On Friday @arad_nir, Israeli journalist, has exposed that according to Philip Dormitzer, Pfizer's Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer (Viral Vaccines), Israel acts as "a sort of a laboratory", and that its MoH is exclusively using the Pfizer product.
@arad_nir pointed out that this was in direct conflict with the statement of Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis (Israel's director of Public Health Services in the MoH) given only 3 weeks ago, when he asked her why does the Israeli citizens are trapped by the Pfizer contract.
The reply of Dr. Alroy-Preis to @arad_nir was that "so first of all, no one has imprisoned us, and there was no phase [where] there was any exclusivity agreement with Pfizer."
Alroy-Preis didn't lie, but she didn't tell the truth... let's break down her statements.
First: "no one has imprisoned us" is a statement of a member of the Ministry of Health, who was "willing to carry out the foregoing pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in (Pfizer manufacturing & supply agreement)", which fully indemnified Pfizer.
Israeli citizens had no ability to choose what vaccine they could get. They were given one choice - Pfizer.
If you want to know how bad that choice was, read this section from my 1st #COptiGate thread.
Second point: there might not have been an exclusivity AGREEMENT, but the "Real-World Epidemiological Evidence Collaboration Agreement" Israel as signed with Pfizer created a de-facto exclusivity. This was the only way this research would have worked.
The Pfizer-Israel project objective was "To measure and analyze epidemiological data arising from the Product (Pfizer vaccine) rollout, to determine whether herd immunity is achieved after reaching a certain percentage of vaccination coverage in Israel."
Look at exhibit A & B. If you had multiple vaccines, Pfizer would not be able to gain anything from the data. The data shared with them would have had to include the other product.
This agreement does not mention any other product nor how it will impact the project.
The Freedom of Information Movement @shakoof asked the MoH to provide the data which was delivered to Pfizer. Here is the post from @Nadav_Eyal on the topic.
In the same file, it is stated that "3. Pfizer were not provided access to databases, but FILES were sent as was attached to section 2 of this response"
The letter does not mention what other files were sent to Pfizer, other than mentioning one more file.
The letter inform some XLS files passed anonymization. 1) According to the contract Pfizer was supposed to receive ONLY de-identified data. 2) Could not in the XLS with such anonymization.
Did Pfizer receive Identifiable Health Information?
Finally - NONE of the files provided by the MoH gives any indication to any other vaccine usage, which should have been given to Pfizer as without it they would not be able to measure the impact of other products.
Sharon Alroy-Preis was one of the co-authors of a Lancet paper about the Impact & effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine. It would be impossible to measure the impact of Pfizer vaccines on cases, hospitalisations, and deaths without exclusivity. gov.il/BlobFolder/new…
As mentioned (#PFIZERLEAK - THE ISRAELI CONNECTION), Sharon Alroy-Preis has conflicts of interests: she works for the MoH, who signed the indemnification contact with Pfizer, and SHE was assigned (in research contract) to decide what data is published.
She is the head of the division which plans, operates and leads the Ministry of Health and the entire health system in the fight against the epidemic, including vaccinations and epidemiological investigations.
Pfizer didn't need an exclusivity agreement, They had Sharon Alroy-Preis who had the power to push an exclusive usage of Pfizer, had the personal motivation to do so, and held a huge power in vetting information relating to the performance of the Pfizer vaccine.
Sharon Alroy-Preis did not lie in her statements to @arad_nir, but she was hiding the truth about the DE-FACTO exclusivity, and I believe it is reasonable to assume she was involved in it, and perhaps chosen for her role because of it.
@arad_nir summarized it best: it is... appropriate that we (the citizens) will be informed that we are part of a medical experiment, ask for our permission and our consent to participate in an experiment of a commercial company which uses the results for their US (FDA approval).
REMEMBER: we are talking about a product that has SEVERE design issues with risks identified in 2011.
Please read about codon optimization and S-2P.
People's health should never be seen as a collateral damage, and NO ONE should be allowed to risk kids!
"Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."
THE GLOBAL IT OUTAGE YOU WITNESSED WAS NOT AN ACCIDENT!
IMPORTANT! The purpose of this thread is to explain non-IT and to non information/cyber security professionals why I believe the outage you are seeing around the world due to the update from #Crowdstrike is not an accident.
