Edwin Hayward Profile picture
Sep 15, 2021 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
"Eurosceptic Anne-Marie Trevelyan was tonight handed the job of negotiating Britain’s post-Brexit trade deals after Liz Truss succeeded Dominic Raab at the Foreign Office."

At least she won't ignore her principles for power. (But her CV dooms us further.)
dailybusinessgroup.co.uk/2021/09/trevel…
In a nutshell, from the article: "She voted for Brexit in 2016 and was a member of the hardline European Research Group. She resigned as a Parliamentary Private Secretary in 2018 over former PM Theresa May’s draft EU withdrawal agreement."

Dire. Dire. Dire.
Let's get to know her, in 4 tweets...

(Note: my earlier assessment was accurate.) ImageImageImageImage
She ticks all the myth boxes...
- Fast-growing markets far away can replace the giant market on our doorstep.
- % growth is king, raw numbers don't matter.
- No deal was a viable option, and an important negotiating tool.
- Democracy! Democracy! Democracy!
- GATT Article 24.🤦‍♂️
But wait, there's more.

Anne-Marie Trevelyan is an avowed worshipper at the altar of the One True £350 Million a Week message on the side of the Brexit bus, even going as far as to resort to the mathematical equivalent of a word salad to justify it... Image
Never mind. At least she's happy to acknowledge that Brexit "can take longer and even cost more as far as I am concerned".

Fine words to live by for the person in charge of our future trade deals. Wonder if she's had them made into a plaque? Image
Another reminder that she's not fussed if Brexit leaves us all poorer because it's the "greater ideals" that matter. Image
In Feb 2018, she attributed a boost in food and drink exports in 2017 - yes, 2017 - to Brexit.

Why? Presumably because we'd voted for it by then. But since we had yet to even reach the Brexit transition period, nothing whatsoever had changed by then in our trading relationships. Image
BTW, the notion that Brexit is worth being worse off has been ingrained in her since before the referendum...

Worth noting that her base salary is £81,932, and she's going to trouser an additional £31,680 for being a Minister of State.

So presumably "worse off" is relative. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Edwin Hayward

Edwin Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @edwinhayward

Oct 21, 2024
Some more experiments with AI music generation. See what you think...

(One video per tweet. Each includes a static image with the song as soundtrack. Links to Youtube versions at end of thread, together with a rundown of the tools I used to produce them.)

1. Humanity Ascendant
Tomorrow's Tomorrow
Technological Progress
Read 5 tweets
Oct 20, 2024
Perhaps it's unworkable, but this feels like it would be a fair tax system...

1) Set the tax free allowance so that it is the same as annualised minimum wage, and raise it every year in line with inflation. Do the same for NI thresholds. So someone on exactly the minimum wage will never pay tax/NI. If it's really meant to be the "minimum" people need to live on, then let them keep all of it.

2) No clawbacks of the tax free allowance no matter your income level. Everyone gets the same untaxed band.

3) Eliminate all 100%+ tax situations. Work should always pay, regardless of the combination of salary and benefits you're receiving. Set a maximum (say 75% combined for tax + NI) and fiddle with the tax system so there are no cliff edges that create effective tax rates above that 75%. In other words, if your income from any source increases by £1, you should never gain less than 25p.

4) Tax every source of income exactly the same. EVERYTHING falls under the same regime - salary, dividends, capital gains, etc. - with no loopholes or exceptions. (If expensive tax lawyers are left twiddling their thumbs, you know the revised system is working.)

5) Adjust all the rest of the income tax and national insurance bands above the sacrosanct "no tax/no NI" lowest band to allow for 1) to 4). This will almost certainly require more tax bands and more granularity.

Net result:
- There's a sense of basic fairness across society: everyone earning at or over the annualised minimum wage (regardless of the source of the money) gets to keep at least the annualised minimum wage component of their total income.
- Work always pays, period.
- There's no point at all in trying to optimise how you make money or game the system because all sources of income are taxed exactly the same

Ok, over to you. What do you think? Be gentle, please. It may well be a naive plan, but it's a naive well-intentioned plan.
Added:

I also believe that NI should be eliminated and there should be just one combined tax.

But that's not necessary for anything I've outlined above - it just makes things simpler, especially when you're taxing ALL income from ALL sources the same - so I left it out.
Added: Minimum wage is about £20,500 for a 48-week year of 40-hour weeks.

Removing both the income tax and the NI from that would leave over £2,200 more in the employee's pocket.

(MSE income tax calculator below.) Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 11, 2024
THREAD

As Labour are coming up to 100 days in power, it's good to ponder why their honeymoon was so short, and why they appear to be getting a torrid time from media outlets all across the political spectrum.

I've illustrated what I believe is happening. More below...

1/4 Image
The average person's expectations of the Tories was VERY low. Yet they underperformed even that low bar.

On the other hand, people had high hopes of Labour. The gap between such stellar expectations and reality is wider than on the Tory side - even though Labour are better.

2/4 Image
Dashed hopes can be a terrible thing. Especially after 14 years of despair. So it's hardly surprising that there has been a good deal of negative reaction and pushback.

Labour urgently need to improve their various stances to come much closer to what people expect of them.

3/4 Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 12, 2024
This is what Flux-AI gave me in response to the prompt: "The most quintessentially English scene possible". Image
Here is Dall-E-3's attempt.

(Same prompt. I'm not picking and choosing. I gave each AI just one shot at it.) Image
And here's SD3-Turbo's attempt. Image
Read 5 tweets
Jul 7, 2024
THREAD: The BBC have been having an absolute shocker the last couple of days.

Let's concentrate on 3 specific examples.

Example 1: Laura Kuenssberg's diabolic introduction to her interview with Ed Davey.

No spoilers. Wait until the end. It's worth it.
Example 2: The case of the quietly changed headline.

Original one (left)


Changed version a few hours later (right).


Remember, the one on the left is the one most of the BBC News website visitors will have been exposed to. web.archive.org/web/2024070606…
web.archive.org/web/2024070622…

Image
Image
Example 3: Eye-popping headline and bizarrely framed article about the Far Right's failure to meet expectations in France's election.

Objectivity be damned.
archive.ph/kkQx5
Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 2, 2024
This is not the election for protest votes.

For the first time, we could demote the Tories to third. Winning fewer seats than the LibDems would wipe them out as a political force.

Polls suggest this is within reach, but we need tactical voting to get us over the line.

1/12
Our choice is stark:

5 long years of the Tories in Opposition, pushing a hate-filled agenda of culture wars and immigrant-bashing.

Or the LibDems in Opposition, holding Labour to account on the issues that matter, with the Tories fuming, impotent, on the back benches.

2/12
If the Tories are in Opposition as the 2nd largest party, they get:
- 6 questions a week at PMQs
- Guaranteed coverage from media outlets with "due impartiality" requirements
- 17 Opposition Days to push their agenda and hold votes
- Almost £1 million in extra Short Money

3/12
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(