From the start, the challenge of federal #FreeCollege has been making it work in 50 states with 50 higher ed systems (more, really since a state like mine - Michigan - has no system) and, more specifically, how not to reward states for under-investing in higher ed. (1/9)
@chingos wrote about these risks a few years back but my sense is that advocacy and policy folks didn't pay a lot of attention at the time, assuming they could be managed down the road. (2/9) nytimes.com/2019/12/20/ups…
Reality has now set in as House Democratic staff work on the budget reconciliation bill that would set a federal-state free-college partnership in motion. See @kevincarey1's valuable thread about how the sausage-making is going. (3/9)
My 16 years of #CollegePromise research have taught me a few important lessons. One of the biggest is that it is a very bad idea to over-promise and under-deliver when it comes to free college. This is a very popular idea, and expectations are high. (5/9) pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021…
If you want states to buy in to a federal-state partnership, you need to offer terms that are easy to accept and hard to refuse. Medicaid expansion provides troubling lessons -- even with the feds covering almost the entire cost, 12 states still refuse to participate. (6/9)
Ensuring federal funding is generous enough to deliver on the promise of tuition-free cc -- and raising the political costs for state leaders who opt out -- is the only way to get closer to a national system. (7/9)
Today, the ease of navigating the pathway into and through higher ed is deeply conditioned by the state or locality in which one happens to live. It's the downside to federalism. But 15 years of state and local free-college experimentation, upjohn.org/promise/ (8/9)
... an expanding research base, energetic advocacy (@College_Promise@FreeCollegeNow@RiseFreeOrg), bipartisan state action (@TNPromise, @RepDrewHansen), earlier legislation, and Pres. Biden's election, have gotten us closer than we have ever been. Let's get it right. (9/9)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More #FreeCollegeQuestions. OK, you’ve convinced me. I should be willing to pay for other people’s children to go to college because living in a place with a better-educated population is good for society and good for me. It’s an investment worth making. But… (1/9)
Shouldn’t we require these students to major in a useful subject? Perhaps a STEM field or high-demand occupation? Some states in fact have done this – Arkansas and Virginia are among those places where tuition-free college is tied to specific fields of study. (2/9)
This is a poor idea, for both practical and principled reasons. As anyone who works in higher ed knows, students change their majors. A lot. In fact, a 2017 Department of Ed study concluded that nearly a third of students change their majors... (3/9)
My fascination with the free-college idea is well documented. I've spent 14+ years studying it and have written 2.5 books on the subject (#3 is under way). One reason for the fascination is the tremendous flexibility of the idea as witnessed today. michigan.gov/whitmer/0,9309…
The free-college or "Promise" idea is eminently adaptable to all kinds of circumstances and settings. Today, @GovWhitmer announced a version of free college ideally suited to the COVID-19 economic and social crisis.
Governor Whitmer is a genius politician who understands the challenges facing workers and the state, and who avails herself of strong ideas and smart advisers (the opposite of guess who?). With "Futures for Frontliners" and the GI Bill analogy, she has landed on a formula...