we moved out to the suburbs this week. still tidying up the old apartment, but we're sleeping at the new place.
im a bit surprised to find that i actually like a suburban home an awful lot
some time ago i took a medium dose of a tryptamine and among other things considered my relationship with work. one thing that I realized was that in fact I was holding myself back from some of the drudgery of the job for reasons of identity
i actually monologued about it to @selentelechia. something like:
"the thing is i think ive been approaching work and meetings and schedules and corporate life like im too cool for it. (pause) which. I am"
and nevertheless here i am living in a boring suburban house with a yard and owning a car and having a wife and a baby and actually paying attention to work and busting my ass every day
and it feels good actually
I spent some time turning this over as i drove to the store to get dinner for my wife and it was productive.
two points
1. there are several major periods in a person's life. some of them are biologically linked, others not. they are not of fixed duration. most are common but some are not.
examples from my life include infancy, adolescence, young adulthood, whatever im in now
the demands of life and desires of the heart are very different across these phases. a schoolboy wants very different things, and needs to be a different sort of person, than a breadwinner
2. letting ones desires and identity transition to accommodate the demands of a new phase is disorienting and possibly the most challenging part of a person's life, and stumbling may be the source of many hard lives.
I am imagining two main classes of failure modes here
the first failure mode is the obvious one of not letting oneself change. i had been stumbling about with this one without knowing it for a while by keeping work (which does actually matter) at arms length from what I imagined my life to be about
the second failure mode is swerving so hard into the new phase that one fails to integrate it with their past lives
this is subtler and I don't have any clean examples from fiction but I suspect its nevertheless a real problem
im imagining the damage from such a failure as the debris of broken relationships and a loss of personal meaning, of waking up at 45 and getting a divorce and a sports car and getting hair plugs and wondering what has happened with your life
I hate a lot of things about _American Beauty_ but maybe it does get this right
I dont know that I have any good advice about how to manage this apart from "this happens, and remember that scylla and charybdis bound these channels"
let your identity be flexible as your needs change I guess, while tending to things you care about to keep them continuous
the reason that nerds are unhappy about trump firing federal reserve people isnt because they particularly like those specific people
issue is that it makes the fed look beholden to the executive and this is a very bad outcome for economic stability
the fed hasnt covered itself in glory lately for sure but the counterfactual where its progressively and openly politicized is pretty much just a world of hyperinflation and impoverishment because thats a side effect of how unstable governments use politicized central banks
i think a steelman for "end the fed" is that we've left this absurdly powerful yet nigh defenseless institution sitting in plain sight like a loaded gun during a period of immensely high trust and as that period comes to a close someone is gonna make a first grab at the pistol
ok finally discovered a kind of lore i want to know about in a non clickbait way:
what one-shotted you?
eg for me it was 90s movies about how having a career and a house in the burbs is the worst thing that can ever happen to someone
i didn't realize i'd been Had until my 30s
everyone will give boomers and millennials shit about the social justice and narcissism, and rightly so. but the motherfuckers who tricked me into nearly ruining my life are genx
for those of you not familiar getting one shotted is getting wrecked on first contact with something. classic deployment attached
"everyone is the same and nations are fake" is the core dogma of the mid-late 20C liberalism that grew out of the war era. in the years since it's become a mostly-unstated and broadly-unassailable assumption of imperial policy
regrettably it is also disastrously incorrect
the history of this idea is worth studying. you can see the modern notion start to emerge in the progressive era and out of socialist thought, and gain some traction with (eg) the league of nations
ideologues might say that league failed bc it wasn't REAL world government
among socialism-inclined intellectuals, which is to say nearly all intellectuals until molotov-ribbentrop broke some out of their reveries, ww1 was understood to be a failure _caused by_ national identity
the leftist compulsion to degrade national identity in democratic countries will be the undoing of their welfare state plank, because it turns out when you remove the nation people just default to narrower identities and don't care to pay for the outgroup's well-being
you can get support for fargroups in time limited cases. there's a long history of (eg) american assistance for people on the other side of the world in disaster recovery
but duration breeds resentment, and organized charity is very hard to maintain with this sentiment
when you're talking about an outgroup for whom that resentment is ingrained and continuously salient, forget it
"multiculturalism" kills welfare states in the long run
amusingly this was one reason some of the more libertarian neoliberals supported open borders
i was disappointed that liberals did nothing in the face of the awokening. but that can at least be explained as cowardess
what's worse is that the awokening is over, they're not taking the fact that the awokening occurred as a serious problem to be guarded against going forward
one is left with the impression that either they are fine with everything that happened or they learned absolutely nothing from the experience. both of these possibilities seem disqualifying
what is the point of liberals who can't be bothered to care for liberty, one wonders