the SARS-CoV-2’s genome.

Still, that doesn’t tell us whodunnit.

While Americans have pointed to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Chinese have leveled accusations against Ft. Detrick. globaltimes.cn/page/202108/12…
Neither country seems interested in identifying Patient Zero to figure out how that person was infected and, consequently, how the virus was released.

Is this a joint “Chimerica” plot to cover-up the origins of a chimeric virus?

(Stole that language from @riannuzziGPC.)
Read 20 tweets
Alexis Baden-Mayer Profile picture
18 Aug
Eric Lander: How Biden’s Science Secretary Aided the COVID Origins Cover-Up… and Why

...soon to be posted as a new entry in the Gain-of-Function Hall of Shame organicconsumers.org/news/gain-of-f…
Eric Lander is a scientist and biotech entrepreneur who currently serves in President Biden’s Cabinet as his Science Advisor and the Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.
Eric Lander is the founding director of the Broad Institute, a genetic engineering and synthetic biology outfit launched by the late Eli Broad, a billionaire philanthrocapitalist who seeded a modern-day eugenics movement based on genetic distinctions and determinism.
Read 158 tweets
Alexis Baden-Mayer Profile picture
24 Apr
truth.organicconsumers.org
Dr. Joseph Mercola & Ronnie Cummins, authors of bestselling book The Truth About COVID-19: Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal amazon.com/Truth-about-Co…
Dr. Dolores Cahill, World Freedom Alliance & World Doctors Alliance worlddoctorsalliance.com
Read 15 tweets
Alexis Baden-Mayer Profile picture
22 Apr
If our so-called “public health” authorities were serious about their mission, we’d all be eating clean, nutrient dense organic food. Instead, they serve the chemical & pharmaceutical companies, letting them poison us, drug us and rob us of our health. organicconsumers.org/news/on-public…
When we try to get away from that, they go after the alternatives we’ve created.

USDA Organic doesn’t require food to be grown in soil anymore and it isn’t doing anything about organic cheaters keeping animals in factory farms.
Meanwhile, some of the healthiest and most regenerative organic foods, and the best natural cures, have been criminalized, like raw milk and cannabis.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @AlexisBadenMaye has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @AlexisBadenMaye!

Read all threads by @AlexisBadenMaye

:(