#FridayPhysicsFun – I am back home in the apartment where I grew up on the 11th floor. That is about 30 m down to the street, and as a kid I often considered the fate of toys dropped from the balcony. How does falling really work? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagalund
The schoolbook answer is that the gravitational force F=mg accelerates the object as per Newton’s second law of motion F=ma and the falling object has an acceleration a=g because the mass factor cancels from both equations.
The velocity becomes v(t)=gt at time t, and the distance travelled d(t)=(1/2)gt^2. I remember kid-me inverting the later formula to t=sqrt(2h/g) and checking by dropping marbles that they took about 2.47 s to hit the ground. Fortunately nobody got hurt.
This ignores air resistance, which gives a velocity dependent force proportional to the square velocity, the air density rho, the area A, and a complicated drag coefficient C. Adding it to the equation makes things complicated (kid-me was annoyed!) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(phy…
The basic effect is that velocity doesn’t keep on increasing but reaches terminal velocity sqrt(2mg/rho A C). A parachute boosts A and C, while a heavy object will fall faster in air (despite Galileo!)
A nice rule of thumb is that objects with density close to water (like humans and rain) have terminal velocity 90 m/s times sqrt(size in metres). For humans this is 70 m/s, insects and rain about 9 m/s or less.
Really small objects have viscosity-dominated drag and slow more since the drag is proportional to velocity and not the squared velocity, which matters more at low velocity. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes%27…
Assuming constant gravity is wrong. Up here the gravitational acceleration is about 9.4 millionths weaker than at the ground since I am closer to space.
Inside Earth gravity declines as one approaches the core. A classic physics problem is to calculate the time it would take to fall through a hole straight through Earth. (It also shows up in Gregory Benford’s SF novel “Tides of Light”) hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Mechanic…
Assuming Earth has constant density is not a good approximation. Gravity is roughly constant in the mantle, increasing slightly as the core is approached and then declines. This produces a slightly different and messier answer. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Eart…
aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.…
There is also a centrifugal acceleration that is 1.7 thousands of the gravitational. Since I am about at 60 degrees north this is pointed 30 degrees upwards, in a southern direction. Were the Earth spinning really fast falling would be more up/out than down.
Talking about “centrifugal force” usually invites arguments about whether it is a “fictitious force” we see because we use a rotating reference frame or whether this is needless pedantry.
xkcd.com/123/
One important aspect is that the acceleration is independent of the mass of a body: heavy & light things are equally accelerated. Sounds much like gravity but there it only happens because the inertial mass and gravitational mass are exactly the same. einstein-online.info/en/spotlight/i…
My physics teacher solemnly said this was a great mystery. However, Einstein resolved it some decades before by the equivalence principle: if gravity is the same as what you feel in an accelerated frame of reference, then they automatically become equal. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalen…
Falling in general relativity means following a geodesic (shortest path) through spacetime. My dropped marble curves along a path 30 m tall and 2.47 s long (about 734,000 km) in the curved spacetime near Earth. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzsc…
numdam.org/article/AIHPA_…
It is somewhat non-intuitive and hard to visualize. I like Alessandro Roussel's brave attempt at visualizing it better. Not sure that it succeeds, but it is worth a try.
Another general relativity effect is that time flows a bit faster up here than down on the street. This is a factor of 3.33*10^-15. Over my lifetime so far this difference amounts to about 5 microseconds.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anders Sandberg

Anders Sandberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @anderssandberg

3 Sep
Yet another rediscovery that simplified abstractions of neurons are simpler than the real thing! quantamagazine.org/how-computatio… To be fair, Beniaguev, Segev & London have a neat way of quantifying it using a kind of circuit complexity: doi.org/10.1016/j.neur…
IMHO the coolest result is that the NMDA receptors contribute a lot of the complexity in biological neurons: leave them out, and things simplify a lot. They are well placed to change properties deeply based on experience.
On the other hand, the fact that even ReLU-sum-of-weighted-input artificial neurons are not just computationally universal but actually work really well for real applications hint that maybe complex neurons are overrated.
Read 4 tweets
21 Aug
VQGAN+CLIP: "Moominvalley by Tove Jansson" (+trending on ArtStation)
+"rendered in Maya", +"Line art"
+"Tom of Finland" (the ultimate Finnish LGBTQ collaboration?) I really love the trees in the background.
Read 7 tweets
20 Aug
#FridayPhysicsFun – Normal crystals consist of atoms or molecules arranged in a regular lattice. Recently there has been experimental demonstrations of 2D Wigner crystals – crystals made of just electrons.
quantamagazine.org/physicists-cre…
The idea is pretty old: Eugene Wigner proposed in 1934 that electrons would repel each other and if the density was low enough form a lattice. The repulsion dominates over the kinetic energy and makes it “solid”.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_cr…
Too high density and they “quantum melt” as the kinetic energy dominates and the lattice dissolves. Too high temperature and they melt normally because of thermal vibration. 3D Wigner crystals need a lower density than 2D crystals to solidify.
Read 12 tweets
6 Aug
This paper from @CSERCambridge is a great example of systems thinking in GCRs: looking for pinch points where global infrastructure concentrates near natural hazards. nature.com/articles/s4146…
Many things get drawn close to hazards: Teheran is on a fault line that provides good water, container ports on cheap flat land close to the sea vulnerable to storm surge and sea rise, people live in Florida because weather that also enables hurricanes.
Good geothermal and cooling are drawing data centers to Iceland. The Mediterranean and Bay Area complex geology make them attractive but geologically "exciting". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsili
Read 11 tweets
4 Aug
"You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door. There is a small mailbox here." (VQGAN+CLIP seems somewhat obsessed with the mailbox.) ImageImageImageImage
"You are behind the white house. A path leads into the forest to the east. In one corner of the house there is a small window which is slightly ajar." Image
"You are in the living room. There is a doorway to the east, a wooden door with strange gothic lettering to the west, which appears to be nailed shut, a trophy case, and a large oriental rug in the center of the room. Above the trophy case hangs an elvish sword of great anti..." Image
Read 7 tweets
3 Aug
If the Hampshire et al. thelancet.com/journals/eclin… findings of cognitive deficits in people with long covid hold up they seem to be a strong reason to promote development of cognitive enhancer methods.
Were one to equate the deficits to IQ points and assume a population like this cohort (dodgy, of course) this corresponds to a mean decline of 0.1 IQ points across the population (~0.6 for covid cases). Smaller than typical childhood lead exposure numbers, but still...
While hopefully there is some neat single cause of the cognitive deficits that could be fixed directly, it looks to me more like a melange of bad stuff. Which really suggests a need for general purpose cognitive, energy and neuro-repair enhancers.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(