Ten reasons why #TheTimeIsNow for the UN to recognize that everyone, everywhere, has the right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment (R2HE)
#1--more than 80% of UN member states (155+ out of 193) already recognize this right via regional treaties, constitutions, or legislation, from Argentina to Zambia
#2--A rights-based approach, including R2HE, can equitably & effectively address the global environmental crisis--the climate emergency, biodiversity collapse, pervasive pollution & emerging infectious diseases spilling over from wildlife and livestock into people, like COVID-19
#3--Evidence demonstrates that the R2HE sparks stronger environmental laws & policies, improved implementation & enforcement of those policies, greater public participation & most importantly, improved environmental outcomes—cleaner air, safer water, lower carbon emissions & more
#4—The right to a healthy environment is vital to vulnerable & marginalized populations suffering disproportionate impacts from environmental degradation, climate change, toxic exposure, & lack of access to clean air, safe water & healthy food. Women, children, minorities ...
#5--Air pollution kills more than 7 million people every year, including hundreds of thousands of children under the age of five. The right to a safe, clean, healthy & sustainable environment can spark action to improve air quality, preventing premature deaths
#6--The climate crisis is a human rights crisis, as I’ve learned through conversations with children in Fiji, Indigenous people in Norway, pastoralists in Kenya, & young people throughout the world who fear for their future. Rights-based solutions exist & must be implemented ASAP
#7--The global water crisis affects billions of people through unsafe drinking water, insufficient quantities of water for daily life, and damage to aquatic ecosystems.
#8—the right to food and the right to a healthy environment are closely related, and must be implemented to transform the world’s food systems, which are currently causing $20 trillion (not a typo) in health and environmental costs every year
#9—All human rights depend on a healthy biosphere! As the IPBES report made clear, biodiversity is declining rapidly across the planet, with 1 million species at risk of extinction. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights said the R2HE is uniquely capable of protecting nature
#10—The UN’s first Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, Fatmah Zohrah Ksentini, urged recognition of the R2HE way back in 1994. Twenty-seven years later, #TheTimeIsNow. As Dr. Martin Luther King said, “the time is always right to do what is right!”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Landmark Inter-American Court decision on right to a healthy environment in La Oroya v Peru
“Environmental degradation can cause irreparable damage to human beings, which is why a healthy environment is a fundamental right for the existence of humanity.” corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/art…
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights handed down a landmark decision on Friday, March 22, in a case involving allegations that more than a century of catastrophic industrial pollution from La Oroya Metallurgical Complex in Peru violated the right to a healthy environment.
Generations of people in the community were poisoned by lead, arsenic and other toxic substances, resulting in a devastating array of physical and mental illnesses and in some cases, death. Children in particular suffered irreversible developmental damage.
Disappointing news from the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in cases brought by 16 young people from across the world against five nations for violating their rights through inadequate climate action.
Cases rejected because the youths did not go to national courts first.
Other aspects of the cases are more positive from a legal perspective. The Committee found that it had jurisdiction to determine the cases because States are responsible for regulating emissions from their territory that harm children's rights.
“Emitting States are responsible for the negative impact of the emissions originating in their territory on the rights of children – even those children who may be located abroad,” said Committee member Ann Skelton