Further Thoughts on Pantami’s Fake Professorship
Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami’s distressing professorial fraud is taking on multiple layers of soul-depressing duplicity. I’ll unpack some of them here.
After the unusualness of “promoting” Pantami, a FUTO non-employee, to an unworthy
“professorship” at FUTO was pointed out, his PR team went into overdrive to obfuscate, deflect, and muddy the waters by saying he was “appointed,” not “promoted” to his “professorship.” It’s one of the funniest and most unintelligent subterfuges I’ve encountered in recent times.
But here is the truth. Pantami’s PR firm called PRNNigeria put out a news release—at Pantami’s behest—to news organizations on September 5 saying he had been “promoted” to the rank of professor.guardian.ng/news/pantami-p…. The lead (i.e., the first sentence) of the news story reads:
“Nigeria’s Communications and Digital Economy minister Dr. Isa Ali Pantami has been PROMOTED to a Professor of Cyber Security.” The follow-up paragraph reads: “Pantami is among seven Readers (Associate Professors) elevated by the Governing Council of Federal university [sic] of
Technology Owerri (FUTO) at its 186th meeting.” I know for a fact that Pantami’s PR firm wrote the story because even the Guardian’s story of the “promotion” is a word-for-word reproduction of PR Nigeria’s story.prnigeria.com/2021/09/06/pan…. Plus, a journalist who was working on the
fraud of Pantami’s professorial promotion and who asked me for a perspective later told me he wouldn’t pursue the story further because when he reached out to Pantami’s PR man to get Pantami’s side of the story, the PR man told him he would get back to him but instead sent out a
press release blast to news media organizations announcing Pantami’s “promotion” to “professorship.” After the absurdity of “promoting” a non-employee to an unmerited “professorship” became apparent to Pantami and his PR team, they changed their propaganda and started to
aggressively push the deception that he was “appointed,” not “promoted.” But that’s a laughably unintelligent dissimulation. First, the press release clearly stated that “Pantami is among seven Readers (Associate Professors)” elevated to the rank of “professor.” But Pantami was
never a reader (or an associate professor) anywhere in the world. His last academic rank was assistant professor at the Islamic University, Madinah. And he had that rank for only 2 years. How can you elevate someone from something he never was to something he isn’t qualified for?
Second, even if we accept the fraudulent dissembling that he was “appointed” and not “promoted,” how do you appoint someone to a position that he does not perform? Let’s give an example with the diplomatic service. There are career ambassadors and there are political ambassadors.
Career ambassadors rise through the ranks, that is, are promoted to their position through the federal civil service. Political ambassadors are appointed to their positions without necessarily being employees in the diplomatic service. So let’s assume Pantami is the professorial
equivalent of a political ambassador. Even with the wildest stretch of idiotic fantasy, would it ever make any sense to have a Nigerian (political) ambassador to, say, China who isn’t at his duty post in Beijing but is instead a government minister in Abuja because he was
“appointed,” not “promoted” to his ambassadorship?In other words, if Pantami resigns his job as a minister and goes to FUTO that “appointed” him as a “professor,” this controversy won’t even exist. I’d be one of the first people to congratulate him for choosing academe over
politics and for being cosmopolitan enough to go teach at a university located in a geocultural zone other than his primordial one. The press release his PR firm put out said “the Minister as [sic] indicated that he would not receive remuneration because of his current position.”
Duh! It’s illegal for a minister to have another employment while serving as a minister, which, in fact, makes his “appointment” or “promotion” (take your pick!) to a “professorship” at FUTO a violation of federal law. Now, ask yourself: Why would a university appoint someone as
a professor and not tap from his well of knowledge, which caused him to be made a professor? When universities promote non-academics to professorship, they either request that they teach students there or conduct research using the university's affiliation (for increased
visibility and prestige).There has to be something in it for the university in terms of pedagogy & scholarship to appoint non-academics to professorship.The truth is that Pantami is just inordinately & impatiently hungry for a title that, in his mind, elevates him. Nothing more.
The evidence for that can be found in the fact that he has called himself a “professor” on his Facebook and Twitter profiles since at least 2016. I always wondered why. Now I know: it’s vulgar, scorn-worthy titular egotism. The same feverish desperation to be addressed as a
“professor” at all costs has now caused Pantami to suborn the VC of ATBU to write him a pitiful, embarrassingly error-ridden, scandalously inappropriate letter to “convey our heartfelt and warmest congratulations to you on your well-deserved appointment to the exalted rank of
Professor of Cybersecurity…” Poor Professor A.M. Abdulazeez! Only Allah knows the quantum of pressure they exerted on him to defy common decency and write that mortifying letter. Although I suspect that he didn’t write it on his own volition (he would be unworthy of his
professorship and position if he did), I still want to ask the ATBU VC why he didn’t appoint Pantami to a professorship at his university. After all, Pantami used to be a junior lecturer there. Why wait for him to perpetrate professorial fraud at FUTO before recognizing that he
is deserving of “the exalted rank of professorship”?The ATBU VC’s cringeworthy letter exemplifies the moral cowardice—and perhaps avaricious, 419 proclivity— that made FUTO’s VC to be susceptible to the fraud of conferring a duplicitous “professorship” on an egotistical,
title-hungry government minister who has not the remotest scholarly or pedagogical utility to his school. I weep for Nigeria!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Prof. Tukur Sa’ad’s Obfuscation on Pantami’s Professorial Fraud
Someone called my attention to a response to my interventions on Pantami’s FUTO professorial fraud. It was supposedly written by a certain Professor Sa’ad Tukur who identifies himself as “a former Vice Chancellor.”
