A last thread on the last day of voting in the #WGAE election:
First, if you are a member of our union and you have not exercised your franchise, do vote today. But I'm actually going to here eschew any last appeal for my ticket or any critique of the opposition.
Instead...
...I'm going to deliver a shard of wisdom for which I have to credit Bernard Simon, who on many occasions managed to hold back when his hot-headed progeny was ready to war.
"What do you do when you have a guy in the corner," he once asked me when I did have a guy in the corner.
"You let him out."
The fact is, I have no clue who has who in the corner in this election. The faction arguing for WGAE to become an industrial union of writers in all sectors is mobilized and effective. My own ticket, those arguing that the WGAE can't be sustained...
...as an amalgamated umbrella when the larger WGAW offers screen and television writers an inevitable home if and when the East Coast unit ceases to speak explicitly and comprehensively for their interests has also waged an aggressive campaign.
When the votes are counted, one side or the other may delight themselves with the notion that the election has settled the problem.
But either way that will be bullshit.
Either way, the same essential process will have to begin. Either way, the same inevitable...
....outcome will need to be reached and it will involve both sides going into the same room and negotiating toward the same elemental outcome. If our opponents are successful in this election and think that...
...the victory has delivered an amalgamated and solvent WGAE, they're walking a bad road. And if my ticket is successful and we think for a minute that we are not still required to subsidize and support a future of...
...organizing of writers in other, more vulnerable sectors -- and that the failure to do so will not waste five years of effective unionizing that has benefitted all writers, then shame on us.
With either outcome tonight, the same two factions are going to have to go into the same room and cobble together the same solution: In order for the WGAE to survive, freelance and TV writers are going to have to be assured that their leadership will be...
...heard and seriously regarded by the much larger WGAW, that they are contributing to a union that provides the same support of their fundamental interests as they might receive if they simply enrolled in the West. Certainly, the WGAW has historically...
...seen little sense in the maintenance of a separate East Coast unit of film and TV screenwriters; their argument that there should be a single WGA will be renewed -- and heeded -- once the East Coast contingent finds itself in a minority within its own unit.
And from the other perspective, it is entirely intolerable for digital journalists and other members in other writing sectors to find themselves circumscribed in their union, to see the continued organizing of their sectors impeded or restrained. They need a full-throated union..
...speaking for them as well. More than that, as that organizing continues, those members need to be assured that the resources of the WGAE -- which began this campaign in earnest -- remain committed to the task at hand, that we not quit what we started. The argument that all...
...those who lift a pen anywhere are part and parcel of the same industry is lofty sloganeering, but untrue. I work in an industry with members of SAG, the DGA, IATSE and the Teamsters who share more of my absolute interests than digital journalists. But...
...the argument that writers can move from one industry to another, and that all scribblers benefit when every sector in which our craft engages is unionized, holds a hell of a lot of water. What the WGAE started needs to be finished.
To address both realities, the same two sides -- whoever wins, and whoever loses tonight -- will need to get into a room, shoulder by shoulder, and achieve either a new bifurcated governing structure so that the WGAE can continue to speak for screen, TV and radio scriptwriters...
...with the same authority and aggressiveness as it has for its history -- and be heard not only by the studios and networks, but by its larger sister union. And digital members need to know the new structure provides a home under which they can continue...
...to organize aggressively and saturate their sectors. And both sides need to emerge with the confidence that the new construct will hold and keep the East solvent. The only viable alternative is to spin the digital units into a separate union entirely -- but to do so with...
...guarantees of subsidy and support that assure the survival of the new entity and its ability to grow. And with either solution, the WGAE needs to be talking to the NewsGuild about a plan to actually organize that which we claim is organized labor.
Digital journalists -- especially those who write prose -- are in fact the essential future of the NewsGuild. No one is going to cutting down trees and throwing them on doorsteps for much longer. We should have been talking to the NG five years ago; we need to start.
The point is that either side, emerging victorious, will still have to confront the same forces in play, the same realities that come with that victory. In the end, we are all going to be in the same room, staring at the same problems, requiring the same challenges.
