Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act is a special act & local law. Therefore, the powers u/s 451, 452 & 457 of CrPC (relating to custody & disposal of property) being general provisions are not invocable in respect of proceedings under the Act, observed #AllahabadHC
In the present case an F.I.R. (21.9.20) was registered where the vehicle stated to be carrying the animals was seized, in Ballia UP and proceedings were initiated.
Subsequently,Magistrate upon taking into
consideration the scheme of the Act, refused to release the vehicle
The counsel for the applicant contended in the HC that ,since the vehicle had
been confiscated, the courts below have committed an error in
rejecting the application for release, ignoring the powers
exercisable us 451 and 457 of the Code.
AGA
, to the contrary stated that the
proceedings have been initiated under the PCSA, which is a
Special Act, and provides a separate procedure with regard to
confiscation and seizure under s 5-A.
The PCSA is an Act to prevent the slaughter of cow and
its progeny in the State of UP. Sec 5-A of the Act
which is with regard to regulation on transport of cow, etc., and
is relevant for the purposes of the controversy involved in the
present case : #AllahabadHC
“Sec 5-A sub sec (11) would go to show that the scheme
of the Act provides a complete procedure with regard to
proceedings relating to confiscation and release,” noted Bench.
Bench further relied on sec 5 of CrPC ( saving clause) and as per
terms “thereof nothing contained in the Code shall, in the
absence of a specific provision to the contrary, affect any
special or local law for the time being in force...”
The normal rule of
interpretation that the special provision must prevail over the
general and if a case is covered by a special provision, the
general provision would not be attracted, would be applicable : #AllahabadHC
The vehicle in question having been confiscated
& seized in exercise of powers us 5-A of the
PCSA, which a special Act & a local law
us 5 of the Code, would clearly have the
effect of denuding the Magistrate of his power to pass any order under provisions of Crpc: Bench
Thus, the application u/s 482 of Crpc to release the vehicle during the pendency of proceedings under PCSA, was dismissed.
@ArvindKejriwal @CBIHeadquarters Special Counsel DP Singh, appearing for CBI: Kejriwal is the 'sutradhaar' of the entire excise scam. I will show facts proving the same.
@ArvindKejriwal @CBIHeadquarters Singh: the investigation would have been incomplete without Kejriwal's arrest. Within 1 month of his arrest, CBI filed a chargesheet, therefore showing that the investigation had reached the advanced stage.
#BREAKING Bareilly Court delivers historic verdict, sentencing a woman to 4.5 years in prison for false testimony and false rape accusations. Court justifies sentence, matching it to accused man's time served
"It is highly objectionable to use police and court as medium to achieve one's illegal objective," court said emphasizing fair treatment for both genders
Court also orders the girl to pay Rs. 5,88,822, equivalent to UP government's prescribed unskilled laborer wages, as fine to falsely accused man
#BREAKING_NEWS
The Bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, Delhi High Court to deliver the verdict on the petition of Arvind Kejriwal.
#ArvindKejiwal #ArvindKejriwalArrest #LiquorScamCase @aap @ArvindKejriwal @dir_ed
The Chief Minister of Delhi had challenged his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate concerning the liquor excise policy scam. To read details - ()lawbeat.in/top-stories/ex…
The court is yet to assemble. Meanwhile, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju and Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi have arrived.
Justice expounds on the issues and contentions in the petition.
The court is of the opinion, that several statements recorded by ED are statements of the approver. The statement of Raghav Magunta was recorded by an authorized officer.
#SupremeCourtOfIndia's detailed order on STAYING #AllahabadHighCourt decision of striking down #madarsa Act notes that State does have a legitimate public interest in ensuring that students should receive qualitative education so that they can have a dignified existence.
SC: If the PIL's purpose is to ensure that secular education is provided in Madarsas, suitable directions may be issued to ensure that students are not deprived of the quality of education that is made available by the State in other institutions.
#MadarsaACT #SupremeCourtOfIndia
SC: High Court's view that the statutory Board constituted under the Madarsa Act would amount to a breach of the principles of secularism appears to conflate the concept of Madarsa education....
Prominent lawyers including Harish Salve, Manan Kumar Mishra, Adish Aggarwala, Chetan Mittal, Pinky Anand, Hitesh Jain, Ujjwala Pawar, Uday Holla, Swaroopama Chaturvedi have written to #CJIChandrachud expressing concern over attempts to undermine the judiciary’s integrity.
As per the letter, pressure tactics of this group is most obvious in political cases, particularly those involving political figures accused of corruption.
"These tactics are damaging to our courts and threaten our democratic fabric..", CJI has been told.
Saying that a “My way or the highway” approach is at work, the lawyers have stated that any decision the 'vested interest group' agrees with is hailed but any decision they disagree with is trashed, smeared and disregarded.