The Federal Trade Commission's open meeting is starting in 10 minutes. Get ready for angry pro-monopoly Republican commissioners who will try to explain why their opposition to investigating monopolies shows Lina Khan is partisan or something.
Now @chopraftc is attacking the longstanding practice of the FTC giving interpretive letters to firms to let them sidestep merger reporting requirements, like letting them not count debt when considering the size of acquisitions for reporting purposes.
Finally comes Lina Khan's motion to withdraw the lax 2020 vertical merger guidelines, which allow firms to merge based on speculative theories about efficiencies, and based on the false notion that such mergers allow lower consumer prices.
Oh that's interesting. Republican FTC Commissioner @CSWilsonFTC approvingly cites the Obama judge who dismissed the Facebook antitrust suit originally brought by Trump. It's fascinating how it's the GOP commissioners who opposed breaking up Facebook.
FTC Commissioner @chopraftc is talking about vertical mergers and the crisis of shortages in the economy. "Unfortunately merger analysis has come to focus on efficiencies. No one wants to be inefficient. But... this means cost-cutting to reduce productive capacity."
"Perhaps its raw materials are wedged in the Suez Canal." - @chopraftc
Someone in government gets it!
"We cannot ignore situations where firms in many sectors are becoming too big to fail and their short-term rationalization and cost-cutting leads to systemic risk and shortages." - FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra
🔥🔥🔥
Republican FTC Commissioner @FTCPhillips is praising Disney's consolidation of the film industry. "If you watched a Pixar film during the pandemic, you benefitted from a vertical merger." Noah Phillips should start the club Republicans for Big Hollywood...
The best part of the FTC hearings is always when the public gets to talk. So far we've heard from pharmacists, supply chain experts, franchisees, and diabetes patients.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's my stab at trying to explain why there are shortages everywhere. Basically a monopolist is a business model based on bottlenecking something, so to the extent you encourage monopolization, you get shortages. mattstoller.substack.com/p/counterfeit-…
The number one problem small business mention these days is shortages, either labor or product. The Fed's Beige Book two days ago mentioned shortage 80 times. This is a huge unstated political problem. mattstoller.substack.com/p/counterfeit-…
I've gotten a lot of feedback from consumers, business people and various workers on shortages they are seeing, and that info is super helpful. I've set up a form where you can share what you're seeing or or experiencing re: shortages. docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI…
1. I want to put something on the table for conservatives who fear big tech. The FTC just refiled an antitrust suit against Facebook to break up the company, and both Republicans on the commission - @FTCPhillips and @CSWilsonFTC -VOTED AGAINST IT. mattstoller.substack.com/p/lina-khan-le…
3. The GOP is split. GOP leaders Jim Jordan, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Kevin McCarthy oppose stronger antitrust laws, because “the laws currently on the books can and should be used to break up Big Tech.” Their own allies OPPOSED refiling a FB antitrust case Trump initiated.
1. A major new study by @reed_showalter shows that monopolization likely drives political corruption. When industry concentration goes up, lobbying spend goes up. When it goes down, lobbying spend goes down. The link is eery. economicliberties.us/press-release/…
2. The lesson from the paper is intuitive and obvious, but hadn't been proved before. "The bigger companies get, the more powerful they become." bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
3. @reed_showalter followed three different industries. Tech, oil and gas, and pharmaceuticals. He found a four year lag on lobbying spend linked to concentration. Basically when executives have to compete they focus on competing. When they have a monopoly they focus on politics.
Good piece on the debate over crypto rules. The crypto lobby wants to engage in money laundering and tax avoidance. That's all this is about. washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
There's a reason the crypto people despise Elizabeth Warren, because she's presenting an actual vision of a fair financial system. And that gets in the way of their cruel thunderdome vision where everyone is equally criminal.
Anti-monopolists believe in a strong state, not a weak one. A weak state leads to authoritarianism or social collapse. That's why the crypto lobby is full of people excited for the end of the dollar. The end of the dollar would be very bad.
Pfizer and Moderna are basically mocking Biden and Angela Merkel by not making enough vaccines and raising prices at the same time. Just a disaster. mattstoller.substack.com/p/bidens-failu…
Meanwhile, as Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna hoard, Russia and China have helped build vaccine production facilities in Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Egypt, India, Italy, Morocco, Serbia, South Korea, Turkey, and the UAE. mattstoller.substack.com/p/bidens-failu…
Good for the Biden administration. Unregulated crypto is useful for money laundering and ransomware. We cannot have a shadow financial system that’s not subject to securities laws and IRS rules. Crypto shouldn't be exempt from the law because people think it's cool.
If crypto is subject to know your customer rules, securities law, and taxes, fine. Go ahead and have fun. Otherwise, it's just about creating a zone of lawlessness.
Basically civil libertarians opposed the Bank Secrecy Act in the 1970s because they thought the right to engage in money laundering in Switzerland is a human right. Sorry but no. Financial surveillance is a core part of what it means to have a state.