Tonight, when they count the votes, some of your brothers and sisters in this union are going to feel cornered. The trick is to let them out -- and then do the same thing you will have to do regardless: Talk.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Are you still poking your ass out after delivering your last fart into high wind? Well then, let's move on to the small shard of substance you somehow contradicts any fucking thing in th thread to which you attempted to respond. So, put down that crush porn mag and pay attention:
Your claimed insight is that I am clueless that informant information, cooperating witnesses and a general willingness of the populace to help police address the violence is elemental to solving crime. You do this to suggest that the problem in Baltimore is not the drug war...
...as I assert, but rather that the folks being policed are to blame because they won't assist the police in protecting them. That was your blurted attempt at argument in sum. Except, yeah, you forgot who I was and that I spent a year in the homicide unit to write a book and...
You clueless wonder. They reached a breaking point because the BPD cannot solve violent crimes and arrest those offenders in meaningful numbers. Why? Because we trained the last three generations of cops to make horseshit drug stats and not to do essential police work...
Baltimore is a city in which we spent decades drug warring and mass incarcerating our way to a 350-percent increase in drug arrests while the clearance rates for murder, rape, robbery, and agg assaults collapsed by more than 50 percent. Why? Because we lost ourselves...
...clearing corners and throwing everybody into jail wagons and promoting and paying the cops doing that bullshit. Meanwhile, sergeants and lieutenants couldn't train a squad to retroactively solve a crime or properly protect a post to save their fucking lives...
Thread: Grand and bittersweet that Baltimore now has the full answer to one of its most quaint and enduring crime mysteries. Christine Tkacik did the best thing a reporter can do. She went back to ask again, and finally, for the family, it was time. news.yahoo.com/baltimore-bloc…
2) Salsbury's whereabouts were a source of fascination if you were a police reporter in Baltimore and in the 1980s and early 1990s, I bought drinks now and then and tried to stay friendly with Pam Gail, his former girlfriend and ex-burlesque queen. Salisbury left her...
3) ...the Oasis Club and Ms. Gail always claimed that she had no idea where Salsbury was, but I thought she gave away something when she went out of her way to tell me that Salsbury's ex-wife was a fine lady and that if I had any conscience, I would leave her and Salsbury's..
Short thread:
Interesting. Netanyahu's confidence and bluster in stiff-arming any two-state solution to the Palestinian question was predicated on Israel's emergence as the first "Jewish-Sunni" state -- a backchannel alliance with the Saudis and Egypt against Iran...
...in which SA, Egypt and the Gulf States were willing to de-emphasize the Palestinian cause while Israel delivered for them as a bulwark against Iran. With the Sunni flank secured, Netanyahu could bluster and middle-finger and settlement-build as if he was playing...
...the long game. But that requires a few things to continue: 1) The Shia-Sunni divide isn't ever pacfied or bridged. 2) The U.S. continues to go all-in on combatively engaging Iran and giving the Saudis no reason to stand down or compromise with Iran. And 3)...
1) Thought we could just let this empty-suit, grifting, self-absorbed sociopath ooze into oblivion, but no, the bloated mook keeps blurting out horseshit to whatever lickspittle will take his calls. So, to wit, it's time to put this vaccine miracle narrative to rest. To wit:
2) The real reason that the U.S. and other nations achieved these vaccines at such seemingly astonishing speed has fuck-all to do with Trump or Biden or political parties. The fundamental advantage that medical science had upon the arrival of COVID19 is simply the fact...
3) ...that medical researchers had been hard at work studying the SARS-family viral genome ever since the appearance of it years ago, so that when this variant appeared, the research was already well on the way to identifying its every characteristic and vulnerability...
A thread on the legislation that would repeal the Police Bill of Rights in Maryland, why Governor Larry Hogan is no defender of good and honorable police work when he attempts to veto that legislation, and why the General Assembly should override the veto:
First, and this is based on an observed year inside the Baltimore Police Department's homicide unit and about two decades of covering the issue in that city: Even without the advantage of the existing Bill of RIghts, law enrforcement officers....
...operate with two incredible advantages in any attempt by the public to regulate or oversee their use of force against citizens. The first and greatest advantage is the legal hole -- so large you can drive a jail van through it and not scrape a lawyer on either side --