I've talked to dozens of antiabortion protestors since I got to Texas: I've yet to find someone who is planning to file a tip or a lawsuit.
"Why would we?" one protestor said: Abortions have stopped — and a lawsuit would give courts a chance to block the law.
a 🧵on tiplines
Every time I ask Texas Right to Life about their tipline, they shrug it off. No serious tips have come in, they said, because no one is performing abortions. They don't have a test case prepped because they don't need one. They're already winning.
Legally, it's in their best interest *not* to file a lawsuit. This ban has succeeded where others failed because there's been no clear person or group for abortion rights groups to sue. The minute someone files a lawsuit, that changes.
This law is clearly unconstitutional, a violation of Roe v. Wade. So far, no judge has been in a position to consider its constitutionality because of these issues of standing. It's very likely that a lawsuit from antiabortion advocates would lead to the law being overturned.
Now, there could be some rogue antiabortion protestor who decides to say to hell with that, and who files a lawsuit anyway. But the more organized factions that I've been talking to have absolutely no interest.
Abortion providers "are responding to the law without a lawsuit," said John Pisciotta, director of Pro-Life Waco. "So it just doesn't come on my radar screen. We don't need it."
Which leads to the question: How does this law get overturned?
At this point, the best shot abortion rights groups have is to manufacture a lawsuit ... finding a doc who is willing to perform an illegal abortion, and someone who will sue him over it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Six weeks into widespread self-quarantine, editors of academic journals have started noticing a trend: Women — who (ofc) shoulder more family responsibility — seem to be submitting fewer papers than usual. There is some evidence that men are submitting *more.* (a thread)
This could have a major impact on the careers of women in academia, esp women going up for tenure. One expert told me: “We don’t want a committee to look at the outlier productivity of, say, a white hetero man with a spouse at home and say, ‘Well, this person managed it.’”
Men w/ kids are affected, too. But it's useful to look at stop-the-clock tenure policies, which allow parents to delay tenure for 1 yr when they have kids: Women tend to use the time at home primarily/ exclusively for child care. Men “find a way” to do more academic work.
On March 30, @thelilynews asked to hear from women who are self-quarantined alone. We got almost 1,300 responses. Those responses became 20+ interviews, which became 7 stories: one woman living alone in each decade, ages 24 to 86. (a thread)
There have never been this many women living alone. The last time we experienced anything like this — the 1918 flu — most women left their parents' homes to move in with their husbands. Now we're staying single longer, choosing to end marriages or not get married at all.
Some women told us they wish they weren't alone, others said they wouldn't have it any other way. To pass the time, women said they've been trimming hedges, making memes, baking cookies without flour. Some could remember the exact moment they last touched another person.