Matter of fact, I wrote about it once. vox.com/policy-and-pol…
I'm vigorously procrastinating exercise, so a short thread on this.

One of the great privileges of being part of a hegemonic group is that you're the standard model, the baseline -- just a Person rather than a [Modifier] Person. In this case, just a man rather than a white man.
This allows you individuality. In effect, you get to choose your identity, choose your modifiers, as you see fit. You're only a part of groups you choose; you only carry your own baggage, not collective baggage. You get to be unique, self-made, bespoke, not part of some lump.
When you enter a culture as a non-standard model, a [Modifier] Person, you carry all the collective baggage of that modifier. You are met with an array of assumptions, boxed & categorized, before you say or do anything. You aren't a blank slate; you carry a whole history.
This is why white men don't like to be called, or thought of, as "white men." It gives them a modifier, and with it, a bunch of baggage. It carries with it some history & a bunch of assumptions about how they think, what they believe, what they'll do, etc.
To people socialized to think of themselves as protean self-creators, unique free thinkers, it can be maddening & offensive to be lumped in with a group & subject to such assumptions. How dare you! #Notallwhitepeople!
Also, one aspect of recognizing that you're part of a group with a particular history & particular habits of thought is recognizing that there may be assumptions & biases affecting your thinking that *you aren't even aware of*, so thoroughly are you socialized in the group.
It's hard to overstate how much white dudes hate this idea -- that they came to their theories & worldviews not solely through the rigorous application of Reason, but because of where & when they are embedded in history, shaped by forces they do not control or fully understand.
"You just think what you think & say what you say because you're a white guy in 21st century" -- this is absolutely maddening to white guys. It feels like a loss of autonomy & control, a loss of self-ownership, a violation of their deepest self-definition.
Of course -- this is so obvious I don't even know if it counts as irony -- this is precisely how white men have treated [Modifier] Americans for all of US history, precisely what subaltern groups have struggled so hard to escape. It's how white guys *still* treat Others.
Anyway, I think this helps explain a lot of the anger at woke culture among white dudes purportedly on the left. There is no group on earth more in love with their own precious, unique, bespoke ideas & theories. They are not lemmings, they Reason!
All humans are prone to "fundamental attribution error" -- inclined to see other as products of their backgrounds & ourselves as individuals. Part of good intellectual & social practice, I think, is trying, to the extent possible, to reverse that. In other words ...
... a) try to take others more as individuals & less as the sum of their modifiers, while also b) becoming more aware & sensitive to the fact that you, like everyone, ARE part of particular social groups & ARE shaped by them & DO have habits & prejudices you're not aware of.
The only thing to do with that knowledge is be humble -- open to the possibility that you're wrong or that your conclusions have been shaped by the socialization your group receives. It means never being totally confident, living with uncertainty, giving up some sense of control.
For instance, if you're a white dude & someone tells you that your reactions to a female politician are shaped by culture's ubiquitous misogyny, maybe don't go straight to, "fuck you I know my own thoughts & intentions & you don't & I came to these reactions via Reason!"
Maybe just, like, take a moment. Sit with the possibility. Think about how you respond to male politicians. Do a little self-reflection; entertain the idea that some patterns in your thought & behavior might be discernible from the outside in a way they aren't from inside.
It doesn't mean either you have your opinions "because you're a minsogynst" or ... not. It's not a binary. It just means people are shaped by history & context in ways they're not always consciously aware of. Your range of individual motion is not nothing, but also not unbounded.
For white men, socialized to believe they're only Men to the extent they ARE in control, trained to view doubt & uncertainty as weakness, this is quite difficult. It's difficult for anybody! But it's just what other groups have had to deal with forever; welcome to life.
All right, I can only imagine the nightmarish responses this thread is eliciting, even as we speak, which gives me the motivation I need to get the F offline & go exercise. Mission accomplished!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvolts

15 Sep
Just took a short break from the depressing hellscape of national politics to talk with some Illinois folk about the amazing energy bill the state just passed.

Competent, forward-looking public policy is possible ... where, and only where, voters elect Dem supermajorities.
The process in Illinois is what you want from democracy: utilities, renewable energy developers, unions, EJ advocates, & greens got in a room together & hashed it out. It was long & painful & contentious. It took *3 years*. Everyone got stuff; everyone gave stuff up. But ...
...in the end, everyone got a bill they can live with & the state got a huge leap forward, for its economy, its health, & its most vulnerable.

But that whole process was only possible because Ds ran everything. They allowed small-d democracy to happen, interests to be balanced.
Read 7 tweets
14 Sep
Every time AOC does anything, the entire right descends into intensely cringey hysterics. She taps directly into their every neurosis & hangup & they are helpless to hide it. It is embarrassing to watch, in a fremdschämen sort of way.
One enduring aspect of reactionary conservatism is that it's populated by people obsessed with those they perceive as the cool, popular kids. They always felt outside that circle, never get over it, & are gripped by alternating resentment & envy.
As in all things, Trump is the ultimate example. His entire life is built around his envy of the Manhattan inner circle that he could never seem to get inside, no matter how much money he accumulated. He "hates" the New York Times the way Magats "hate" AOC ...
Read 9 tweets
12 Sep
My birthday cake: chocolate-zucchini-rosemary, with pecans, covered in tart lemon drizzle. 🎂
Thank you for your kind bday wishes. How am I doing on my birthday? Shitty! In the personal sphere, my aging body is falling apart, my naturally antisocial tendencies are making me into a hermit, & my beloved sons will be leaving the house soon, about which I am hopelessly sad.
In the public sphere, US democracy is descending into authoritarian shit & climate change is barely being restrained. All signs point to my kids inheriting a world that will grow ever meaner, nastier, & more inequitable.
Read 7 tweets
11 Sep
3,200 on Thursday. 2,400 yesterday. On average, Covid is killing around as many Americans as died on 9/11 every single day.
The very same people who were willing to send American children to war, spend trillions of dollars nation-building, commit war crimes, torture prisoners, & build a massive domestic-surveillance regime in response to 9/11 ... are unwilling to wear masks to stop a daily 9/11.
What's uncomfortable to talk about is that, especially for the loudest post-9/11 voices, it wasn't really about the lives lost. It was about ego injury, about being hurt by a group of brown people we'd been socialized to think of as primitive & weak.
Read 6 tweets
8 Sep
I know it's nobody's fault & probably couldn't have happened otherwise, but there are some real drawbacks to the fact that climate change entered the public consciousness via the hard sciences & has always been draped in scientism & festooned with scientific jargon.
Just want to say for the record that I did NOT pay this guy to come along & illustrate my point so perfectly.
Read 7 tweets
8 Sep
Fuck this. Progressives should make clear they won't vote for the BIF if this is all that's on the table. axios.com/scoop-manchin-…
Also, I know I keep ranting about this, but it's all so fucking arbitrary. WHY $1.5T rather than $3.5T? What reasoning or economic analysis supports this? Manchin just pulls these numbers out of the shallow puddle of his mind & is allowed to masquerade as "responsible." Uuuugh.
Here's an idea: let's stop talking about the headline spending number of the reconciliation bill & start talking about what it does. Manchin's dickheadery should not be framed as "spending less," but as "cutting back needed support for working parents & the elderly."
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(