"Eurosceptic Anne-Marie Trevelyan was tonight handed the job of negotiating Britain’s post-Brexit trade deals after Liz Truss succeeded Dominic Raab at the Foreign Office."

At least she won't ignore her principles for power. (But her CV dooms us further.)
dailybusinessgroup.co.uk/2021/09/trevel…
In a nutshell, from the article: "She voted for Brexit in 2016 and was a member of the hardline European Research Group. She resigned as a Parliamentary Private Secretary in 2018 over former PM Theresa May’s draft EU withdrawal agreement."

Dire. Dire. Dire.
Let's get to know her, in 4 tweets...

(Note: my earlier assessment was accurate.) ImageImageImageImage
She ticks all the myth boxes...
- Fast-growing markets far away can replace the giant market on our doorstep.
- % growth is king, raw numbers don't matter.
- No deal was a viable option, and an important negotiating tool.
- Democracy! Democracy! Democracy!
- GATT Article 24.🤦‍♂️
But wait, there's more.

Anne-Marie Trevelyan is an avowed worshipper at the altar of the One True £350 Million a Week message on the side of the Brexit bus, even going as far as to resort to the mathematical equivalent of a word salad to justify it... Image
Never mind. At least she's happy to acknowledge that Brexit "can take longer and even cost more as far as I am concerned".

Fine words to live by for the person in charge of our future trade deals. Wonder if she's had them made into a plaque? Image
Another reminder that she's not fussed if Brexit leaves us all poorer because it's the "greater ideals" that matter. Image
In Feb 2018, she attributed a boost in food and drink exports in 2017 - yes, 2017 - to Brexit.

Why? Presumably because we'd voted for it by then. But since we had yet to even reach the Brexit transition period, nothing whatsoever had changed by then in our trading relationships. Image
BTW, the notion that Brexit is worth being worse off has been ingrained in her since before the referendum...

Worth noting that her base salary is £81,932, and she's going to trouser an additional £31,680 for being a Minister of State.

So presumably "worse off" is relative. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡

Edwin Hayward 🦄 🗡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @uk_domain_names

16 Sep
Did you know that the new Trade Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan is a keen climate change denier? Dangerous, given the key importance of environmental issues in trade deals.

She's posted quite an eye-opening series of tweets over the years. Let's step through them all in order... ImageImageImageImage
Ok, we're up to 2012. Let's keep going... ImageImageImageImage
Now we've reached 2013. She's not run out of steam yet... ImageImageImageImage
Read 12 tweets
16 Sep
CB1 development near Cambridge station is impressive.

10 years ago: industrial wasteland.

Now:
- 20+ shops, cafes & restaurants
- offices housing Microsoft, Amazon, Samsung, Apple, etc.
- Gym
- 2 pubs
- 2 hotels
- apartments & student accommodation.
- 4,000 space bike park
It may be a little sterile and modern, especially considering the character of the city centre.

But it's immeasurably better than what came before it. And several more buildings are nearing completion, which should mean more shops and other facilities, as well as accommodation.
I mention it because it's an example of a virtuous circle. The whole area is now jammed to the gills with major high-tech firms and startups. Why? Partly because it's Cambridge. But also because other firms arrived. Talent is pooling and concentrating and cross-fertilising.
Read 4 tweets
12 Sep
It's been almost exactly a year since Keir Starmer explicitly mentioned Brexit on Twitter.

Yes, that's right. He's not brought the subject up - not once - since we left the transition period.

[Insert your favourite chocolate teapot metaphor here.]
Here's his original tweet (the above was a screenshot just in case it went away - you never know with politicians)...
And that's before we even talk about WHAT HE SAID.

Was he warning about the dangers of Brexit? Highlighting the emerging issues.

No. He was telling Boris Johnson to get on with it.
Read 5 tweets
12 Sep
Hancock (25 March) "while we are confident that we have broken the link between the number of cases and the hospitalisations and deaths that previously inevitably followed, no vaccine is perfect and take-up is not 100%, so that link, while broken, is not yet severed"

Gibberish!
Important gibberish, because Boris Johnson - as well as many of his Ministers - would go on to variously talk about the link between hospitalisations and deaths being "broken" or "severed", expressions which made it into numerous newspaper articles too.
"Broken" and "severed" are synonymous.

What level-headed commentators said was that the link between cases, hospitalisations and deaths has been WEAKENED by the vaccine.

But "weakened" doesn't mean "broken".

The vaccine lowered deaths, but they're still 120+ a day on average.
Read 4 tweets
12 Sep
An average of 244 people died per day with COVID-19 (using narrow 28-day definition) for every day since Boris Johnson warned us in March 2020 that many families would lose loved ones before their time.

Equivalent to a plane crash a day, every day, for 549 days and counting...
That level of sustained, callous disregard for human life has created an insidious empathy vacuum that may never be filled.
Take the war in Afghanistan, for example. British losses in that conflict added up to fewer than two average days worth of covid deaths.
Read 4 tweets
11 Sep
"Cornwall may only get a maximum of £3million of cash from the Government to directly replace the £100m it could have been eligible for if the UK had remained in the EU"

If your first reaction is "so what, they voted for it" - no, most people didn't.
falmouthpacket.co.uk/news/19571108.…
NOTE: I am not arguing about the outcome of the referendum itself (not here, anyway). Leave got more votes than Remain in Cornwall.

But that doesn't imply that most people in Cornwall wanted to leave. In fact, based on the 2021 population, only 32% of residents chose to Leave.
What goes for Cornwall goes for the rest of the UK too.

There is no region of the UK in which more people voted Leave than didn't.

In every one, a majority of people are enduring Brexit because of the decision made by a minority (a winning minority, but still a minority).
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(