I like to think investment topics that on surface seem mundane but with deeper thought, are more complex than meets the eye.
One of such topics is INSURANCE FLOAT. This thread covers the basics of float and how to think about valuing it.
Best enjoyed with a cup of tea 🫖
2/🧵
Let’s start with the basics.
If you’ve bought an insurance, you’ve paid an upfront fee called the “premium”. It is uncertain whether you will get anything back in form of “claims” over time, but the upfront fee must be paid, nevertheless.
3/🧵
Insurance company holds the capital for the time between collecting premiums and paying out claims. This pool of funds is called the “float”.
In other words, float is money being held and invested by the insurance company but not owned by it.
For the accounting fans out there, here’s the “scientific definition” used by Berkshire Hathaway.
Luckily, some insurance companies do disclose the aggregate numbers on a silver platter so you may put down your calculators.
5/🧵
With regards to float, there are three critical considerations:
i) the cost of float
ii) the growth of float
iii) investment returns with float
Let’s look at each one.
6/🧵
i) the cost of float
Float doesn’t come without commitments – there are future claims to be paid.
If insurer has underpriced risks, it suffers “underwriting losses” as claims exceed premiums over time. On the contrary, well-run insurers benefit from “underwriting profits”.
7/🧵
i) the cost of float
If insurance company is consistently posting underwriting profits, it is effectively BEING PAID to hold float, i.e. borrowing money at a negative interest rate.
Underwriting losses equal a cost (an interest paid) for the float.
8/🧵
i) the cost of float
Take $BRK Berkshire Hathaway. Its stellar insurance operations have meant that most of the time it has held substantial float at an interest less than that of Treasuries.
We’ve now concluded that float can have either positive or negative cost, depending on the quality of the underlying insurance operations.
As float is the result of a “living organism” of a company, it can also grow over the years once it’s bought.
11/🧵
ii) the growth of float
Take again Berkshire Hathaway that started its insurance operations in 1967 by acquiring National Indemnity. More details of the deal in the following tweet.
While insurer holds float on behalf of customers, it can be invested for an excess return.
How that money can be invested is regulated (see NAIC guidelines content.naic.org/sites/default/…) but there's still big differences between companies.
18/🧵
iii) investment returns with float
Most insurers must invest conservatively mainly to fixed asset classes.
E.g., Progressive $PGR had in 2020 a total of $42 billion (88%) in fixed or short-term securities, but only $5.5 billion (12%) in equities.
Thanks to its unique combination of insurance and unrelated operations, $BRK can invest meaningfully more in equities ($298 bln, or 66%) compared to low-risk assets ($155 bln, or 34%).
To summarize, returns should exceed risk-free returns (30-year Treasuries) but be limited by long-term equity returns.
Float is only attractive if it can be obtained at low cost, i.e. returns exceed the cost of float.
23/🧵
How about valuing float?
As float is other people’s money, it is accounted for as liability in the balance sheet. By now, however, we’ve learnt that it has very equity-like characteristics.
24/🧵
Holding $100 mln to invest for your own good, collecting returns as you go at no cost, should obviously be worth $100 mln for you.
So, constant, zero-cost float can be argued to be valued at least dollar to dollar.
25/🧵
In such a case, if company’s book value is of any worth and it’s a world-class insurer, a simple addition of equity and float should provide a helpful guideline.
It certainly seems so by looking at Progressive $PGR and Berkshire Hathaway $BRK.
26/🧵
What if we change the assumptions?
Here is sensitivity analysis with the following ranges and assumptions, mid-point being baseline:
- Discount rate 1 - 7%
- Investment premium (-2) - 6%
- Float growth (-10) - 10%
- Cost of float (-5) - 5%
- 15 years (no perpetuity)
27/🧵
In a nutshell, the net present value of float is calculated through the earnings stream it allows for its holder.
Below few additional golden nuggets of wisdom regarding float.
I’m not an insurance expert but consider that an advantage; had to oversimplify things for myself, hence hopefully been able to clarify it to you too.
For true insurance expertise, follow @SauliVilen 🇫🇮 if you’re a Finn and @ChrisBloomstran 🇺🇸 if you’re a curious human.
32/🧵
You’ve made it this far, so you seem to like threads. Me too.
