🧵 on books following SNC guidelines approved by Punjab Curriculum and Textbook board:
I bought these books of Grade 1-5 to ascertain if the Punjab Govt approved textbooks are regressive and will they be detrimental to kids education?
(These 10 books cost me ~ 900 Rps)
In these textbooks, boys and girls are taught not to accept any gifts from strangers and never befriend them.
Hopefully, these lessons will help reduce crimes against children esp sexual crimes as predators entice kids for their criminal activities.
Lessons are added so kids can learn and respect the religious festivals of minorities in Pakistan.
Against prevalent propaganda about girls are ONLY shown as doing house chores or as mothers or housewives, women in these books are also shown as:
Pilots
Lawyers
Businesswomen
Nurse
Doctor
Sportswomen
Also, girls are shown:
•Playing football
•Competing with boys in sporting activities
•Helping their male family members in laborious works as women do in rural areas
•Enjoying rain
Like a normal person etc etc
In the social studies book of grade 4, kids will be taught about:
• Human Rights
• Diversity and Tolerance
•Different Cultures (Punjab books are teaching cultures of other provinces as well)
•Role of Minorities in the creation of Pakistan
My best part is in the Grade 3 book of -- Waakfiyat-e-Aama (General Knowledge) is how to resolve common disagreements, causes of disagreements, and resolving conflicts through discussion, dialogue, and problem-solving methods.
Regarding "all or majority" minor girls shown wearing a scarf/dupatta in textbooks.
Here are pictures from books where some are wearing scarves and some are not.
Yes minors don’t need to wear a hijab but there are those kids in our country too. Girls in rural areas wear scarf or dupattas due to cultural/religious norms.
I am from a village where minor girls wear dupattas or scarves as a cultural norm.
Refer to these pictures.
On religious content in English and Urdu books. Yes, the Punjab textbook board did add it but in my view it's neither controversial nor sectarian.
Check the first picture and read learning outcomes, they are not focusing on religious themes. This is from an English book.
In the General Knowledge book, the awareness lessons are need of the hour & related to current social and climate issues. I.e Water scarcity & deforestation issues.
This is from Grade-2 Book.
It's not that SNC is perfect, there are some flaws too but SNC is a good attempt and much-awaited and delayed start in the nation building.
Unfortunately, Govt, Federal Education Minister & highly qualified SNC director - Dr. Mariam Chughtai are targets of hate and propaganda despite they asked publicly for feedback and are committed to revising. And they never called it an experiment.
Feedback about SNC from someone who is running his own publication house, he listed challenges and issues in SNC. Also, he shared the context and why SNC is needed.
In the 1971 war, there were two active war fronts -- Eastern and Western. 🧵
Much is said and written about the Eastern Front. However, despite the bulk of armed forces being concentrated in the West Pak, Generals' performance at the Western Front was abysmal, to say the least.
Generals planned that if India attacked East Pak, they would open a Western front to make quick gains and force India to halt its ops on the Eastern front.
India attacked East Pak from multiple directions on 21st Nov, yet Gen Yahya did not order the opening of the Western front..
..Infact on 23rd Nov, CGS (Gen Gul) and PAF chief dragged Yahya to the GHQ op room to explain the conditions on the ground and tried to seek a decision to open the front in the west.
General Yahya, even then delayed and promised to make a decision by 27th Nov.
I never claimed these books are anti-Army or anti-Generals, in fact, they are very balanced books. Let's see if the right lessons are learned from these books by those who read them due to "mandatory subscription". A 🧵
In Nov 2011, Twenty-four soldiers were martyred by NATO in Salala checkpost attack.
Neither it was called a 9/11 attack nor did the NATO-US apologize.
In 1992 Commander FCNA - Maj Gen Zaheer Abbasi undertook an unauthorized and costly foray into Indian-held territory in which Pak Army lost ~ 40 men (incl a Brigadier).
Instead of doing a court-martial, he was saved by then DG-ISI Gen Javed. It wasn't called our 9/11.
SSG-trained Commando and (former) COAS Mush went ahead with an ill-planned Kargil op.
More than 400 brave Pak soldiers gave their lives on the hills of Kargil which the Army Chief & his Generals disowned for years.
Result: Mush is celebrated & protected by his fellow Generals.
No, it was the culmination of a year-long frustration & anger built up due to the closure of political, legal, and constitutional avenues. The former PM's violent abduction from IHC by Generals was a triggering point that added fuel to the fire.
Will Generals be able to conquer their countrymen 'again' and impose their own will as they've done since 1953?
Definitely yes, they have a monopoly on violence, have all the resources & tools at their disposal to manipulate, and now they have the full support of PDM..
On this day (26th March) in 1971, General Yahya ordered Operation Searchlight in East Pakistan.
General Yahya said:
"The killing of a few thousand would not be too high a price for keeping the country together. Show them the teeth and they will be quiet."
In Feb-1971, General Yakub, commander of the east command, opposed any military action in East Pak and predicted that Army will not be able to defend East Pak in the absence of a political solution.
His prediction proved to be right - word by word.
As General Yakub predicted, as soon Operation Searchlight commenced, East Bengal Regiments and East Pakistan Rifles rebelled.
To counter Fatima Jinnah's support & popularity. Gen Ayub used religious clerics, Pirs and Sufis to issue a fatwa against a woman becoming head of state.
Maulana Abdul Aziz's (Laal Masjid Khatib) father was awarded by Ayub for giving a fatwa against Fatima Jinnah's candidature.
General Ayub in his speeches urged the public "not to put their trust in a woman candidate". He called her old and senile not fit to lead Pakistan as she would bring chaos, disorder, and instability.
Ayub's govt even accused Fatima Jinnah of being on the payroll of the US.
Fatima Jinnah ignored personal attacks but one time she took exception and retorted:
"I possess shoulders which are stronger than those of a Field Marshal and my brain is unclogged and my vision unblurred by the intoxication of power."