New in print with @natalatl: Domestication, crop breeding, and genetic modification are fundamentally different processes. Calling #GMOs just another kind of plant modification, ignores the most critical break - the sociopolitical uses of the technology
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Yes, domestication, institutional breeding, and biotech all involve genetic and phenotypic changes, but while domestication is a diffuse coevolutionary process, commercial breeding and biotech have focused overwhelmingly on crops and traits that return capital #capitalocene
Crop breeding institutions in the 20th century made it possible to alienate farmers from new plant varieties, a process legally and materially intensified by commercial biotechnology. Globally, currently planted traits are overwhelmingly pest/herbicide resistant commodity crops
Over the past century, crop breeding and GM became the dominant process by which crops evolve, causing social and biological bottlenecks that reduce agrobiodiversity and restrict its movements and ownership.
On-farm crop improvement involves significant input and ownership by women and Indigenous people, yet female scientists are less than 1/4 of faculty/leadership at land grants; Fulltime Black, Latinx, and Native American faculty are just over 10% equityinhighered.org/resources/idea…
This imbalance contributes to ongoing mistrust between local knowledge holders and the scientific community. Replacing 10k years of domestication with crop breeding and GM reduced on-farm agrobiodiversity and capacity to respond to dynamic environmental or economic disruptions
By claiming that GM is not fundamentally different from domestication, proponents in scholarly and popular literature undermine grassroots attempts to conserve agrobiodiversity and bolster seed and food sovereignty

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Flachs

Andrew Flachs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrFlachsophone

21 Jul
Moments of clarity looking at the big picture as to what kinds of issues GMOs might solve and why they are not doing so, but misrepresents key agrarian and genetic context in search of a simple technological fix. To name just a few:

nytimes.com/2021/07/20/mag…
On genetics: "the plant contained a pair of genes from a snapdragon" This misrepresent what GM is and does. Genes identified in a snapdragon helped to produce anthocyanin, scientists successfully inserted the same sequence into the plant, and it performed similarly
On opposition by the wealthy/organic lobby: While marketers exploit a fear of consumption, there is notable caution from key African markets as @MatthewSchnurr and @joevarock and many others show anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11… link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(