Once I’ve got your attention, I’d appreciate your input on the best time to post threads like this in the future:
33/🧵
This was thread of insurance float – thanks for sticking with me!
If you enjoyed this, there'll be more so make sure to follow @hkeskiva. All my previous, similar threads can be found below if you still have some tea left.
I’ve known Aswath Damodaran is great, but this may well be the most entertaining investment lecture there is.
The whole 45min lecture on the WORST VALUATION MISTAKES AND HOW TO AVOID THEM is worth watching but summarizing best bits in this thread.
🫖
2/🧵
“It takes me 45 mins to get into any topic, so I thought I'd pick something very specific. I thought I'd talk about deferred taxes for 45 mins.
If you think I'm serious, you're sick.”
3/🧵
“Most people who claim to do valuation are not doing valuation. They're doing pricing.
Pick up an equity research report. What do you see? You see a company. You see a multiple. You see comparables. So much of what passes for valuation out there is pricing.”
Viime kerralla kävimme läpi yhtä kassavirtaan keskittyvää lempitunnuslukuani (OCF/CAPEX).
Ketjun jälkeen mieleen juolahti, että lähestymistapaa voi entisestäänkin parantaa. Se kohtelee nimittäin kasvuyhtiöitä epäreilusti. Katsotaan kansantajuisesti, mistä on kyse.
🫖
2/🧵
Edellinen ketjuni käsitteli siis yrityksen kassavirtaprofiilia ja sitä, kuinka se jakautuu liiketoiminnan ja investointien rahavirtaan.
Mikäli ketju on lukematta niin kannattaa ehdottomasti aloittaa siitä.
Sovelletaan edellisen ketjun esimerkkiä vuoteen 1982. Katsotaan nykyään uskomattoman hyvin menestyneen, mutta tuolloin vasta listautuneen The Home Depot’n lukuja.
Yhtiö oli tuolloin vahvassa yli 70% vuosikasvuvauhdissa ja uusia liikkeitä syntyi liukuhihnalta.
Sijoittaja tarvitsee tietoa. Ammattilaissijoittajien suosima Bloomberg-terminaali saattaa maksaa kuitenkin yli 20 000 euroa vuodessa, mikä tekee siitä aivan liian kalliin useimmille.
Siksi kerään tähän ketjuun kaikille ilmaisia tietolähteitä, joita käytän itsekin.
🫖
2/🧵
Nostetaan ensimmäisenä kotimarkkinoiden @inderes ja heidän kotisivuilta löytyvät yhtiötiedot erityisesti suomalaisista yhtiöistä.
Tuloslaskelmat, kannattavuusluvut, arvostuskertoimet ja paljon muuta. Ohessa tiedot esimerkkinä Nesteelle. inderes.fi/companies/Neste
3/🧵
@KoyfinCharts on yksi parhaista kansainvälisistä, ilmaisista yritystietopalveluista. Helppokäyttöinen ja laaja palvelu sisältää keskeisiä tietoja myös pohjoismaisista yrityksistä, kuten suomalaisesta @valmetir, jonka tuloslaskelman lukuja ohessa.
Katsotaan tällä kertaa tarkemmin yhtä mieluisimmistani tunnusluvuista, johon en ole törmännyt juurikaan muualla.
Käydään tässä ketjussa läpi, miksi kassavirtojen suhteella on sijoittajalle väliä ja miten se liittyy maailman parhaisiin yhtiöihin.
🫖
2/🧵
Heti kättelyssä tärkeä selventää, että mikään yksittäinen tunnusluku ei kerro sijoituskohteen hyvyyttä tai huonoutta.
Samoin harjoitus on yksinkertaistus ja yksityiskohdilla voi halutessaan kikkailla mielin määrin. Pysyttelemme nyt kuitenkin mahdollisimman helpossa.
3/🧵
Ajatellaan kaksi yhtiötä, joilla molemmilla on sama 100 MEUR vapaa kassavirta. Molemmat yhtiöt arvotetaan viisitoistakertaisesti vapaan kassavirran verran eli molempien hinta 1 500 MEUR.
- Fed is going to reimpose its power, rates are going to go down, everything is going to go back to the way it was
- mean reversion to the last 10 years"