Well, this is a fun detail I didn't notice in the order before:

4.) The City Respondents and County Auditor are enjoined from publicly releasing results tapes or copies of results tapes from individual machines.
For those not in the know on this (I have served as an election judge for several years), the "results tapes" are printed out by the ballot tabulators on and show the results on each item on the ballot by race, for that precinct.
Three copies of the results tape are printed. One of these is the "zero tape." At the beginning of the day, there is a results tape showing the results for the tabulator at that point (zero votes for everything since no votes are cast yet - hence the name).
The final results are printed on the same roll of paper, three times. The first set is kept along with the zero tape, so there is an unbroken piece of paper showing the zero votes at the beginning of the day and the final votes at the end of the day.
The other two copies are cut and separated. One of the copies is posted in the polling place for public viewing. Sometimes someone (usually the media) will stop by to view this copy of the results tape. The result tapes go to Election HQ at the end of the night.
The apparent intent of the order is to make sure to close all loopholes and try to make sure there is no way anyone can find out the votes cast on this ballot question. Unfortunately, it also prevents public viewing of the results tape in general for the election.
This undermines what is intended as a transparency provision in the law to ensure public confidence in our elections.

News organizations should be intervening to challenge this aspect of the order, at a minimum, since it interferes with their ability to report on the election.
In addition, if news organizations have any guts they'll do exit polling outside polling places and ask people how they would have voted on the public safety ballot question if they could have.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Josh Martin

Josh Martin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoshMartinMpls

15 Sep
Following the Rules to Amend the Charter: An Act in 8,000 Parts 🧵

May 25, 2020 - George Floyd is murdered by Derek Chauvin, an on-duty Minneapolis police officer.
May/June 2020 – Massive protests occur in reaction to the murder by police, as well as in reaction to the treatment of protesters and the media by police.

June 7, 2020 – The rally in Powderhorn Park occurs, in which nine council members commit to transformational change of MPD.
June 26, 2020 – City Council refers the amendment to create a Department of Public Safety to the Charter Commission.

July 1, 2020 – The Charter Commission holds its first meeting on the amendment. Some commissioners already hint at a desire to run out the clock.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!