1/ This is a very important and courageous study. Forever cardiologists have shunned emergency PCI for cardiac arrest because it will mess up their numbers. Even with STEMI.

nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
2/ Interventional cardiologists are graded by mortality rates. So OHCA patients have always been a PCI do-not-touch scenario. Even though we know that many arrests result from ACS.
3/ This led to an incredible realization for me, according to the great Karl Kern, that acute coronary occlusions do not always lead to STEMI. Cardiologists rely on STEMI to trigger emergency PCI because it is specific and reliable for ACS.
4/ Some acute coronary occlusions manifest as cardiac arrest without STEMI. So why not try emergency PCI for all OHCA? This study is a bold foray into this question.
5/ It would seem that routine PCI saves lives, but at the cost of worse neurological outcomes. My guess is that the craziness of the intervention might intefere with the brain protection.
6/ I’m not even saying hypothermia. Which might help or might not. Hypotension and desats can also injure the post arrest brain. The reperfused ischemic brain is pretty sensitive.
7/ My buddy @emcrit Scott Weingart made the observation that coronary syndromes especially like to cause VF arrest. So maybe the next step is a similar study restricted to shockable rhythms? /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephan A Mayer

Stephan A Mayer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stephanamayer

18 Jun
1/ So now it's the cataclysmic TTM -2 trial, just published in @NEJM. How can a world changing trial like HACA published in 2002 now be effectively reversed almost 20 years later? I will explain.

nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
2/ Lots of head scratching. Hard to understand. But I am not surprised. It's a pattern that we have seen before with goal directed therapy for sepsis and intensive insulin therapy for hyperglycemia. The answer is that a trial's results depend very much on the clinical milieu
3/ When Manny Rivers published his EGDT classic in the @nejm in 2001, the milieu was bad sepsis therapy. The control group was neglected, under-resuscitated, anemic nursing home patients. I remember these shocky patients in the in ER those days, waiting for hours for an ICU bed.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(