Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act is a special act & local law. Therefore, the powers u/s 451, 452 & 457 of CrPC (relating to custody & disposal of property) being general provisions are not invocable in respect of proceedings under the Act, observed #AllahabadHC
In the present case an F.I.R. (21.9.20) was registered where the vehicle stated to be carrying the animals was seized, in Ballia UP and proceedings were initiated.
Subsequently,Magistrate upon taking into
consideration the scheme of the Act, refused to release the vehicle
The counsel for the applicant contended in the HC that ,since the vehicle had
been confiscated, the courts below have committed an error in
rejecting the application for release, ignoring the powers
exercisable us 451 and 457 of the Code.
AGA
, to the contrary stated that the
proceedings have been initiated under the PCSA, which is a
Special Act, and provides a separate procedure with regard to
confiscation and seizure under s 5-A.
The PCSA is an Act to prevent the slaughter of cow and
its progeny in the State of UP. Sec 5-A of the Act
which is with regard to regulation on transport of cow, etc., and
is relevant for the purposes of the controversy involved in the
present case : #AllahabadHC
“Sec 5-A sub sec (11) would go to show that the scheme
of the Act provides a complete procedure with regard to
proceedings relating to confiscation and release,” noted Bench.
Bench further relied on sec 5 of CrPC ( saving clause) and as per
terms “thereof nothing contained in the Code shall, in the
absence of a specific provision to the contrary, affect any
special or local law for the time being in force...”
The normal rule of
interpretation that the special provision must prevail over the
general and if a case is covered by a special provision, the
general provision would not be attracted, would be applicable : #AllahabadHC
The vehicle in question having been confiscated
& seized in exercise of powers us 5-A of the
PCSA, which a special Act & a local law
us 5 of the Code, would clearly have the
effect of denuding the Magistrate of his power to pass any order under provisions of Crpc: Bench
Thus, the application u/s 482 of Crpc to release the vehicle during the pendency of proceedings under PCSA, was dismissed.
Delhi High Court to hear today Centre’s objection to the maintainability of a plea filed by banned organisation Popular Front of India (PFI) challenging the UAPA Tribunal’s order upholding the five-year ban imposed by the Central Government.
The matter is listed before a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela.
Counsel for PFI: May I be permitted to hand over a note of the arguments that I have prepared?
Supreme Court to shortly hear YouTuber and podcaster Ranveer Allahabadia aka 'BeerBiceps' plea over multiple FIRs filed against him for controversial remarks on the YouTube show 'India's Got Latent'.
Court had earlier in February granted interim relief to Allahabadia.
🗳️ One Nation, One Election — the big debate unfolds at Delhi High Court today!
Union Ministers, senior jurists & legal minds come together to discuss the future of India’s democracy. 🇮🇳⚖️
#OneNationOneElection
@byadavbjp @arjunrammeghwal @HiteshJ1973
Lawbeat’s @SukritiMishra12 with insights
Hitesh Jain, Member Law Commission of India: The simultaneous election (also known as One Nation One Election) is not a debate that has started recently. Why it matters today?…Everybody is aware of the cost that goes in, for each election. For the fairness of elections; the opposition parties should welcome this, instead of opposing it. Parties get a level playing field.
Delhi High Court hears plea by UK-based arms consultant Sanjay Bhandari challenging a trial court order declaring him a “fugitive economic offender.”
Bench: Justice Neena Bansal Krishna
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Sanjay Bhandari, read out the extradition warrant issued against his client. According to his submission, the warrant stood executed on 8 July 2021.
Sibal refers to Section 4 of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 (FEOA).
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal for Bhandari: They claim to have reason to believe that I owe tax of more than Rs 100 crores. However, in the impugned order itself, you will find that sometimes the amount is shown as less than Rs 100 crores and sometimes as more; they are not even sure.
Supreme Court to hear a plea by cartoonist Hemant Malviya, accused of drawing a caricature showing the Rashtriya Swayam Sewak (RSS) and Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi in an undignified manner.
Bench: Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice NV Anjaria
In July the Court had granted anticipatory bail to the Cartoonist. Malviya had also tendered an apology, through his Counsel, Advocate Vrinda Grover for the posts and stated that he would delete the same.
Matter taken up.
Advocate Vrinda Grover appears for Hemant Malviya.
Grover: In conformity with the earlier order, i have placed the apology both in English translation that would be on record. I’ve also served the other side. I want to supplement it with a statement that I’m making. I am not very advected to technology either.
A plea by Kerala Governor, in his capacity as Chancellor of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, challenging HC order that upheld quashing of two temporary VC appointments made by the former Governor.
The Court is to finalise names for Select Committee to appoint regular VC today.
Matter taken up.
Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta appears for the State.
Attorney General is in his legs in another court.
J. Pardiwala: Are all the lists ready?
Sr Adv Gupta hands over a list of 4 members by State of Kerala for the appointment of search committee. He informs the Bench that here only 2 Universities are concerned.