After doing a year of required courses at Harvard, this semester I am taking a mix of courses that interest me most. In my readings, so many interesting ideas and stories come up that are relevant to @AamAadmiParty's politics in particular and Indian politics in general.
I am going to use this thread to document some of that, so that AAP volunteers like myself (and others) can also benefit from it. Finding time to read when working on the ground is very hard. Hopefully, this thread can distill interesting ideas in consumable form!
Amartya Sen, in 'Development as Freedom' articulates which factors lead to "development", of which social opportunities is a big one. He notes how investment in health & edu in Japan led to fast growth. @ArvindKejriwal often quotes the Japan example to articulate the Delhi model.
Found this accurate articulation of @AamAadmiParty's ideological commitment to education.
- Education is redistributive
- Education promotes meritocracy
- Best interest of elites (Cong-BJP) is to block education spending
From Ben Ansell's "From the Ballot to the Blackboard"
Fascinating paper on the role of democracy in Uganda's move to primary education in 1996.
Universal primary education became a reality in the country after it was promised in an election manifesto by a political leader, and after he won, he delivered on the promise 1/n
It continues: Mere existence of a democracy is not enough to increase spending on education. It must be a competitive democracy, where players face significant challenges to their power from Opposition groups. 2/n
A big takeaway from this paper is:
If a party makes election an issue and becomes a competitive player in that election, no matter the outcome of the election, education spending is likely to go up. 3/n
Most importantly, it goes to AAP's potential role in improving spending on education across the country.
In the 2022 assembly election, the fact that AAP has made education a core electoral issue and has become a competitive force in most states is great news for education. 4/4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
MyAxis had 500 surveyors, 7.5 L voters, with each interview lasting a minimum of 10 mins per their own explainer. So each surveyor interviewed 1500 voters, for 250 hours over 40 days, excl time to find respondents! 1/n
Assuming it took 5 mins to find each respondent, it means an additional 125 hours. Add to this travel time btwn constituencies/states from phase to phase and the number of man-hours needed can go up a lot, but efficient management can reduce that so let's ignore it. 2/n
In my limited experience, I can tell you that the self-proclaimed level of rigorous surveying in the time frame is next to impossible. The scale, counter-intuitively, makes the survey prone to mass fake reporting by stretched field teams, possibly underpaid, to meet targets 3/n
During Karan Thapar's Wire Dialogues interview, Guha had called the comparison of today's times with the Emergency "phony", because otherwise "we wouldn't be having this conversation in Delhi".
The liberal elite doesn't get it: they're not the threat to the fascists!
Chandrashekhar Azad of the Bhim Army was a threat, and he's been locked up for months now.
The Bhima Koregaon activists were a threat and they're still in jail.