A quick thread on Jay Powell and bank consolidation.

Tl;dr: By waving through bank mergers, Powell has undermined the Biden Administration's professed commitment to enhancing competition. The President should replace him as Fed Chair.
Under Powell's leadership, the Fed has been a rubber stamp for bank mergers.

The Powell Fed approved 95% of merger applications in 2018 (up from ~80% under Obama Admin). The Powell Fed also approved contested mergers at record speed: four months, on average (down from ~1 year).
The Powell Fed has also approved increasingly large mergers.

In 2012, Gov. Tarullo announced a presumption against acquisitions by GSIBs. Powell reversed course, approving Morgan Stanley-E*Trade. Powell also approved Truist and PNC mergers, creating 6 & 7th biggest U.S. banks.
Lax bank merger oversight hurts consumers and the economy. Bank mergers increase costs and reduce availability of financial services. They lead to branch closures. Small bus. lending declines. Negative consequences are particularly harmful for LMI areas. theconversation.com/biden-wants-to…
Powell's permissive approach to bank mergers undermines policies promoting full employment.

Bank consolidation has been shown to lead to higher unemployment and lower wages. If you care about full employment, you should care about bank mergers!

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
The other contender for Fed Chair, Gov. Lael Brainard, has been much better on bank mergers.

She voted against Morgan Stanley-E*Trade and Toronto Dominion-Schwab. She abstained on PNC-BBVA.

In May, she urged the Board to "undertake a broader review" of its merger framework.
The Fed Chair is critical to bank merger policy for two reasons:

1. The Chair sets the agenda.

2. It's a numbers game. The Biden Admin likely needs Powell's seat to have a majority in favor of stronger merger oversight. politico.com/newsletters/mo…
The White House issued an E.O. in July calling on bank regulators to "revitalize" bank merger oversight. That plan is due early next year.

Given Powell's track record, the White House should look elsewhere for a Fed Chair to lead that rethink.
whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeremy Kress

Jeremy Kress Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jeremy_Kress

19 Dec 19
Unsurprisingly, big-bank lawyer Thomas Vartanian opposes @SenWarren and @RepChuyGarcia's Bank Merger Review Modernization Act, based on my research.

I want to explain why Vartanian's critiques are misleading, disingenuous, and flat-out wrong. /1

americanbanker.com/opinion/fix-cr…
I've already rebutted the argument that @CFPB doesn't need a separate say on bank mergers b/c it has a seat on the FDIC board.

The FDIC doesn't oversee the biggest mergers. And even if it did, its focus is safety-and-soundness, not consumer protection.

Vartanian doesn't want transparency into the secret "pre-screening" meetings banks have with regulators about potential mergers.

But those conversations pre-dispose regulators to approve mergers, tilting the scales in favor of consolidation. Transparency would limit that effect.
Read 9 tweets
6 Dec 19
I've seen arguments (in @morningmoneyben and elsewhere) that the Warren/Garcia proposal to give the @CFPB a say in bank mergers is unnecessary because the CFPB Director already sits on the FDIC Board.

I want to explain why these arguments are wrong. 1/
First, the largest banks and bank holding companies are within the OCC's and Fed's jurisdiction - not the FDIC's.

So the CFPB is currently excluded from reviewing mergers involving the banks it supervises (those with >$10B in assets). 2/
Second, even if the FDIC had authority over a big-bank merger, the CFPB Director could be outvoted by the FDIC's other four members, whose primary focus is safety-and-soundness, not consumer protection.

That's precisely the reason the CFPB was created in the first place! /3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(