1/ Explaining the Recent Failure of Value Investing (Lev, Srivastava)
"We identify two reasons for the failure of value investing: (1) accounting deficiencies and (2) fundamental economic developments which slowed down mean reversion of value & glamour."
2/ "The value strategy had already lost much of its potency in the late 1980s and yielded negative returns in the 1990s, barring a brief resurgence in 2000-2006.
"The expensing of intangibles started to have a major effect on book values and earnings in the late 1980s."
3/ "The effect of our intangibles book-value adjustments are more pronounced for glamour than for value stocks. Among glamour stocks, our adjustments had a larger effect on small than large companies, since small, high-growth glamour firms tend to invest heavily in intangibles."
4/ "We also adjusted the earnings of P/E, adding back to earnings the annual R&D expense and the part of SG&A related to intangibles and subtracting from earnings the annual amortization of the R&D and SG&A capitals. The improvement was substantially lower than for book values."
5/ "In any case, whether guided by the M/B ratio or the P/E ratio, the recent 10-12 years' returns from value investing were unusually low, leading us to continue the quest for the reasons for the recent failure of value investing."
6/ "All our measures indicate a substantial slowdown of the mean reversion of both value and glamour stock in the past 12 years, accounting for much of the decline of the profitability of value investing."
7/ "By practically any measure of operating performance, the profitability of value firms deteriorated sharply since the financial crisis and remained at a historically low level up to the present [2018]."
8/ "Without internal funds and with very limited access to the stock and debt markets, most value firms were unable in recent years to pick themselves up.
"Investment in this group of poor performers, trapped in low-valuation, was a losing proposition from 2007 to 2018."
9/ "Overall, internal investments in traditional intangibles, like R&D, brands, information technology, and tangible investments, as well as the lesser visible investments in organization capital, or management, were the main drivers of growth in market value from 2008 to 2017."
1/ Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game (Michael Lewis)
"Baseball was at the center of a story about the possibilities—and limits—of reason. It showed how an unscientific culture responds (or fails to respond) to the scientific method." (p. xiv)
2/ "A small group of undervalued professional players & executives, many of whom had been rejected as unfit for the big leagues, turned themselves into one of the most successful franchises.
"How did one of the poorest teams, the Oakland Athletics, win so many games?" (p. xi)
3/ "Hitting statistics were abundant & had, for James, the powers of language. They were, in his Teutonic coinage, 'imagenumbers.' Literary material. When you read them, they called to mind pictures. He wrote... 'To get 191 hits in a season demands (or seems to) a consistency...
3/ "Value, momentum & defensive/quality applied to US individual stocks has a t-stat of 10.8. Data mining would take nearly a trillion random trials to find this.
"Applying those factors (+carry) across markets and asset classes gets a t-stat of >14."
2/ "The model's four terms describe different life stages for an individual who marries during the sample period. The intercept reflects the average life satisfaction of individuals in the baseline period [all noncohabiting years that are at least one year before marriage]."
3/ " 'How satisfied are you with your life, all things considered?' Responses are ranked on a scale from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied).
"We center life satisfaction scores around the annual mean of each population subsample in the original population."
1/ Short-sightedness, rates moves and a potential boost for value (Hanauer, Baltussen, Blitz, Schneider)
…
* Value spread remains wide
* Relationship between value and rates is not structural
* Extrapolative growth forecasts drive the value premium
… robeco.com/en-int/insight…
2/ "The valuation gap between cheap and expensive stocks remains extremely wide. This signals the potential for attractive returns going forward."
3/ "We observe a robust negative relationship between value returns and changes in the value spread.
"The intercept of ≈10% can be interpreted as a cleaner estimate of the value premium, given that it is purged of the time-varying effects of multiple expansions & compressions."