Would anyone like a short thread on "why your takeout salad tastes like ass but it was so good at the restaurant" ?
Okay here we go @reconbot. You have likely committed one of two salad sins: 1. Didn't season it 2. Messed up the distribution of ingredients
SEASONING: in their raw form, vegetables taste bitter. The reason veggies taste so good at a restaurant is salt (and possibly a lot of butter).
Salt blocks the bitter receptors on your tongue! π
Takeout salad doesn't come with any salt mixed in because it will wilt leaves and make them limp.
Thus, I always give salad at least a couple salt grinds before tossing it (+ pepper as applicable).
DISTRIBUTION: when you pour dressing out of a little container, especially thicker ones, it ends up in globs. You get a bunch of pieces with too much dressing and a bunch with none. Various bits all sink to the bottom and aren't evenly distributed.
Of course, salads don't come pre-dressed because again, dressing contains salt, and salt will wilt the salad. If there's anything crispy (croutons), it will also make those soggy.
To solve this, you need to properly toss the salad. I usually use a big (no, bigger. Really) stainless steel bowl. Often takeout containers aren't large enough!!
Mix until every single piece of greens is thoroughly and evenly coated. And voila! Restaurant quality salad!
Now go eat your veggies!!! >:(
"Where did you learn all this"
- watched the cooking channel too much as a small child
- in the before times, I always tried to sit at the chef's counter so I could watch the kitchen staff and pick up new techniques
- desire to eat out less = upped game at home
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a nuclear take, so wearing my FOSS foundation ex-board member hat, let me take a stab at interpreting what's going on here, based on publicly available info.
Summary: the Rust Foundation is new and struggling to bootstrap. #3 in the QT isn't final.
The Rust Foundation is a 501(c)(6). This means it's a non-profit trade association. It differs from a public charity in that it only has to act in the best interests of its members, *not* the general public.
Many software nonprofits are c6's; this isn't unusual or nefarious.
Thread 𧡠of 501(c)(3) public charities you can support instead of the @fsf, if you care about its mission:
The Software Freedom Conservancy (@conservancy) provides a fiscal home for community-governed projects like git, sponsors @outreachy, and is the only organization doing GPL enforcement: sfconservancy.org/supporter/
I am real mad about the Elastic relicense so I'm going to vent a bit.
Say that I contributed some code to Elastic, under the original open source license. That license defines the terms of our engagement. Me: "hey I improved your code, can you include this fix so I and everyone can use it?" Elastic: "sure!"
They require a CLA, which assigns ownership of my fix to the project steward. The idealistic reason to do this is to protect the long-term health of the project: if copyright law gets totally rewritten, we can update the license to reflect our original intent!