🚨NEW, THREAD with reporting from me and @JenGriffinFNC : Gen. Austin Miller, former Commander of US forces-Afghanistan, told the Senate Armed Services Committee in a classified hearing yesterday he advised against the Afghanistan withdrawal, two sources confirm to me.
According to two members present for the hearing, Gen Miller passed his recommendations through the chain of command -- that the US should keep a level of troops on the ground (2500 was the number at the time) in order to maintain stability given the Taliban threat assessment.
Miller's view was troops should maintain holding pattern – potentially supplemented by add'l forces from allied nations – given the threat. Miller shared no recommendation on how long forces should have stayed, making clear he didn’t know what the end timeline would be.
Miller also said that he strongly dissented with the intel assessment that Afghanistan would fall to the Taliban between 1-3 years, saying he thought it would go much, much faster.
Miller also said once his recommendation was turned down, it became his job to execute on the withdrawal order – and eventually, decisions like abandoning Bagram were made because of constraints and troop caps imposed by the President’s orders.
For example, the 1k soldiers at Bagram were essentially forced out because they had no life support, and none was coming – because of President’s withdrawal timeline and troop cap.
CONTEXT HERE: Gen. Milley said the same thing to @JenGriffinFNC in her exclusive interview. The President’s troop cap, which has not been reported much, was a limit of about 500 to guard the Embassy and 500 to help NATO ally Turks guard the airport in Kabul...
... Troops at Bagram in the end were not troops designed to hold and defend an airfield -- that would have required 5-6000 troops to be inserted – which was not possible given the orders to withdraw on the WH timeline. @JenGriffinFNC
Overall this jives w/ prior reports: in March, Milley made impassioned case to keep troops in Afghanistan. His view was shared by Miller, and SecDef Austin - though somewhat lesser.
It further makes case POTUS rebuffed commanders, pressed on w/ full withdrawal against advice.
Also - @JenGriffinFNC is told Gen Miller had the ability to present his views to Biden on drawdown as well as his rec to keep troops in Afghanistan -- several times before drawdown. His assessments were included in Chairman of Joint Chiefs presentations ...
to NSC during the Afghan review before POTUS made his decision. Gen Miller also met with POTUS after he returned from Kabul. @JenGriffinFNC
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The State Department has been hit by a cyber attack, and notifications of a possible serious breach were made by the Department of Defense Cyber Command.
It is unclear when the breach was discovered, but it is believed to have happened a couple weeks ago.
A source familiar tells Fox the State Department’s ongoing mission to evacuate Americans and allied refugees in Afghanistan “have not been affected”.
The extent of the breach, investigation into the suspected entity behind it, efforts taken to mitigate it, and any ongoing risk to operations remains unclear.
🚨NEW, thread: my colleague @RichEdsonDC confirms WSJ reporting, that about two dozen State Dept officials in Kabul sent a memo to Blinken, other top officials July 13th, warning of potential Kabul collapse soon after withdrawal deadline, offering recs on mitigation & speedy evac
The confidential cable constitutes the clearest proof the Biden administration had been warned by its officials the Afghan military may not be able to hold off Taliban takeover - casting questions on POTUS claim
President Biden said to ABC in his ONLY q&a since the Taliban took the country, "The intelligence community did not say back in June or July that this is gonna collapse like it did."
- 6,741 evacuated since Sat. Although John Kirby said he did not have a breakdown, officials say 1792 are American citizens or legal permanent residents.
-There is major crowding at the north and east gates of Hamid Karzai International Airport (HKIA). As of this morning, the north gate was temporarily shut. The administration is finally acknowledging the problem is getting people to the airport. @RichEdsonDC
-John Bass, the former US ambassador to Afghanistan, is trying to negotiate with the Taliban to facilitate safe passage to the airport. He’s also going to negotiate to get any Americans who may be outside of Kabul to HKIA for flights out of the country. @RichEdsonDC
THREAD: From National Security Correspondent @JenGriffinFNC, via a well-placed source who spoke to Afghans at Presidential palace after Kabul fell to Taliban. Her source tells her:
1) “This happened so fast. None of us factored in the moral blow the US withdrawal would have on the Afghan National Army.” @JenGriffinFNC
2) The fall of the district capitals had a “domino effect.” People started cutting local deals with the Taliban.
“The Taliban had planned this really well. Not a force coming through the country that could be stopped. They were already there” in the provinces. @JenGriffinFNC
THREAD: Fox confirms @SpeakerPelosi has circulated White House talking points on Afghanistan. Some highlights:
- “Many have asked why we did not evacuate more Afghan civilians sooner. Part of this answer is that many did not want to leave earlier. Many Afghans to whom we gave visas to come to the US chose to stay in their country, still hopeful"
-"When Trump made the Doha agreement, there were 13,000 US troops in Afghanistan. When POTUS took office, Trump had drawn down troops to 2500. It's clear from the past few weeks that would have been necessary [to send more troops] ."
🚨NEW, thread: Pentagon confirms to me the Department of Defense is preparing to house thousands of Afghan refugees on American military installations, immediately including Fort McCoy in Wisconsin and Fort Bliss in Texas.
Documents obtained from a source show DoD planning to potentially relocate up to 30,000 Afghan SIV applicants into the United States in the immediate future.
“The situation in Afghanistan may lead to DoS [Department of State] allowing Afghan SIV applicants to be moved to temporary housing locations while still being vetted for parolee status,” the document reads.