"Even when it acts against our best interest our tendency is to be consistent with our prior commitments, ideas, thoughts, words, and actions." ->
"Part of the reason this happens is our desire to appear and feel like we’re right. We also want to show people our conviction. This shouldn’t come as a surprise. Society values consistency and conviction even when it is wrong." ->
"And the more we invest in our beliefs of ourselves or others—think money, effort, or pain, the more sunk costs we have and the harder it becomes to change our mind. It doesn’t matter if we’re right." ->
So every time someone masks their kid, or gets jabbed, a massive amount of commitment bias comes with it.
Voila, they are now a foot soldier, willingly or unwillingly doing the authoritarians' bidding - they are now invested through their seemingly (to some) innocuous actions->
"Commitment can be so dangerous because it is like a slippery slope – you only need a single slip to slide down completely. Therefore compliance to even tiny requests, which initially appear insignificant, have a good probability of leading to full commitment later." ->
"People whose job it is to persuade us know this.
A great case study for compliance is the tactics that Chinese soldiers employed on American war captives during the Korean War. The Chinese were particularly effective in getting Americans to inform on one another."
"In their exploits the Chinese relied heavily on commitment and consistency tactics to receive the compliance they desired.
They started with seemingly small but frequent requests to repeat statements like “The United States is not perfect..." ->
and, "In a Communist country, unemployment is not a problem.” Once these requests had been complied with, the heaviness of the requests grew.
Someone who had just agreed that US wasn't perfect would be encouraged to expand on his thoughts about specific imperfections. ->
Later he might be asked to write up and read out a list of these imperfections in a discussion group with other prisoners. “After all, it’s what you really believe, isn’t it?”
Suddenly the soldier would find himself a “collaborator” of the enemy. ->
See some parallels here?
"Just wear a mask, what's the big deal?"
"It's just a prick, what's the big deal?"
Boom, you're a collaborator.
That is if you aren't paying attention and aren't aware of these tendencies.
Please pay attention, be aware, don't become an unwitting drone. It's ok to realize you've been duped and that not continuing to concede personal agency is the right path.
The enemy is not a virus. Its much more sinister than that.
Lest anyone misinterpret the meaning here: actions lead to commitment whether you know it or not. Are jabs useful for some? Likely. Should they be mandated for low risk or immune folks? Or course not. But you may believe otherwise if you are unknowingly committed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Remember when Sweden was the punching bag of the media and various SM panic-pushers? No? That’s because no one talks about them anymore. Because they didn’t lock down and their outcome was significantly better. Cant have that! First the data, then some greatest anti-Sweden hits->
Let's counter the "dirty irredeemable unjabbed red states are causing all our problems" BS narrative with a wee bit of data shall we? Looking at Rt values (the Effective Reproduction Rate: <1.0=infections fizzling out, >1.0 = infections increasing). Higher value = more spread.
This data is available to all courtesy of covidestim.org. Note that downward trending curves, even if now > 1.0, mean the wave will be fizzling soon.
First, the media and the White House's bogeyman, Ron DeSantis' FL. They are so terrified of DeSantis you can taste it. Apparently so is the virus. Rt 0.97, plummeting.
“The holocaust didn’t start with gas chambers.
It started with apartheid.
It started with scapegoating an ‘out’ group which could be blamed for worsening living conditions as the wages of working people were siphoned off by the corporatist state.”
So there you have the real reason for the “nonvax folks are endangering vaxed folks” media rhetoric. A wholly nonsensical argument if you think it is directed at public health. But completely understandable if the purpose is to create division.
Seen plenty of indoctrinated drones regurgitating this divisive garbage all weekend, full of “I hope they die, or have their rights stripped, or I hate them all” missives. It’s working on some folks too far gone to understand how they are being manipulated.
Variants/☠️Scariants👻revisited through the learned and wise words of Oxford's Dr Sunetra Gupta.
(stay tuned to the end of the thread for some fun with clowns 🤡🤡!)
1/12
Unlike the usual pop-scientist riff raff, Dr Gupta has:
✅spent much of her career researching variants in a variety of pathogens
✅has a large NEGATIVE incentive to speak out
I.e., the type of expert that matters.
Dr Gupta:
"One very unlikely outcome is that a virus will mutate to become more virulent and more transmissible. Much more likely the mutations = small marginal changes that will allow the recent version to barely outcompete the old version."
When someone shows you who they are, believe them; the first time. - Maya Angelou
Have they been using fear to manipulate you because they care about you? Should anyone who uses these tactics be allowed to govern anything? @ZubyMusic@PanData19@NickHudsonCT
Lest anyone doubt the claims that several global organizations have deliberately used psychological tactics to manipulate the public, the proof is lying in plain sight. telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness…
@katewand and @FatEmperor on 🔥with new videos. To understand the COVID fiasco, we must look well beyond medicine and public “health”. First tho, which of these is an evil super villain? A, B, or C all of the above?
Watch the video to understand the agenda Ernst Stavro Schwabfeld has in store for everyone. Learn how the WEF has been planning and waiting for years on a 2020 - as a ticket to collectivist hell.
Milton Friedman:
“A society that aims for equality before liberty will end up with neither equality or liberty. You can only aim at equality by giving some people the right to take things from others...”