1/ Nitty gritty workflow management tips for academically minded folks.
2/ Background: Last week, I explained how to build an academic career without going bananas. This week, I'll give a few "micro tips" about workflow. As usual, take with a grain of salt - nothing works for everyone.
3/ Tip #1: Every two months or so, I make a google doc with a name like "Stuff to do in June 2021." And I mercilessly list all activities from the smallest to the biggest.
4/ Within that list, I then categorize into 4 groups: research, teaching, admin, and "extra curricular."
5/ Then, within each group I may have subgroups. For research, I have categories for complete papers that are under review, rejected, or revision. Then, "working on it" and then just "ideas."
6/ Teaching is similar - I group things that need to be done by course. Could be big (new course) or small (print a few quizzes). The same for admin and ExCur activities.
7/ Then - and this is important - I guestimate time budgets for each. Is this a 30 minute job (write a quiz and print), a whole day job (read a tenure file), or more?
8/ Then, I can now have a somewhat reasonable estimate of what I can actually do and on what time scale. Big tasks that take more then a day get notes about breaking up into subtasks.
8/ By doing this prioritizing and time budget, two things happen - emotional control (I can turn big projects into easier to digest small steps) and coordination with other folks.
9/ Another big issue is to have rules about how much time you spend on particular tasks. Younger academics have trouble with this, but when you get older you should really know how much you need for things like letters of rec, exam/lecture prep, etc.
10/ A concrete example - letters of recommendation. The student who has done ok, but not amazing, and is shooting for a median law school, may get about 30 minutes on a letter. Up for tenure? I will spend hours reading your material and writing the letter.
11/ Another concrete example - course prep. If it's a large lecture that I have done before, weekly prep might be just reviewing the notes and activating online tests/quizzes. I can do that very quickly. For a new course, I might spend an hour just *thinking* about the syllabus.
12/ I also love the "one touch rule" - unless it's super high stakes, I don't endlessly redo work. E.g., I may sit down and take an hour to write an exam, but I'm done, minus small corrections.
13/ I also have saying no/intake management rules. For example, with journal article review, I have "the rule of three," I accept 3 papers and than tell new requests to wait a few months while I process those. If the paper still needs review then, I can help.
13/ Also, I apply a similar rule for service requests. I accept many requests, but when I "fill up," I politely, and truthfully, say - "thanks, but I am already on committees X and Y, and I'm out of time."
14/ People think, I am "short changing" my colleagues or students or that I am shifting the burden. Not at all! But being smart with time, I can really focus on the core of the job - teaching students and research.
15/ Another bonus is that when a time intensive issue arises (e.g., student needs in depth discussion or a thorny research problem), I actually have time because I haven't committed to 8 journal reviews or I spent 12 hours writing a single exam.
16/ Bottom line: These rules don't work for everyone, but you can have a more rational and productive workflow if you spend time on organizations and time management that makes sense for you.
9/ Another big issue is to have rules about how much time you spend on particular tasks. Younger academics have trouble with this, but when you get older you should really know how much you need for things like letters of rec, exam/lecture prep, etc.
10/ A concrete example - letters of recommendation. The student who has done ok, but not amazing, and is shooting for a median law school, may get about 30 minutes on a letter. Up for tenure? I will spend hours reading your material and writing the letter.
11/ Another concrete example - course prep. If it's a large lecture that I have done before, weekly prep might be just reviewing the notes and activating online tests/quizzes. I can do that very quickly. For a new course, I might spend an hour just *thinking* about the syllabus.
12/ I also love the "one touch rule" - unless it's super high stakes, I don't endlessly redo work. E.g., I may sit down and take an hour to write an exam, but I'm done, minus small corrections.
13/ Also, I apply a similar rule for service requests. I accept many requests, but when I "fill up," I politely, and truthfully, say - "thanks, but I am already on committees X and Y, and I'm out of time."
14/ People think, I am "short changing" my colleagues or students or that I am shifting the burden. Not at all! But being smart with time, I can really focus on the core of the job - teaching students and research.
15/ Another bonus is that when a time intensive issue arises (e.g., student needs in depth discussion or a thorny research problem), I actually have time because I haven't committed to 8 journal reviews or I spent 12 hours writing a single exam.
16/ Bottom line: These rules don't work for everyone, but you can have a more rational and productive workflow if you spend time on organizations and time management that makes sense for you.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fabio Rojas

Fabio Rojas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fabiorojas

10 Sep
1/ How to be productive and not insane. Comments: on sustaining scholarly work over the long run.
2/ Background: Last year, a student at pro-seminar asked how I was to have such a healthy CV. Here is my answer.
3/ First, the size of the CV is partially an artifact of age. If you hang in there and keep at it, the CV just grows with all kinds of items.
Read 14 tweets
30 Jun
1/ Why I am a deep peer review skeptic, even though I'm a journal editor and my articles (sometimes!) make it through peer reviews.
2/ Background: @khberglund drew my attention to this article that reviews problems with peer review. And they are many! Let me tell you about them... elemental.medium.com/amp/p/1d58e5d9…
3/ Perhaps the most fundamental problem is that peer review is not reliable in the sense that peer reviews are weakly correlated with each other. A famous study by Peters and Ceci is a great example...
Read 10 tweets
10 Feb
1/ Why is "framing" and lit review so contentious in sociology? A thread for #soctwitter and assorted bystanders.
2/ Last week, our department had a very nice panel where faculty answered questions publishing. Panel included current/former editors/deputy editors of ASR, AJS, Contexts, Soc of Ed, SPQ and more. (Yes, our dept is super professional and service oriented).
3/ Most advice was simple and intuitive: keep revising, show your work, read the journal you submit to, take rejection in stride, accept the randomness of reviews, etc. BUT the discussion of framing and lit review was long and complex.
Read 11 tweets
9 Feb
1/ #Impeachment: a failed Constitutional design. Some basic data shows it doesn't do its job. (retweet w/edits)
2/ The US has had 46 presidents, 49 VPS, 115 Supreme court justices, hundreds of senators and cabinet members and federal judges, and thousands of Representatives. How many impeachments? Keep reading to find out!
Answer: The US House info website lists a paltry 21 impeachements, 8 convictions, and 3 resigned... over 245 years! Impeachment might as well not exist. history.house.gov/Institution/Im…
Read 8 tweets
9 Feb
1/ #Impreachment: a failed Constitutional design. Some basic data shows it doesn't do its job.
2/ The US has had 46 presidents, 49 VPS, 115 Supreme court justices, hundreds of senators and cabinet members and federal judges, and thousands of Representatives. How many impeachments?
3/ Answer: The US House info website lists a paltry 21 impeachements, 8 convictions, and 3 resigned. history.house.gov/Institution/Im…
Read 9 tweets
8 Feb
1/ Do you like the idea of teaching social theory instead of intellectual history? If you do, assign my book and I will do the following things for you... amazon.com/Theory-Working…
2/ A free signed copy, while supplies last Image
3/ I will give you my syllabus and lecture notes, both undergrad and grad level.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(