The long and short of the article is that non-academics with industry experience can be appointed to professorships. Haven’t I written exactly that in all my interventions? Has the man even read my articles before writing his?Or is he just engaging in what logicians call strawman
argumentation, that is, inventing a weak or sham argument that your opponent didn’t make in order to easily refute it? But Sa’ad undermined his own “defense” of Pantami’s fraud by admitting that, “I’m not saying Pantami can fit into the examples I gave.” So, why did he write?
Isa Ali Pantami and the gang of unconscionably mercenary and dizzyingly shallow PR team around him seem to think that if they can get enough people to congratulate Pantami on his fraudulent professorial “promotion”
(or, if you will, "appointment") and say it is “well-deserved,” that it would somehow deodorize its overpoweringly malodorous ethical stench and perhaps even legitimize it.But it doesn’t work that way.Fraud is fraud irrespective of what the beneficiaries of fraud do to defend it.
Someone from Gombe shared with me this congratulatory letter on Pantami’s fraudulent “professorship” that the Gombe chapter of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) was instructed to write😂. I hope it’s a spoof because the atrociousness of the grammar in the letter is
5 Final Thoughts on Abba Kyari and Hushpuppi 1. As with everything Nigerian, the Abba Kyari/Hushpuppi fraud case has taken on a predictably ethnoreligious hue. I’ve read some people claim that Kyari is being targeted by America because he is a Muslim. Ha!Well, Hushpuppi is also a
Muslim. His full name is Ramon Olorunwa Abbas. Most Muslims will recognize Abbas as a Muslim name but probably not Ramon. Ramon is the Yoruba Muslim domestication of Abdulrahman. Read my July 13, 2014 column titled “Top 10 Yoruba Names You Never Guessed Were Arabic Names" to
understand how Abdulrahman became Ramon (which is also sometimes rendered as Ramonu or Raymond). The name is #7 on my list. farooqkperogi.com/2014/07/top-10… Kyari’s replacement, announced earlier today, is a Tunji Disu, another Muslim. Disu is the Yoruba Muslim domestication of Idris.
Used to Think “Bianca” and “Biafra” Were Igbo Words!
Don’t laugh too hard at my ignorance, but until fairly recently, I used to think Bianca was an Igbo name and thought any non-Igbo person who bore the name did so out of (benign) appellative appropriation—such as many Black
Americans who bear African names. Don’t blame me: the first person I ever knew to bear the name was Bianca Onuh Ojukwu, the former beauty queen who became former Biafra warlord Emeka Ojukwu’s wife. Through the logic of false attraction, I thought the “bia” in Bianca was derived
from the Igbo “bia” that means “come.” This notion was congealed in my mind because “bia” is probably Igbo language’s single most recognized word to other non-Igbo Nigerians. “Bia” is lexically frozen in my imagination in the trinitarian alternative indigenous name for Nigeria
False Dichotomy Between an App and a Country
A pro-regime apologist said he’d rather lose an app (i.e., Twitter) than lose a country. Nonsense! That’s called a false dilemma (or a false dichotomy) in logic. A false dilemma imposes an unnatural and deceptive limit on options. You
can have both an app and a country—like many countries do. You can lose a country without an app—such as Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, etc. And you can simultaneously lose an app and a country, such as Buhari’s Nigeria seems pigheadedly moving towards. But if your country’s fabric
is so brittle that it can be dismantled by the mere dissident chatter of disaffected citizens on an app, then you have no country to lose in the first place. If you really want a country, go do some work to have one so that mere insurgent chatter on an app can’t undo it. Start
You Can Ban Twitter, But You Can’t Ban Rebellion Against Injustice
You can ban Twitter, or even the Internet, but you can't ban the righteous emotions that injustice animates. Or the rage and angst that people ventilate on social media as a consequence of injustice. Only justice,
equity, tact, respect, good governance, etc. can ban them. Nigeria isn’t dysfunctional and insecure because of social media; it is dysfunctional, insecure, and tottering perilously on the brink of the precipice because of the incompetence, irresponsibility, & intolerance of the
Buhari regime, easily the vilest and most insular regime in Nigeria’s entire history. There was no Twitter when Nigerians fought totalitarian military juntas to a standstill. There was no social media or even mobile telephony when Nigerians organized and resisted the cancelation