A thread about transitory vs persistent inflation and why persistent might be actually be winning.
This comes from @economics And it breaks down CPI by reopening and non-reopening components.
Of the 5.25% inflation rate in the last year, only 1.62% was reopening components.
1/6
Breaking it down for August we find that reopening CPI components (or transitory inflation) FELL by 0.22% while CPI non-reopening components (or persistent inflation) ROSE by 0.35%
2/6
Detailing this we find that CPI non-reopening (persistent) components are surging to its highest monthly level since at least 2016.
Restated, this series of persistent inflation is trending higher, and is 78% of overall CPI.
3/6
The CPI reopening components (transitory) fell by the most since the lockdown.
Restated, this series of transitory inflation is falling and is just 14% of overall CPI.
4/6
So, why are the CPI reopening components falling? Is the Delta variant hurting the economy and sapping demand?
Consider these two charts.
Airline ticket prices collapsed by 9% annualized in August. Why? Because demand is also collapsing as measured by the TSA?
5/6
In sum transitory components are falling and their demand is off as Delta is hurting economic activity.
Meanwhile persistent inflation components are surging higher and higher.
Is this why stocks turnaround today? Weakening demand and higher inflation squeezing margins?
6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As this chart shows, the current BTC price is the average purchase price of the Spot BTC ETF buyers. ~$57K to ~$58K
2/6
So, about $37 billion in Spot BTC assets (x-GBTC) now have no profits and maybe a small loss.
3/6
As I have been detailing, the 13F shows very little institutional buying of these ETFs. 95+% of the buyers are either hedge funds, institutional investors holding less than $100m, or retail degens.
It confirms my fear that the Spot BTC ETFs are effectively "orange FOMO poker chips" for paper-handed small-time traders (degens).
These degens are getting close to their breakeven, which could turn them in big-time sellers.
Let's dig in.
3/11
A Citi study shows that investment advisors (IAs) hold ~35% of all ETFs. The table shows the 4 largest BTC ETFs. IA's (blue ribbon) hold less than 1% of the New BTC ETFs.
For comparison, see the two popular non-equity ETFs, GLD and TLT. IAs hold 22% of HYG and 40% of TLT.
The deficit as a % of GDP (bottom), now 5.93%, is higher than in any period except the Great Recession (2007 - 2009) and the 2020 COVID shutdown (dotted line).
The government is borrowing to spend money like the economy is trying to recover from a recession.
2/6
This separates Federal revenues (orange) and spending (blue).
The difference is the deficit (middle panel).
The bottom panel (black) shows that taxes only cover 73% of federal spending. The other 27% has to be borrowed.
3/6
Yearly federal spending is $6.24 trillion or 22.3% of the US economy (or nominal GDP).
Like the deficit chart above, the only time the government has spent this much as a % of GDP is when trying to get the economy out of a recession.
The 13Fs are a disappointment. Very little wealth manager adoption so far (like 1%).
Unrealized gains are shrinking fast.
Why I've been skeptical of Spot BTC ETFs.
2/7
* March 11 = only $1B inflow day.
* March 12 = Brokerage report saying $220B of inflows over the next 3 years (effectively predicting constant inflows, forever).
* March 13, all-time high close (5PM ET price)
Since the mid-March frenzy, inflows peaked (top panel).
3/7
The 3/31 13Fs are coming out, and they are disappointing for those who thought a big boomer wave of buying BTC ETFs through wealth managers was underway. Only odd lots.
IBIT has only 27 13Fs with more than 10,000 IBIT shares (~$360k), way less than 1% of outstanding shares.