A thread about transitory vs persistent inflation and why persistent might be actually be winning.
This comes from @economics And it breaks down CPI by reopening and non-reopening components.
Of the 5.25% inflation rate in the last year, only 1.62% was reopening components.
1/6
Breaking it down for August we find that reopening CPI components (or transitory inflation) FELL by 0.22% while CPI non-reopening components (or persistent inflation) ROSE by 0.35%
2/6
Detailing this we find that CPI non-reopening (persistent) components are surging to its highest monthly level since at least 2016.
Restated, this series of persistent inflation is trending higher, and is 78% of overall CPI.
3/6
The CPI reopening components (transitory) fell by the most since the lockdown.
Restated, this series of transitory inflation is falling and is just 14% of overall CPI.
4/6
So, why are the CPI reopening components falling? Is the Delta variant hurting the economy and sapping demand?
Consider these two charts.
Airline ticket prices collapsed by 9% annualized in August. Why? Because demand is also collapsing as measured by the TSA?
5/6
In sum transitory components are falling and their demand is off as Delta is hurting economic activity.
Meanwhile persistent inflation components are surging higher and higher.
Is this why stocks turnaround today? Weakening demand and higher inflation squeezing margins?
6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Polymarket recession odds peaked at 65% on May 1st, the April ISM release date, suggesting Liberation Day and the 20% stock market correction did not damage the economy, as the "soft data" warned.
Subsequent April data confirmed this.
Will May see more of the same?
🧵
2/12
The prevailing narrative in the market for months has been that the labor market is going to fall apart, forcing the Fed to cut rates.
This has not happened, and so far, the "soft" (survey) data have been wildly off in predicting the economy.
3/12
ISM Employment upticked in May from April. The first monthly "May" data point suggests the labor market is still not weakening.
See the red line on the right. With increased tariffs (red line to the left), the prices of goods originating from China are increasing rapidly.
Also note that the Chinese-originated price rise (red line to the right) began around May 1st, the same time truflation started its upward march.
3/5
From the FT:
The Yale Budget Lab says the average US family would pay $2,800 more for the same basket of products purchased last year, should tariffs remain at their current level, with lower-income homes more exposed.
Chinese products being sold in the US have already seen marked increases in retail prices, according to analysis of high-frequency data from PriceStats by Alberto Cavallo of Harvard Business School.
ISM was released this morning, marking the first monthly data point since Liberation Day.
It beat expectations and is not giving indications that manufacturers "froze" or "hit a wall" post Liberation Day.
--
*US APRIL ISM MANUFACTURING INDEX FALLS TO 48.7; EST. 47.9
2/9
It is consistent with decent NON-TARIFF growth.
3/9
Why did bonds not like it (yields moved higher)? Maybe prices paid (tariffs?)