Any organisation considering whether they should stay in the @stonewalluk schemes should consider that they are not in line with the @EHRC employers code of practice.
Why take the risk of signing up to a scheme that is different from the law?
Stonewall tells employers to "acknowledge the limitations of the Equality Act (2010)"
It advises against using language based on compliance with the law saying this is "outdated" and may "cause offence"
Ignore what the law says about protected characteristics says Stonewall guidance
"Gender Identity" and "Gender Expression" are treated as protected characteristics.
They are not.
"Best practice" monitoring is not in line with GDPR or Equality Act
Ignores sex, substitute gender identity
And more confusion and conflation of protected characteristics...
The EHRC said specifically in AEA v EHRC that this is not right.
It can be a proportionate means to a legitimate aim to have facilities which are *single sex* and which do not include people on the basis of gender identity.
No consideration of what this policy means for inclusion of women and girls, including those from faith groups.
"High barrier of proof"... this does not come from the Equality Act.
The Equality Act says circumstances where "a person of one sex might reasonably object to the presence of a person of the opposite sex".
Organisations should take care to comply with the Equality Act... all 9 protected characteristics.
Stonewall guidance does not help them do this and puts them at risk of facing discrimination and harassment claims in relation to other protected characteristics
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Sex Matters team spent last weekend at the Battle of Ideas in London.
The festival of public debate included around 100 lively discussions on big issues in politics, science, economics, culture, the law and more. Panels that touched on sex-based rights took place alongside sessions on riots, China, AI, cities, prisons, art, energy and education.
Fiona spoke on “Gender Wars: no end in sight?” about how women's rights that have been won in our lifetime are being lost.
Last weekend I attended the Bigger Picture conference held by @genspect in Lisbon.
It was Genspect’s third conference in under 18 months – a remarkable achievement for a small, newish organisation and another step towards fighting back against the “gender affirming” model of healthcare for trans-identifying people…
…according to which everyone, including children, has an innate gender identity and it’s the job of doctors and therapists to provide puberty-blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries to bring their bodies into line.
The draft DfE guidance says “Allow for watchful waiting: Wait for a period of time before considering a request, to ensure it is a sustained and properly thought through decision. This period of ‘watchful waiting’ may help to ensure unnecessary action is not undertaken.”
But as the @ASCL_UK says “Our members are not clinical experts, and should not be expected to possess or exercise clinical expertise.”
Over the past few weeks (even while Sex Matters was closed for a much-needed summer break!) we have been busy with the fallout from the scandal of male boxers in the women’s Olympic boxing.
With Emma Hilton, and the rest of the team, I have been doing interviews, media briefings…
…and podcasts to explain what was going on and why.
Last year, while I was on a summer holiday, I was emailed by the Metropolitan Police and told I was under investigation for the crime of “Malicious Communications”. Now I’ve been told that the case has been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service…
My crime was to tweet about a male doctor who was presented to patients as a woman and allowed to examine them without their informed consent.
This week the awful spectacle at the Olympics goes on. The IOC has allowed two athletes, found to have XY chromosomes (most likely with a disorder of sexual development which led to their being recorded female at birth by mistake) to compete against women in boxing.
Today we ran a briefing on the facts and science behind the women’s boxing row at the #Olympics
Thanks to @DerryBanShee, @FondOfBeetles, @mara_yamauchi & @sharrond62 for speaking.
The full video is now available on our YouTube ⬇️
@DerryBanShee @FondOfBeetles @mara_yamauchi @sharrond62 Male advantage over females in sport is huge. You can see it in the Mixed 4 x 400 relay at the 2019 athletics World Championships – watch the best women in the world be overtaken easily. That’s male advantage.
@DerryBanShee @FondOfBeetles @mara_yamauchi @sharrond62 In this year’s GB marathon trials the men and women started together. They were about to run for more than two hours – but all the men were ahead of all the women after 46 seconds.