Before we begin - introduction.
Hi everyone. My name is Ehden Biber. I'm known as the person behind #PfizerLeak, and most of my writing here on X/Twitter has been on ph@rma related topics. HOWEVER, my professional work has been information security and cybersecurity.
My credentials include:
· Head of information security in Metro Bank (UK).
· Merck/MSD Information security office for Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA).
· Consultant to insurance and financial institutes.
The opinion you are about to read is based on YEARS of experience.
"MEDICAL GENETICS…WILL BE THE SOUL OF PERCISION MEDICINE IN EVERY FIELD"
It is time to expose another member of the W.H.O. science council and her views on genomics and gene therapy (mRNA). Introducing Dr Mary-Claire King.
[Thread]
[1/7]:
[2/7]
Doctor Mary-Claire King is a very known geneticist who has discovered in 1990 BRCA1,which was the first gene for a hereditary form of breast cancer. She is a professor of genome sciences in the university of Washington, Seattle, USA. medgen.uw.edu/people/mary-cl…
[3/7]
Her later work was focused on the genetics of schizophrenia, she is recognized as a pioneer in the development of DNA sequencing for human rights investigations, and she is also a Senior Associate Core Member of the New York Genome Center.
THE COUNCIL: INTRODUCING THE W.H.O. SCIENCE COUNCIL THAT IS ABOUT TO CONTROL YOUR LIFE.
As we approach the final stages of the #WHO coup d'état attempt, it is time to expose the group of unelected people who will control your future and their alarming agenda!
#TheCouncil
[Thread]
2/ In December 2023 the WHO produced a report that sets the stage to radical changes that soon will be enforced all the citizens of the world: make gene therapy (mRNA) key technology in the fight against infectious diseases, cancer, and combat any resistance to such technologies.
3/ It called to develop new gene therapy treatments against pathogens, promote investment in "equitable" development of the technology, use it as THE medical countermeasure mechanism to tackle pandemic threats, and to combat any resistance to the technology ("misinformation").
@robinmonotti 1) He uses the exaggerated Hamas dataset. 2) He uses a definition of children for anyone under 18 years old. 3) He say Palestinians were expelled in 1948, but don't mention many left because Arab nations told them to so they can butcher Jews in the war they started.
More below.
@robinmonotti 4) He compare the number of children who died to the sum total of children died 3 years before. He does not compare it to the number of children who died in other conflicts IN THE REGION, such as in Syria. That like comparing apples and pears.
More below.
@robinmonotti 5) The definition of who is a Palestinian by the UN is ANYONE WHO LIVED IN THE MANDATED PALESTINE FOR TWO YEARS prior to June 1848! No ancestors required!
This also made Egyptians who escaped Egypt not to become work slave in the creation of the Suez canal into Palestinians.
THE AZ STUDY: Why did AZ asked to withdraw their EUA marketing authorisation approval, and how come you didn't hear about it?
Short answer: BECAUSE THEIR LONG TERM SAFETY STUDY SHOWN THAT THEIR COV!D19 SH0TS K!LLED AND HARMED PEOPLE.
Long answer: READ THE THREAD!
#TheAZStudy 1/
2/ As you might have heard, AstraZeneca ASKED in March 2024 to have their COV!D19 SH0TS product approval withdrawn from Europe's EMA. It was not the European Union (EMA) who decided to withdraw their approval due to the damage they caused people. BUT WHY?
3/ To understand what happened, let's start with a QUICK, SHORT reminder (the following 3 posts) before we will go into the details.
I promise you it's worth reading!
29 JANUARY 2021: EMA recommends COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca for authorisation in the EU ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-re…
MURDER, THEY PLANNED.
The mechanism in which the spike protein impacts the mitochondria, and how it leads to myocarditis, heart attacks, cancer, and neurological disorders such as face paralysis, Alzheimer and Parkinson's disease.
Highlights from my latest article.
[THREAD] 1/
2/ In order to encode proteins (including the spike protein), the cells are using a mechanism called tRNA so that the ribosome could translate the mRNA sequence to a protein (or more correctly, to translate each codon to an amino acid).
3/ tRNAs acquire their specific amino acids through a process known as aminoacylation, facilitated by specialized enzymes called Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetases (AARS). The process is fuelled by the energy derived from Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP), created by the mitochondria.