@rplzzz nothing to apologize for! i don't think you'll be surprised i see it differently. if we're in a game with two sides, they are better characterized as "activists" and "everyone else" than left vs right or trumpist antivaxxers vs the rest of us or all of that. 1/
@rplzzz most of the unvaccinated are not diehard (they die too easily) political intransigents. yet most are either attached to minority communities or trumpish political communities. but most of the unvaccinated attached to trumpist political communities are not politically motivated 2/
@rplzzz intransigents, but when they are surveyed express a broad range of hesitancies not dissimilar from those of minority communities — prefer to wait and see, don't want to be guinea pig, not so worried about COVID, can't afford time off for side effects — etc. 3/
@rplzzz the correlation with trumpist political communities is an effect at the margin. in blue communities, political conformity pushes people on the margin (a lot of people, who don't like shots and don't have time and don't follow this stuff so carefully!) towards vaccination. 4/
@rplzzz in red communities the same conformity reinforces the hesitant's inertia. so we get a strong net differential between communities, but a small fraction of the unvaccinated is politically motivated intransigent refusal. most is wait and see i dunno maybe next week. 5/
@rplzzz taking the negative partisanship of grifters and electeds (the venn overlap there is large) as representative of the communities they "represent" is deeply mistaken. politicians are broadly disliked by ordinary humans, their side as well as the other. 6/
@rplzzz our political parties (both of them) rely for stability of incumbency and power on a public segmented to dislike the other side more than they dislike (most of us profoundly dislike) their "own". 7/
@rplzzz some stories (an effective tactic, in part because we play into it) red grifters currently use to make sure blue is scary are stories about authoritarianism under "science" pretext (they sure love talking up Australia these days!) attached to predatory 8/
@rplzzz motivations (pharma, pedophilia). the second amendment is so necessary precisely because sanctimonious predators who claim the banner of science mean to disarm you so they can do with you as they will. 9/
@rplzzz obviously, this is turning certain germs of truth (there really is a lot of greed-motivated overmedicalizing) into a vast conspiracy to which school teachers and middle management professionals somehow become attached. 10/
@rplzzz but it is more credible, and more frightening, in red communities that blue stories of racist authoritarianism deriving from their friends with firearms. all of these stories are pretty terrible, and most people just try to ignore them and be nice to one another. 11/
@rplzzz but electeds pay to the very narrow group of motivated voters who participate or might be moved to participate in primary elections. that is representative of almost nobody. a red elected in a red district does not fear defection to blue, because negative partisanship is 12/
@rplzzz strong and party ID is stable. he worries about primary challengers, and so seeks to outloony any comers. 13/
@rplzzz in my view the problem we face is almost entirely a side effect of the structure of this political game. "real americans" — red and blue! — hate it all, try to live, try to be nice to each other. 14/
@rplzzz the game that you describe, where some mass blue and red engage in tit-for-tat decentralized social unpleasantness with one another is not the game we're in, but it's the game we risk falling into if we let the clowns our politically system structurally elevates stand-in for 15/
@rplzzz and poison our regard for fellow citizens. i am desperate to reform our present politics out of anything like their contemporary existence, these risks are truly existential. 16/
@rplzzz but they don't derive from your neighbor who voted for Trump and worries about being a guinea pig when you ask why he's not vaxxed (or has been persuaded that it's gene therapy, or whatever). this is all collateral social damage from a game of thrones. it is our great fortune 17/
@rplzzz that the broad masses still see it that way, and try to avoid politics in every day life and just get along with one another. it would be a very terrible thing if those masses really adopt with a sense of personal grievance the identities politicos and grifters are working 18/
@rplzzz desperately to attach to them. Encouraging people not to be kind to one another, to view their neighbors through and then shame them because of their political affiliations and inchoate correlates like vaccination hesitancy is a tactic that invites this kind of catastrophe. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Randy Waldman

Steve Randy Waldman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @interfluidity

24 Jul
polio vaccination is often performed sequentially, first with a very safe inactivated virus vaccine, then with a riskier attenuated live virus. the first vaccination renders the second one much less dangerous. cochrane.org/CD011260/BEHAV… 1/
given the extraordinary transmissibility of delta and frequent reports of usually mild “breakthrough infections”, i wonder if the end game here is that we’ll be dragged involuntarily through an analogous protocol. 2/
the role of vaccination becomes not to prevent infection, but to ensure the infection that eventually (hopefully) deepens and completes our immunity is very mild. 3/
Read 8 tweets
23 Jul
i agree very much with @jp_koning, fiat money is not a meme. but i don't think characterizing it as a conventional debt instrument quite works either. 1/ jpkoning.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-do…
suppose Bill Gates were to issue a perpetual, never redeemable, non-interest-bearing Gatescoin. Bill Gates' solvency, on its own, would tell us little about its value. 2/
owing to his solvency, Bill Gates would have the capacity to *give* such a coin value, say by committing to put a floor under it in the market, or by creating circumstances in which markets perceive such a commitment. 3/
Read 7 tweets
21 Jun
this idea that an institutionally legal but morally stolen election (say legislatures in key states overrule voters, citing “irregularities”) will be prevented on the streets risks a first time as farce, second time as tragedy catastrophe. 1/
every stern denouncement of the 1/6 “insurrection”, every demand on Rachel Maddow that a tough, militarized response should have crushed the insurgents to spare our legislators their traumas, will be hauled out. 2/
provocateurs will intentionally seed chaos in order to force law enforcement and the military, who were and would be appropriately reticent to intervene in this kind of thing heavy handedly, to suppress “the riots”. 3/
Read 6 tweets
20 Jun
so often we treat normative problems as positive problems. pre-ACA one might have done all kinds of modeling of the causes of health care uninsuredness, but the meaningful cause was absence of policy. (and it still is!) 1/
positive, empirical work is what most social scientists do. data is “receipts”, authority, publications. “surely we need to understand the problem if we are going to solve it.” 2/
but absent strong levers to anchor outcomes, social affairs can be endlessly complex, so noisy our models decide what we see, and modelers with divergent priors will never agree. 3/
Read 5 tweets
8 Jun
This by @mattyglesias is very good. But as he hints in the concluding sentence, it’s no good blaming a mass audience, because a mass audience isn’t a locus that can be held accountable. 1/ slowboring.com/p/media-negati…
The institutions through which mass audiences exert effects can be held accountable, and are malleable. 2/
And “true” public preferences are more complicated than mass audience click throughs. Altering institutions for better outcomes need imply neither censorship nor elite paternalism. 3/
Read 8 tweets
6 Jun
can we please unbundle redistricting reform from the For The People Act and see who wants to go on record in favor of redistricting? 1/
these very aggregated bills destroy Congressional accountability. you can always find cover to support or not yo somewhere in the thing. 2/
this issue is universal. one of the Congresspeople I most admire is @BernieSanders. he votes for the awful 90s crime bill because it includes the valuable Violence Against Women Act. what are we supposed to do with that? /fin
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(