Genetics certainly plays a role in who you are as an individual. What that means in the society you live in is completely dependent on the way people choose to structure that society.
In other words, your individual genetics don't *cause* your social outcomes. The society you live in and how it's structured does.
We can take a Polygenic Risk Score that predicts being a teacher even with high accuracy and restructure society such that those with the highest scores never become teachers.

Acknowledge genes, but let's not get carried away with claims about genetic causality.
We should also note these techniques always make assumptions about the environment. One of which is that my previous example wouldn't hold because the environment changed.

Yet so often we assume the current environment leading to current scores are somehow neutral or natural.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Mansa Keita

Dr. Mansa Keita Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rasmansa

15 Sep
"If Richard Spencer was marching for women’s rights, I’d have no issue marching next to him."

Fascists feast upon weak mentalities to harm their victims.

No, you absolutely never need to think it's a good idea to march with Nazis. Angel indicating he'd march...
This isn't even such a foreign discussion, as eugenicists were complaining in Quillette that if we support women's rights to choose, we should stop opposing their own eugenic ideology so strongly. Eugenics Monthly wants more...
If it's your march and a Nazi shows up to march with you, you should make it clear you don't want to associate with Nazis.

It doesn't seem complicated, for most people.
Read 4 tweets
8 Sep
This is a terrible comment. People have been asking her to chill for days now and she just keeps digging.

Even in America, white supremacists have and continue to target Jews as well as African-Americans, even if in different ways.
In almost every phase of civil rights struggles, for over a century now, Jews are blamed for planting ideas in the heads of black folks who apparently can't think.

It was a theme during segregation and you see it today still with the (((Soros))) stuff.
Anti-Semitism and anti-black racism almost always goes hand in hand in America. White supremacists will make common cause with one against the other when convenient, but that alliance will always be conditional on it not yet being your turn.
Read 4 tweets
3 Sep
You've got to appreciate the ability to create connections where none exist.

Turns out Republicans only decided to fight abortion rights because of college social justice activists.
For those who don't get me, my point is the two things have nothing to do with each other, and condemning college students in order to condemn Republicans is not logical, but clearly ideological.

It's as silly as those who blamed "wokeness" for the Taliban retaking Afghanistan.
A good thread on what many people were seeing and how this often works.

Read 4 tweets
31 Aug
On moral issues, "neutrality" is a strange choice. Either one doesn't believe the issue significant enough to care, or one has chosen the side that's currently dominant.
I definitely accept that there are moral issues I'm complicit on in terms of not being active behind my stance. But taking a clear stance in terms of words is easy, and is the least that should be expected.
Those who can't so much as lend their voice to a moral cause when prompted, have instead used their silence to speak loudly in the other direction.
Read 4 tweets
30 Aug
So much of the conversations on Twitter are driven by subtext, unstated implications that people some will pick up on, but always leaving room for deniability.
I notice this a lot on the center and right. I've seen people say "the science says...", then when you ask them questions directly derived from that position, they go mum or evasive. It's a weird form of political correctness often from people who state they aren't PC.
This dependence on subtext happens a lot around topics of race and racism, because people accept that certain things aren't socially acceptable to say around race, but they believe it, so they hint.

Things like "increasing the number of black students reduces school quality"
Read 6 tweets
28 Aug
Alright, Man City vs Arsenal live thread here.

I'll start off by saying I've already written this game off as a loss for Arsenal, but I would love to be surprised.
Decent start from Arsenal so far. They don't look fragile so far and look intent to do something in the final third
Wow, as usual, too easy. There's no reason they should've allowed such an easy goal.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(